Opinion 
 Blogs 
 Jeff Corbett 
 Dysfunctional families 

Dysfunctional families

We're always shocked when a family is so dysfunctional that it makes news, and you may recall the Herald's report last week about the home strewn with faeces and other filth. The father was fined $800! Dysfunctional families, though, are a fact of life and much more common than most Australians would believe. Figures provided recently by Community Services, which is the new name for DOCS, and reported in the Sydney Morning Herald this week providing a fascinating insight into the extent of dysfunction. Or, rather, of what some people consider dysfunction.

A department report says one-third of NSW's 15- and 16-year-olds have been reported to Community Services as being neglected or abused and that just over one in four of the state's children was "known to DOCS" in June last year. Only a small proportion of reported cases are investigated and only 3 per cent of children reported as abused or neglected are found by DOCS to have been harmed.

Dysfunction is a subjective assessment, of course. I expect, for example, that a neighbour of 14 years ago, a woman, who objected to my having my 12-year-old son mow the lawn reported that abuse to DOCS. But the cold fact is that there is no mistaking, unless you're DOCS, serious cases of abuse or neglect of children.

What can be done about these seriously dysfunctional families? Many people would have Centrelink payments withdrawn, but clearly that is going to have an impact on the children and promote criminality. Others want the children removed, but where to? Foster families are not in free supply and many children from dysfunctional families are not suitable to join a traditional family. And rescuing the children of only the most dysfunctional families leaves a great many children in less seriously dysfunctional families being harmed or at risk of being harmed.

I hope on Monday to write about a charity in the US and Britain that offers money to women junkies and alcoholics who undergo sterilisation, and I believe this could be made dramatically more effective by extending it to both women and men who are helpless gamblers, violent, unemployable, ferals or chronically mentally ill. At the very least this charity would reduce the number of reports to the inept DOCS.

In the meantime tell us what can be done about dysfunctional families. And what is a dysfunctional family?

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What happened after you were reported to DoCS? Did you receive a visit or some other notification? Did they make any inquiries and what was their tone? How did you find out who made the report? Did you speak to the neighbour about it? What does the now 26 year old think about it 14 years later? Inquiring minds want to know about the role of the state in the parent-child relationship.
Posted by Danny, 2/07/2010 5:55:53 AM, on The Herald
I don't know that she did report my son mowing the lawn to DOCS. Her concern, of course, is a nonsense. Great job for boys, mowing the lawn. My second son, too, started mowing the lawn at 11 or 12, first just the flat and smallish front lawn and a couple of years later graduating to the back and front, a couple of years after that to the whipper snippering as well. It's a decent earner too, at, currently, $35. I'd mow it myself for that! A problem is that in a rash moment I told him I'd match his savings when he went to buy a car at age 17, and since he's saving the $35 for that purpose it costs me $70 every time he mows the lawn! I need a second job mowing lawns.
Posted by Jeff Corbett on 2/07/2010 10:08:43 AM
Jeff , there have always been families who are outside what could be termed the "norm" and no doubt many cases of child abuse/neglect would have gone unreported in years gone past , however there seems to be a class in society today that wear living off govenment hand outs as a birthright - from the time their unwanted offspring supply them with a cash bonus for being born till the time said offspring themselves can line up for their share of taxpayer dollars they see their kids as a form of income stream. The first thing that should be abolished is the Bogan Breeding Bonus , it should be deferred until parents have successfully raised a child with no criminal convictions to the age of 16 - that might provide incentive to actually raise a child not just produce one.
Posted by smithy, 2/07/2010 7:32:31 AM, on The Herald
im with Scott Hillard here.... that "offer" from the charity in the US and Britain should actually be government run and mandatory. sterilise all the rubbish. the stats you quoted from DOCS are alarming and actually, upon reflection, i find them hard to believe. one in three 15-16 year old kids reported for neglect or abuse? that has to be rubbish. i am under the view that many govt departments actually dont try to fix the things they should because if they did they would then not have a job..... take ACON and their SWOP department in old boys islington for example. if they actually get the prostitutes off the street they no longer have a job. no wonder they are handing out literature to the prostitutes on how to avoid arrest for conducting an illegal activity and telling residents that they will never get rid of them. is docs (or community services now) just trying to justify their existence? and their pay? whilst i know it would be a tough job, they don't seem to function too well. if they were doing a great job they would not have changed their name.
Posted by judgedredd, 2/07/2010 9:13:49 AM, on The Herald
3 mths ago I removed a child from his home after witnessing abuse by a family member. He has been known to me for the past 10 yrs & has stayed with me regularly during that time. His home life is horrifying with drug & alcohol abuse, neglect and physical & emotional abuse. After I took him I phoned the police and DOCS & told them what I had done. To say that I had difficulty getting DOCS to do anything is an understatement! I had to inundate them with visits and phone calls and become increasingly insistent that something be done about this little boy. I only discovered this week through court papers that there had been 47 notifications to DOCS about this child over the years. (Plus others relating to his siblings.) I am now his official foster mum and on a steep learning curve. DOCS has now removed him from his mother's care until he is 18. Although I have always been very involved in this child's life, I didn't think I would end up raising him. Either I took him or he would have gone to somebody he didn't know as nobody in his family was deemed suitable to take him. He is thriving and is the light of my life. My only regret is that I can't take all his siblings as well.
Posted by Proud Mum, 2/07/2010 9:18:41 AM, on The Herald
Aha! I've converted you at last, Jeff! The only problem with voluntary sterilisation of ferals, smackheads, drunkards, mental defectives, etc is that it is voluntary. Early intervention is the key - by the time DOCS or other agencies become involved in these basket cases, the damage is already done and society has to deal with yet another disfunctional generation. It's abundantly clear at birth (usually before) that children will be at serious risk of neglect or harm from disfunctional parents - they should be removed then and a strong system of domestic adoption utilised to place them in decent homes. There is no shortage of decent, functional adults desperate to adopt children in Australia - and no shortage of children stuck with indecent, disfunctional parents - it seems pretty clear how you can rebalance that equation. This untermensch who had his kids literally living amongst shit should just get a bullet in the back of the neck and have done with it - the fact that our society (and courts) tolerate this is an indictment on us more damning than any other I can think of. Hippies have hissy fits about boat people being locked up - they should get their priorities sorted.
Posted by Scott Hillard, 2/07/2010 9:49:14 AM, on The Herald
Society is now beginning to reap what has been sown. For some years now we have experienced young persons growing up under the provisions of the Young Offenders Act whereby they are no longer held accountable for their actions and the only punishment seems to be the ubiquitous 'Caution.' Now you have many of these persons forming relationships, moving in together, quickly having a number of children before splitting, moving on to another partner and the cycle begins again. Of course, many of the children of these relationships consider it all normal to have a number of fathers/mothers and they too grow up with a distorted view of reality.
Posted by MizJasper, 2/07/2010 9:50:43 AM, on The Herald
Scott - it is hard for us to believe you wouldn't whack on the jack boots (and lederhosen for private occasions) at at moments notice when you use the word "Untermensch" [from good old wikipedia: (German for under man, sub-man, sub-human; plural: Untermenschen) is a term that became infamous when the Nazi racial ideology used it to describe "inferior people", especially "the masses from the East," that is Jews, Gypsies, Poles along with other Slavic people like the Russians, Serbs, Ukrainians, so-called Mischlinge and anyone else who was not an "Aryan" according to the contemporary Nazi race terminology.
Posted by Bill Hilly, 2/07/2010 10:14:59 AM, on The Herald
How's this for disfunctional, father's in jail for a very long time, mother's a screaming horror and the teenage daughter is pregnant to her younger brother. Sounds like a scene out of Deliverance? Nope, right here in Newcastle and DOCS (DOn't Care, Sorry) are nowhere to be seen.
Posted by G, 2/07/2010 10:31:56 AM, on The Herald
What some people call dysfunctional others may call character building. There's the story of Frank Packer sending his fat son Kerry back to the boarding school in gellong after his arrived minus his cricket bat - maybe he should have been reported to DOCS as well. How many of our 'high achievers" have talked about a background of alcoholic parents and brutal punishment handed out to them.
Posted by stevo106, 2/07/2010 10:33:39 AM, on The Herald
At 14 I trawled the local blocks and a little afar with an old victa (no deck shield around the base ) and did front lawns for 10/- and front and back for 20/-. It was easy to find customers by the overgrown lawns and I really earnt my money. It paid for all the plastic model kits that I bought from Hunter Toys and Hobbies. Thats all gone to history now and really is unacceptable for a nyumber of reasons - but I imagine the young entrepeneurs now find other needs to fill on the open market , legal or not. I wonder which is the more acceptable?
Posted by airfix, 2/07/2010 10:34:55 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >
Jeff Corbett
Bend the online ear of the Hunter's most provocative columnist.

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Bounce
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...