Opinion 
 Blogs 
 Jeff Corbett 
 Bring back Neville 

Bring back Neville

In at least one way the Aborigine garden statue known as Neville and the homage delivered by the tediously PC to Aborigines as traditional owners are the same. Both, I say, are excruciatingly kitsch. Australians used to have an Aborigine in a loin cloth and holding a spear in the front yard and now, instead, they pay homage to "the traditional owners of this land on which we meet". Well, only the most rectified Australians pay that homage, and these days they race through it because they know we're over such rot.

These strident PCers will say that Neville was racist and that their homage is correcting the wrongs of that racism. Evidence of their mounting desperation, by the way, is to be seen in the fact that when they kicked off their absurd appeasement they referred to Aborigines as the traditional caretakers of the land, then a year or two later as the traditional custodians and now as traditional owners. Where to next?

Maybe, just maybe, their next will be a Neville in their own front yard. A mate and I are intent on restoring Neville to his righteous place among the shrubbery in Australia's front yards and we've been hoping to lead the rescue by installing Neville in our own yards. But Nevilles have gone from being ubiquitous to non-existent. After the parodying television series Kingswood Country poked cruel fun at Neville's owners one night in the early 1980s tens of thousands of Australians slipped out and buried him.

And that may well have been the birth of the self-consciousness and doubt that became the paralysing political correctness. My mate and I see Neville as leading us into the unPC age, and I'm sure he's up to leading us all back to an age of guilt-free confidence if we can find him.

Will you install Neville in your yard? Or do you prefer the guilt and the shame of the PC age?

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The Earth is 4,500,000,000 years old. Our traditional owners have been here for 40,000 years, or about 0.001% of that time. To paraphrase George W. Bush "I believe Neville and the fish can co-exist."
Posted by Bruno, 29/09/2009 10:18:00 AM, on The Herald
The average life of Neville is at least 20 years less than that of the average statue. And what are we doing about it?
Posted by Bal Mrough, 29/09/2009 10:19:43 AM, on The Herald
I have a very pale statue that although does not look a great anything like Neville, as it identifies itself an indigenous statue, it fits within the requirements.
Posted by Doc, 29/09/2009 10:23:03 AM, on The Herald
Someone stole my Neville and gave it to another front yard to raise, saying they could do a better job than I could. And I never even got an apology.
Posted by Solly, 29/09/2009 10:28:48 AM, on The Herald
oh dear , lets start with they have been here for 25,000 years. Not 2.5seconds, not 2.5minutes, not 2.5 hours, not 2.5 days. not 2.5 weeks, not 2.5 months , not 2.5 years, not 25 years, not 250 years, not 2500 years , but 25,000 years , thats about 1000 generations . We have been here for about 8 generations. Because we had borsaks with guns we rule! So where does that leave us and any respect that some of us may feel towards these people and what was their land that they occupied. It was terra nulus by captain cooks little legal work-around, but in the 60's or 70's (whatever) we recognised that by law (lawyers and anchors?) the owners of australia (owners only by traditional occupation of 1000 generations -squatters if you like) were in fact legally entitled to be called human beings. So who suscribes to any of this rubbish and just says might is right -so sue us. Well they did and they won. If we dont like it we should sue them back - but realistically I dont have a great deal of confidence in our moral rights to any of it? All smacks of the worst of human behavour thru history, doesnt it? Robert borsak rocks and rules and the one with the guns owns everthing? so sue me?
Posted by ohno-sosueme, 29/09/2009 10:29:52 AM, on The Herald
I abhor the obsequious and patronising acknowledgement of the 'traditional owners of the land' that is spouted at every gathering these days. I do not acknowledge the traditional owners of the land. I certainly respect them, and defend their rights as I would my own, but I am strongly against this ongoing symbolic self flagellation that we seem to have embraced. Surely Aboriginal people find the whole thing intensely patronising? I feel that I am insulting (rather than honouring) Aboriginal heritage every time I hear it. There's no way they, as intelligent and cultured people, could feel vindicated or honoured by such a lame display. To me, Gough Whitlam pouring soil into Vincent Lingiari's hand is a powerful symbol of reconciliation, and the ongoing efforts of successive governments have contiunued that, as flawed as the process has been. Political correctness is a mechanism used by passive aggressive drones to influence our daily lives and behaviour. I utterly reject all forms of PC. That doesn't mean I am (always) an ill mannered boor ~ it simply means I am a responsible adult, and I allow others to be responsible adults. I don't pre-empt (or fear) their responses to life.
Posted by Abundance, 29/09/2009 10:50:24 AM, on The Herald
Well put, Bruno. As usual, the numbers tell the whole story....
Posted by Abundance, 29/09/2009 10:51:41 AM, on The Herald
I need Neville in the front yard to guard the tyre swan.
Posted by stormbringer, 29/09/2009 11:05:32 AM, on The Herald
Oh Dear Jeff. If you stir up this matter, I may not be able to approach the traditional owners for improved health care benefits, improved housing, improved Centrelink benefits, and other general improvements to my living standards. If we denegrate them too much they may take back their land and then we can all go and live as one in a traditional lifestyle, adhere to the Dreamtime legends and spear all wrong doers in the leg for transgressions. But, fear not, Kevin 707 will soon put a stop to that. He will migrate and become the adopted child of President Obama. All problems solved.
Posted by MizJaz, 29/09/2009 11:15:34 AM, on The Herald
I agree about the patronising drivel, it would make more sense to say something that is meaningfull rather than calling every baby the start of a supermodel or supa spunk.. But remember 95% of people that espouse that drivel dont know what they are talking about anyway! They then need a prompt card of words to say. Thats what PC is isnt it? Words that disguise the stupidity of those saying them? Words of pretence that we hear from the mayor of springfield? But amongst all of that some form of appearance of progressive process must be maintained and that is another task of PC. So to drivel or not to drivel that is the question?
Posted by confused, 29/09/2009 11:16:04 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6  |  next >
Jeff Corbett
Bend the online ear of the Hunter's most provocative columnist.
Neville and Noeline in a photo supplied by Bonnyrigg Garden Centre
Neville and Noeline in a photo supplied by Bonnyrigg Garden Centre

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Bounce
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...