News reports about Port Stephens Council have shown a steady deterioration in the relationship between the mayor, Bruce MacKenzie, and a group of councillors, and for a while it seemed as simple as their complaint that Cr MacKenzie had left them out of the loop. If ever it was that simple, it is not now. The group of councillors have lodged formal and detailed complaints against Cr MacKenzie with the Department of Local Government, and, as we read last week, the animosity has reached such a level that councillors for and against the mayor cannot sit together at the usual post-meeting meal. Many readers will have been reminded of the conflict that became paralysing antipathy at Cessnock, Maitland and Newcastle councils and which led to the state government's sacking of the Maitland and Newcastle councils.
What is at play in these hatreds? They do seem peculiar to local government, and it is worth noting that even in the workplace where individuals are in closer and longer contact in more stressful and demanding circumstances such damaging, irredeemable feuds are comparatively rare.
In my column in the Herald today I give what I believe is a likely explanation for early conflict between Cr MacKenzie and some councillors, and that is his propensity to crash through obstacles. Cr MacKenzie has a "can do" attitude that does not brook readily the delays of process, and many people who aspire to be councillors are sticklers for procedure. But that alone does not seem to account for what appear now to be hatreds.
Nor does it seem to be a matter of politics, given that political differences are often not evident. And in any event, almost all of us make room for political differences.
So what is it that reduces councillors who were at the outset respectable, decent and courteous to rancorous loathing? Might it have something to do with the type of people who aspire to become a councillor? Their reasons for becoming a councillor?