The Australian Racing Board has set 18 as the maximum number of times a jockey can whip a horse in a race, and as punters will know the jockeys are not at all happy about that. They're threatening more strikes this week. Err, not strikes of the whip.
Evidently the racing board sees more than 18 applications of the whip as cruel and 18 or fewer as not cruel, and it has the support of no less than the RSPCA in this assessment. The RSPCA in Victoria says it will prosecute a jockey who uses the whip more than 18 times, so it is clear that the royal society charged with preventing cruelty to animals sees 18 or less lashings of the whip as painless.
Or does the RSPCA see a certain amount of cruelty as acceptable if it's for entertainment?
The use of the whip that's restricted is the full-arm application to the horse's rump, by the way, not the slap of the whip on the horse's shoulder or the backhand strike.
Jockeys and other outraged members of the racing fraternity are earnestly assuring everyone that the new padded whips introduced in the past few months don't inflict pain. Why, then, use the whip at all? And why would the Australian Racing Board impose the limit of 18 strikes?
Can you tell us whether whipping a horse causes it pain? Or why 19 lashes of the whip is cruel and 18 is not?