Opinion 
 Blogs 
 Jeff Corbett 
 Belated deportations 

Belated deportations

Immigration Minister Chris Evans told the Administrative Appeals Tribunal late last year that Motekiai Taufahema had failed "numerous opportunities to demonstrate that he can be trusted as a law abiding member of the Australian community", and clearly the same could have been said for Taufahema's younger brother Sione. In my column in The Herald today I ask why the opportunities had been so numerous. And what of the Australians who were robbed, savagely bashed and killed by the Tongan brothers?

Motekiai and Sione Taufahema are due to be released in 2012 after an 11-year sentence for the manslaughter of Senior Constable Glenn McEnally in Sydney, and before then both had many convictions and jail sentences for other crimes.

Belatedly the Immigration Department announced that it would cancel their visas and deport the brothers to Tonga at the end of their sentences, but both appealed to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal and Motekiai won his appeal because, the tribunal held, it was in the interests of his seven-year-old daughter, born after he was last jailed, that he stay in Australia. The Government appealed this to the Federal Court and Sione Taufahema appealed the tribunal's failure to overrule his deportation to the same court. A month ago the Federal Court upheld both decisions by the tribunal, with the result that Motekiai was to stay and Sione was to go. And last week Minister Evans used his discretionary ministerial powers to say that he would act in the nation's interest by deporting Motekiai Taufahema.

Australia will be a better place when they're both gone.

But why has it taken so long? Both failed the deportation character test by being sentenced to jail for at least 12 months a long time before they were involved in the killing of Constable McEnally, so should they not have been deported then? Why should not all non-citizens be deported at the first opportunity when they fail this character test? Should the courts be required to give the protection of the Australian community, the national interest, more weight?

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
1 strike and your out as far as i'm concerned. Not only did we fund these germs for years in Gaol, but i bet their appeals were tax payer funded also. The visa holders, and more importantly, the Australian Government should relaise anyone on a Visa is a guest in this country, Comit a crime, i don't care how serious, you have worn out your welcome and then they can pi$$ off home.
Posted by Nafe, 3/05/2010 10:07:18 AM, on The Herald
Clearly we have enough home grown criminals, and our society is quite capable of producing murderers, rapists, armed robbers and every other type of crime you can think of. So why welcome more into the community. Let's say bugger off. If only we could do that with our own...... send our convicts to another country. It's our reverse tradition!
Posted by leahkf, 3/05/2010 10:09:20 AM, on The Herald
The people who make these decisions (on min $250K-$300K per annum, best pensions etc) don't have to live with and experience these kind of scum. trip up ONCE and should be returned to sender - get rid of the rubbish no matter where they are from - we have enough of our own.
Posted by Joe Bloe, 3/05/2010 10:11:47 AM, on The Herald
Why did they only get eleven years for killing someone, especially when they had previous convictions? The concept of rehabilitation taking precedence over punishment has failed. Sentences need to reflect community expectations and not pander to the bleeding heart do-gooders.
Posted by moron, 3/05/2010 10:12:02 AM, on The Herald
I wonder if those brothers ever worked? It appears they have been parasites on Australians back since arriving here. I'm very happy for the pair of them to stay in Australia as long as they are behind bars. Eleven years for murdering one of our finest community protectors. If the system worked well, the Police Officer would still be alive as they should have been deported years before.
Posted by Buell/hypocrite, 3/05/2010 10:33:43 AM, on The Herald
1. they killed someone. they were found guilty beyond doubt. they should be executed. why the hell are my taxes being used to house and feed them? 2. the immigration dept has glenn mcenallys blood on its hands. they failed australia; and they failed glenn and his family and friends. more stringent laws need to be in place and enforced.
Posted by judgedredd, 3/05/2010 10:42:42 AM, on The Herald
not sure how it's in the interest of a seven year old child to be around this grub. I wonder what wonderful new skills they picked up in prison.
Posted by fista, 3/05/2010 10:45:55 AM, on The Herald
in true Darwinian fashion, criminal #1 managed to reproduce in his new environment. As if having a child in Australia would have been a good excuse for keeping him here - you can bet he would make a rubbish parent anyway and barely see his children, or girlfriend of the month. But don't worry, we'll pick up the tab for that, and no doubt he'll sire a few more and not raise them wherever he goes.
Posted by Charles, 3/05/2010 10:55:35 AM, on The Herald
The fact that both brothers got into trouble suggests a genetic basis for a lot of the problems.
Posted by Jack, 3/05/2010 10:57:32 AM, on The Herald
On the farm we don't spend a lot of time or money investigating why a beast got caught in the fence, or stuck in the dam, or how we can get it out and nurture it back to health. You don't muck around. The unlucky animal is shot and dealt with fast, and you move on. You don't spend $500 on a vet. Of course, I'm not suggesting these shocking, parasitic, criminal offenders should receive capital punishment, but they should be dealt with swiftly and decisively. To answer Jeff's questions : But why has it taken so long? BECAUSE WE, THE COMMUNITY, ALLOW IT TO. Both failed the deportation character test by being sentenced to jail for at least 12 months a long time before they were involved in the killing of Constable McEnally, so should they not have been deported then? YES, BUT WE ALLOW THE LEGAL SYSTEM TO THWART COMMON SENSE. Why should not all non-citizens be deported at the first opportunity when they fail this character test? THEY SHOULD. Should the courts be required to give the protection of the Australian community, the national interest, more weight? ABSOLUTELY.
Posted by Abundance, 3/05/2010 11:41:33 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >
Jeff Corbett
Bend the online ear of the Hunter's most provocative columnist.

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Bounce
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...