Opinion 
 Blogs 
 Jeff Corbett 
 Fat but not happy 

Fat but not happy

It must be hard being fat. Everyone with any claim to special knowledge is howling with disgust at fatties' excess, proclaiming their despicability and threatening to take their fat children from them. It's the adult version of playground taunts, and just as cruel. So I wonder occasionally as I look at a fat person, can anyone today be fat and at peace? Sometimes, too, I ask myself if there is not a point where every fat person says "enough is enough" or "enough has been too much".

But as hard as it must be being fat, for many people it must be hard not to be fat. On my bike ride to and from Katoomba last week I'd look every afternoon for a fruit shop and there were not many to be found. In Windsor, for example, I walked the length of a long main street, past at least two ice-cream stores, a lolly shop and greasy spoons but there was no fruit shop. Eventually one of the locals directed me to Coles behind the main street.

And much of the fruit in pretty well every fruit shop and supermarket is unripe, out of season and tasteless. A chocolate bar and/or a packet of chips is much more reliable and much easier to find. And it is generally true, I think, that greasy takeaway is a cheaper family dinner than a healthy home-cooked meal.

Eating healthily requires skills that many may not have, and those skills range from identifying good fruit to assembling and cooking a healthy meal. Required also, I suppose, is a certain knowlege of the various food groups and our need for the mix. Takeaway requires none of this knowledge or awareness. It's easy, quick and cheap. It was much easier for me in Windsor and three or four other towns to buy chocolate bars than bananas, and after riding 90km it wouldn't have mattered if I had. But habits die hard, and bad habits die just as hard hard.

In one of his television series Jamie Oliver showed the shocking extent of the ignorance of healthy eating, in England at least, and other shows have highlighted this ignorance even more dramatically. We are inclined to see obesity as the result of decision or indecision, when it is more likely, I think, to be the result of a lack of knowledge and skills.

Maybe we should have and promote publicly funded classes for healthy eating, healthy cooking and healthy living. Is there a single fat person who wants to be fat?

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Compared to 200+ years ago where we practically had to hunt and then kill our own food we have become a world of excess and convenience. It is so easy to heat and eat our meals, drive through a fast food outlet, or order it online or on the phone. For most time is becoming increasingly more of a luxury and who wants to spend it in the kitchen cooking? Along with the changes in eating we need to get off our couches and take the thumbs off the playstation joysticks and get back to basics.
Posted by norteangel, 1/04/2009 6:24:57 PM
there are so many things in your article i disagree with...it's not hard to tell the basics of whats good for you and whats bad for you. there are already dietary guidelines the government has set out for all Australians http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publicati ons/synopses/dietsyn.htm if you want more information on what is good for you and what isn't, all you have to do is look on the internet - you don't need publicly funded classes to educate people on how to eat healthy - that would be another unnecessary waste of tax payers money. by following the simple and easy physical activity model, people will get the recommended minimal daily activity, although more will obviously be better for you. unless you have some type of disease/illness, if you exercise regularly and eat healthier, you will become skinnier over time. Also, if parents let their kids become obese and unhealthy, i think they shouldn't be allowed to keep them. It is clearly a care issue - if you do not care so much as to buy your children at least healthy food then do something about it - its not like the information is hard to access.
Posted by innocentchild, 1/04/2009 8:50:25 PM
I'm pretty sure most schools already have healthy eating/lifestyle classes. I have an obese (morbidly) sisterinlaw who raised two obese kids. I saw every trick in the book said and used as to why her kids were overweight. It was an impossible situation for me to say anything. However, I know that the kids were taught what constitutes healthy eating at school (in QLD). I have the 'pleasure' of shopping at a major supermarket in Mayfield occasionally and I see what people have in their trolleys. It's sad to see - bottles of soft drink, frozen meals, chips etc, and no fresh fruit or vegies. And yes all those shoppers are huge as are their kids. It does seem to be socio-economic driven. But once these kids are addicted it is hard to break. We are constantly having advertising thrown at us, it is unrelenting, and we like lemmings believe the crap that is thought up to convince us that something is healthy when clearly it isn't.
Posted by leahkf, 2/04/2009 8:16:17 AM
I've had similar experiences to you on my cycling adventures Jeff. It is almost impossible to get a sandwich after 2:00 PM in most towns, but a greasy hamburger, chips and soft drinks are ubiquitous, so even if you are full of good intent and educated as to healthier food choices it is still often difficult to find something suitable. However, part of the problem is also the relatively new perception of hunger as something that must be immediately sated, which I feel many of the large fast food companies are responsible for with their advertising. Once it was perfectly OK to have a grumbling tummy in the knowledge that your next meal was only a few hours away, but now it seems imperative to have a snack straight away. Hunger is now equated with pain and physical discomfort which must be alleviated straight away, often with something high in calories, fat and salt, particulalry inthe abscence of better choices.
Posted by Directeur Sportif, 2/04/2009 8:31:05 AM
Very interesting comment, DS, the "relatively new perception of hunger as something that must be immediately sated". Of course you are right, and I'm reminded of Maccas and other FF chains putting up flashing billboards asking "Hungry?".

It has become part of our daily lives that we eat something when we detect a rumble. Also, we feel compelled to eat at certain times whether we're hungry or not. Morning tea, eg; even lunchtime.

Posted by Jeff Corbett on 2/04/2009 9:26:23 AM
Great and let's make those classes compulsory for the sad fat bastards. Come on let's round these oxygen thieves up and brainwash them to fit in with how the rest of society thinks. Think I'm being sarcastic? Wait to you see the serious responses you'll get today and you will see that I'm one of the conservative ones. I'm 50 years old, classed as morbidly obese and I feel great. I have a fantastic life, great friends, a wonderful partner who loves me. Yet time after time I see the judgemental deluded gym junkies trying to give me advice. I take one look at their miserable lives and think no thanks. Great Topic Jeff. It should be fun.
Posted by FB4ME, 2/04/2009 8:59:47 AM
Are you still with us, FB4ME?
Posted by Jeff Corbett on 2/04/2009 9:23:19 AM
spot on Jeff, & incisive comment from the DS regarding the compulsion to immediately address hunger. I think there is a gender bias on that issue though. My wife is not a big eater, but when she's hungry she needs to eat RIGHT NOW. Try suggesting we wait an hour till dinner time - i did, but won't again. A side topic but relevant nonetheless - it was reported recently that we had overtaken the USA as the fattest nation on earth. Don't believe this report. What has in fact happened is that the method of data collection has changed from self assessment to independent assessment, but only in Australia. The Americans are still deluding themselves in their self assessments and are clearly larger than we are. Also, the "healthy weight range" is a flawed scale. I am 182cms tall, and tip in at 90kgs. According to the chart i am borderline obese. I assure you i am not, although a loss of 4-5kgs around the middle wouldn't kill me. Slightly overweight i can accept, but obese?? Who creates these charts, and what are they smoking?
Posted by fista, 2/04/2009 9:46:14 AM
Fista, I am not sure what weight chart you are looking at but your body mass index on your figures is 27. If you are a body builder this is fine, but you admit to a bit of lard around the middle - you are overweight (male, BMI over 25) but not obese (BMI over 30). On a more complicated note the problem now recognised is that not only are people getting more massive, their lean body weight (that is, the non-fat part) is getting less. Specifically people have less muscle than previous generations.
Posted by newtus, 2/04/2009 10:07:24 AM
I'm the same height as fista, and when I weighed the same the charts on the Department of Health website declared I too was pre-obese. If I recall correctly the charts listed my ideal weight as in the low to mid 70kgs, at which point I think I'd be in a hospital bed.
Posted by Jeff Corbett on 2/04/2009 10:13:30 AM
Jeff, is it not promoted by gym instructors that by the time you are hungry it is too late. Your body is already doing bad things, also the same for fluid intake, by the time you are thirsty, it's too late. I'm a moderation person, some days i eat too much others not at all. A friend told me once "live like a king, and eat like a peasant". While in Canada, it was imposible to get healthy food, fast food everywhere. You had to seek out fruit etc, I am told the USA is worse. What a lucky country Australia is that people die of overeating and not stavation.
Posted by Buell, 2/04/2009 10:09:19 AM
Yes, it seems almost obscene that many Australians, although perhaps not enough, seek out low-energy food to stay healthy.
Posted by Jeff Corbett on 2/04/2009 10:14:59 AM
I can claim a bit of expertise in this area, and BMI serves as a rough guide only - but certainly if you are on either side of normal BMI you should undergo more intensive examination. Waist to hip circumference ratio is useful, but a body composition analysis of body fat, lean muscle and body water gives a much better picture of one's health. As we age it is important to carry as much lean muscle mass as possible. FB4ME, while I don’t doubt you are happy just the way you are, I suspect you would become very unhappy very quickly if ever you found yourself in a situation where you needed to be active for any extended period of time. If you think being fit equates to a miserable life, I suspect you may be the deluded one.
Posted by Directeur Sportif, 2/04/2009 10:21:31 AM
Jeff - you are right. Nobody could feel 'happy' about being overweight. They may be generally happy with their life (more power to them), but not the specific issue of obesity. It's literally a killer. What beats me is that, as a society, we (rightly) tax the bejeezus out of tobacco and alcohol......but you can still buy a greasy burger, fries, soft drink and sundae at Maccas for under five bucks. Why don't we levy (tax) this junk to make it a less attractive proposition? At a population medicine level, it's as damaging as grog. I once worked with an attractive young employee who proudly announced that she routinely ate Maccas 3 times a day. I bet she's not so attractive now. She might well be dead. Maybe we need to go into schools with a bowl of fruit loops (aptly named...), stand up at assembly, and say "SEE THIS?? THIS AIN'T FRUIT!!".
Posted by StopPayingTheBludgers, 2/04/2009 10:25:43 AM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >
Jeff Corbett
Bend the online ear of the Hunter's most provocative columnist.

Most popular articles

Kloster No 1. Car Sale
 
Scholarships
 
Hamilton St Patricks Day
 
 
Travelworld_See the World
 
School Newspaper Competition
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...