Police caught the 14 men who appeared in Newcastle court this week charged with soliciting prostitutes by positioning plain-clothed policewomen on an Islington street corner. But, pertinently, they were good sorts, and as one of the men tells me in my column in The Herald today, the one that enticed him to stop was an especially good sort. And the police inspector in charge of the month-long operation concedes in my column today that the policewomen were a cut above the usual streetworker standard.
Does this amount to entrapment?
The fellow I interviewed for my column, one of the 14, tells me he had no intention of calling on the services of a prostitute until noticed the particularly good sort inviting offers on the Islington corner. He just happened to be driving along Maitland Road. And he admits that from time to time he has done business with Islington street prostitutes who were not good sorts, but his point remains a fair one. He was not charged with soliciting sexual services on those other occasions - he was charged with soliciting sexual services on the occasion he was enticed to do so by the beauty of the copper's decoy.
If police are out to catch men who may be so enticed, they'll do wonders for their crime-busting figures if they can get Jennifer Hawkins to stand there for half an hour one day.
Would it be fairer if police wired the current prostitutes for verbal evidence and paid them the usual rate per catch?
And in my column today I expand on my belief that there is no shame among men for using prostitutes, that I and my ilk think no less of men who do. Am I right or wrong?