Opinion 
 Blogs 
 Jeff Corbett 
 Beachy grossness 

Beachy grossness

It's hard to speak in defence of dick stickers, and I'm not about to. I stopped wearing mine to the beach one memorable day at Hat Head 12 years ago when my wife joined my eldest children in the attack. It was heated. Perverts wore dick stickers, they cried, and that afternoon I bought a pair of board shorts. Until that day I'd had no idea that there was anything even remotely offensive about budgie smugglers.

I have just read that Britain's biggest theme park resort has banned them, which is a big step given that just over the Channel are millions of dark and swarthy types who delight in standing around thrusting their bulgeing bellies and swimming briefs at onlookers.

The only bods wearing sluggos on our beaches these days are dark and swarthy - in deference to the sensibilities of women and children the rest of us have moved to board shorts despite the chafing and discomfort. But what's good for the gander is good for the goose, so how about some deference on the beach to the sensibilities of men?

Men wear more and women wear less, and while that is often a wonderful thing it is often not so wonderful. We are confronted at every beach by sights that recur as flashbacks for years - I had a flashback this morning of a shockingly tufty bikini wearer of quite some years ago. Rampant tuftiness is not the only shock in store at the beach. There's belly rolls wobbling between upper and lower elements of the bikini, navels that burrow out of sight, inner thighs that squelch audibly.

So I say it's time that women who don't rate eight on the Bo Derek scale of 10 revert to the one-piece with the frilly rings that run in layers from the top to the bottom. Wide frilly rings and with a little skirt at the bottom. Is that too much for a man who wears board shorts to expect?

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
thanks for the laugh Jeff - i think budgie smugglers are disgusting and there is something a bit deviant about them. when i read your comment about "shockingly tufty bikini wearer " i had a good laugh. maybe you could take a whipper snipper, hedge trimmer or something similar to the beach and offer free trims. i think a tank top and board shorts is a good look for females and covers up a bit more skin from the suns rays. i dont like parading around the beach in swim gear i usually wear a sarong over cossies. but i think a tank top and boardies is the way to go.
Posted by senior sergeant smith, 13/08/2009 10:07:46 AM, on The Herald
They have people selling suntan oil sprays on the beach, Sarge, so I can't see why we couldn't have people selling waxings. Those nearby would see nothing that wasn't visible anyway.
Posted by Jeff Corbett on 13/08/2009 12:34:05 PM
if it becomes socially unacceptable one has to either go with the flow or rebel. If you wish to rebel then you need to ask -what will i gain? If its a profile -do you need it? talking about nudity its a truly sad thing that recently a medico ceo's personal assistant went to a "personal improvement workshop" , returned to work, disrobed and jumped off the top of the building. Talking about male attachments and displaying them - in Pompei a house has a large statue of said anatomy at its front gate -is that the ultimate socially acceptable display of male 'skiting" there is ? Is display of personal assets another form of 'exhibitionism" that is really a bit "unnecessary' ? But some people dont believe they are worthwhile people unless they can some way make other people feel "inferior" -its perhaps another form of the "greed and envy twins" or "i have it all and you have nothing -so you are nothing and i am something but there is a common theme to all of this and that is a good mindscape knows the difference between true and false . back to the family - its a good thing to be with them and them to feel comfortable with that so why upset them? R U running out of sensible topics?
Posted by fashion concious, 13/08/2009 10:25:38 AM, on The Herald
The smugglers are a fashion crime, no question. More cover is always better than less, in the interests of melanoma avoidance, if not beachside decor. Blows my mind that the melanoma message isn't sinking in. Neck to knee cossies might be the way.
Posted by Abundance, 13/08/2009 10:54:57 AM, on The Herald
I'll admit it; I too, have progressed from budgie smugglers to board shorts. If obesity levels continue to increase, then T-shirts may become compulsory for men to cover the man-boobs. OR, for our world of increasing equality, men will wear a two piece, to cover the man-boobs, OR, should that be a one peice ? Swimming costumes could, in the future, become unisex, a one piece, that fits both men and women. It appears to be moving that way in Olympic swimming.
Posted by Jozep, 13/08/2009 11:02:43 AM, on The Herald
Jeff you have made the change from speedos to board shorts, have you made the change from jocks to high waisted , highly visible, underpants which feature an advertising band around the top? You could personalise the band with your own message, like a new tattoo everyday.
Posted by chaff and oats, 13/08/2009 11:18:57 AM, on The Herald
Puzzling, chaff and oats, how this visible underpants elastic can be seen by anyone as an advance of any sort.
Posted by Jeff Corbett on 13/08/2009 12:31:47 PM
jeff you could have dramatically increased the comments in this blog if you had talked about the lack of clothing exposed the tats on the beach and started the tattooed fools debate again.
Posted by senior sergeant smith, 13/08/2009 1:54:03 PM, on The Herald
Indeed, sarge, but at what cost to our well-being? Has there ever been a greater gathering of low life on a blog than emerged from their holes for my tattoo blogs?
Posted by Jeff Corbett on 13/08/2009 2:20:13 PM
the (made in china) Bonds undies elastics TV add i think says it all. and fashion - tell me about it? advances - yes it certainly is or hasnt anyone told you about being offended by "the fashionable plumbers crack" or the "male cleavage" do I have to do your job now too JC?
Posted by fashion concious, 13/08/2009 1:58:42 PM, on The Herald
intersting the origin of the baggy pants/visible undies fashion statement. It started in East LA, where as gangs members were arrested and incarcerated they had their belts and shoelaces confiscated to prevent deaths (suicides) in custody. The recently arrested would emerge from the lock up sans belt and laces with their pants hanging down. It soon became a badge of honour, and so the fashion statement was born. I do wonder though if a 15yr old from Argenton (or similar) has any inkling of this when making his statement these days. I suspect not, but as much as i despise the look my wife often reminds me that it's not hurting anyone. Fair enough. I moved away from the smugglers when i stopped competing in event swims. These days it's boardies and rash shirt as standard attire. I've hardly had a sunburn since i made the move, so that's gotta be a good thing
Posted by fista, 13/08/2009 2:30:47 PM, on The Herald
I like these nonsense topics, they usually turn into something different and sometimes you learn something new. As fista has shown today with the origin of the dreaded pants ready to fall and undies showing. I thought there would be alot of wedgy undie grabbing going on. As for the beach, it seems with some men the older they get the less they care what they look like. I also think there is less embarrassment with women now obesity is classed as a condition, not a size.
Posted by Buell, 13/08/2009 3:40:03 PM, on The Herald
Are you sure about that, Buell, that obesity is now seen as a condition not a size? It's much like saying that we don't see obesity as a product of eating too much.
Posted by Jeff Corbett on 13/08/2009 3:48:14 PM
Cheer up guys, it's not all sad. Some of you may (and some may not) be cheered to know that board shorts are good for fertility. Overheating the family jewels by confinement in tiny lycra can kill off the little wrigglers. Not that I'm advocating nudity, which would be totally against the spirit (or the flesh) of this blog. But aeration via freedom to dangle is better. This of course applies more to underpants styles than to swimmers. So while cleanliness may or may not be next to godliness, when it comes to knickers, fecundity is definitely next to modesty.
Posted by Chris, 13/08/2009 3:52:30 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >
Jeff Corbett
Bend the online ear of the Hunter's most provocative columnist.

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Bounce
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...