Opinion 
 Blogs 
 Jeff Corbett 
 Children in squalor 

Children in squalor

There is a grey area between concern and alarm, and I'm in it when I see a house in a suburb near my home gathering the detritus of squalor. Playing out the front are small children, and if the squalor outside is an indication of conditions inside those children need checking. But maybe, I remind myself, my concern is simply a product of my distaste for people who live like that. The grey area.

But I cannot accept that the evidence had not pushed a fair number of people past the grey area in a case reported on The Herald's front page yesterday. The report of a Newcastle Local Court hearing told how police, after being alerted by Department of Housing smoke alarm inspectors, had found three children living in such filth that the police had to cut short their search of the home in the interests of their own health. There was human faeces stored in plastic bags, an overflowing toilet, no lights, an infestation of cockroaches, and the bedroom floors were so littered with dog faeces that the children slept with their father in the loungeroom. The children are aged 10, 12 and 14 and now living with their mother, and the 14-year-old was in tears when the department inspectors overcame his attempts to prevent their entry to the home.

The father was fined $800 for child neglect, and I can't see what such a penalty will achieve other than exacerbating a terrible situation.

But what angers me most is that neighbours, parents of the children's friends, and school staff must have known that the children were living in disturbing circumstances and done nothing. Or not enough. The mother, who lives elsewhere and who has seen the children regularly, must have known more than she'll admit to now. These children could not have left the stench, the filth, the stamp of squalor at the front door.

Surely some will have phoned DOCS, or Community Services as it calls itself now. Remember Ebony? Did DOCS go to check? Was it fobbed off at the front door? I have seen too many DOCS failures to allow a name change to sweeten my cynicism.

What are your thoughts on the fine, the community's blind eye, the future of such families and children?

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
im not sure what should be done here JC. i read that they found cannabis in the house. smoking too much pot would probably account for the fathers laziness. it's not hard to be average clean. filthy is lazy. i hate the idea of taking the kids away from their father but what good is keeping them with him? and mum is probably a loose cannon too if dad has the kids and not mum.... very sad and difficult situation. i agree the fine won't do anything to help the situation. i have called the police to a house near mine that erupts in ugly domestic violence regularly........ without knowing the circumstances here its hard to accuse neighbours of turning a blind eye but surely the people living next door to them would have an idea of how bad the situation was? if people know something, do nothing and something bad happens they are partially guilty as far as i am concerned.
Posted by judgedredd, 24/06/2010 8:56:39 AM, on The Herald
The fine is irrelevant.The blind eye? People simply do not care enough to say something! The future of the children? Sink or swim! Around all suburbs there is evidence of the "squalor syndrome". Filth and piled junk. Many people who live on their own live under conditions where they actually go to the toilet in their yard. Every neighbourhood has examples Merewether to any where in Newcastle. When travelling on a train any where in Australia glance out the window into the backyards. At least 50% of properties have the pile of junk and and rubbish. This includes industry commercial and residential lots.
Posted by old boy, 24/06/2010 10:07:11 AM, on The Herald
Jeff, I often hate that when children are living in these conditions the first thing someone does is say "why didn't the teacher/school/neighbours know". I have commented here many times that my wife is a Kindergarten teacher - she has kids every year that she think may be suffering some type of neglect - it's much more common than you think. I will give you just one example of her frustration - in 2007 she had a student who she thought was the victim opf abuse at home. She did everything she could, advised the principal, contacted DoC's, started taking notes for 'evidence'. This poor kid would come to school in urine stained clothes, no food, and obviously not bathed. For 12 months my wife collected 'evidence', had regular meeting with senior staff, staying in contact with authorities. It took a further 2 years (3 years in total) before DOCS finally took the child off her parents and put her into care. This happens year after year, the small 'abuses' get recognised and reported by good teachers like my wife who deal with these kids daily, she buys them food and comforts them as best she can. DOCS don't listen. When the teacher does notice, nothing happens!
Posted by Anon Mouse, 24/06/2010 10:48:33 AM, on The Herald
I have every confidence that DOCS has been notified of the neglect of the children in this case. DOCS won't admit that, of course, at least not until and unless the chiefs are under oath.
Posted by Jeff Corbett on 24/06/2010 11:09:15 AM
Unfortunately there will always be cases like this and there will always be negligent parents. So instead of imposing fines - like that will teach this father a lesson. We need to work out how to genuinely help these children. We need to teach them the life skills and basic social skills for living in our community. Is taking them from one parent and giving them to another the answer? I doubt it. Does fostering work? I wonder what research has been done on that. I can't recall the exact numbers but I remember hearing the number of calls that DOCS get each day, and it is such a ridiculously high amount, they don't have the resources to come close to investigating them all. So I just hope their logging systems is such that it can cross reference key details (names and addresses) and flags when there is a high number of reportings. I would also hope that DOCS place weight on teachers and GPs doing the reporting.
Posted by leahkf, 24/06/2010 10:50:34 AM, on The Herald
"By 1990, no Australian child will be living in poverty" said Labor PM Bob Hawke. Perhaps another Labor PM can make that promise again. As there are no children in trade unions not much will happen.
Posted by Beryl, 24/06/2010 11:23:36 AM, on The Herald
DOCS?? Surely it means Duds of Course System. From an under- funded organisation to operators of dubious ability to see things as they are and take appropriate action in the interests of the children, there are no doubt, a lot more of this type of incident which will be exposed.
Posted by MizJasper, 24/06/2010 11:56:23 AM, on The Herald
Perhaps we should run a book on whether DOCS has been notified of these children's plight, on whether it ignored those reports or failed to act appropriately and effectively. In short, on whether once again DOCS has failed children in desperate need of intervention.
Posted by Jeff Corbett on 24/06/2010 12:03:56 PM
And who is doing the clean up? I read that the man is staying with friends while the place is cleaned. Surely he should be doing the cleaning himself, working off the fine perhaps, and the kids should be in there too cleaning. They are capable of cleaning up and should be taught the hard truth that people of all ages, have to take some responsibility as befits their age. These kids will just learn that they make a mess, others will clean it up...and the 'poor me' excuse has probably been spouted by this man for decades.
Posted by huey, 24/06/2010 12:35:39 PM, on The Herald
My mother was harassed by docs when I was young due to my accident-prone ways (fractured skull, cheekbone and leg in the space of 6 months when I was 8) which was fair enough I suppose, some things need to be checked out. At the same time I had a friend who lived in absolute squalor (and smelt it) who never had a visit. It seems the ones who need help the most are the one's docs neglect. I still remember the case in Qld where docs sent a 17 year old with multiple convictions on a taxpayer funded holiday to a beachside town because they thought it would be 'good for him". Upon arriving there he subsequently raped and murdered a 3 year old. Well done docs.
Posted by G, 24/06/2010 1:36:51 PM, on The Herald
Instead of hounding the mother I feel we should be looking more closely at the government agencies who obviously have failed to investigate the situation & act accordingly. Who are we to past judgement on the mother Who is probably bounded by custody papers to alow access this man to her children. In my opinion I believe the real vicims are the Children and the Mother that has to pick up the broken pieces....
Posted by edward, 24/06/2010 1:48:31 PM, on The Herald
im with you on there huey. and getting them to clean up will give them a sense of achievement and will hopefully make them less inclined to mess it up again.
Posted by judgedredd, 24/06/2010 2:05:43 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6  |  next >
Jeff Corbett
Bend the online ear of the Hunter's most provocative columnist.

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Bounce
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...