As you know I am often taken to task for daring to present an opinion that clashes, for being foolish enough to put an argument that conflicts, and often I see that criticism as fair. But for reasons that are blatantly obvious on this blog, criticism from soccer suckers, tattooed idiots, Ulysseans, rottwielders and, pre 2010, four-wheel-drivers is never worth taking to heart.
You will have an opportunity this week to add to the load of criticism, because at this stage every year I write of what I see as my highs and lows of the year and invite your concurrence or otherwise. Today I write of my highs for the first half of the year, and please feel free to applaud or condemn my choices, to add to the list, to subtract from the list.
The columns and blogs I have in my list include: the alcohol at the teenagers' roadside shine (15.2), an abbreviated marriage not being necessarily a failed marriage (22.2), free chooks a better option that Lake council's $1800million food-waste bin (1.3), the mobile gnomes who are Ulysseans and their boilers (24.3), dining with dogs in Newcastle (16.4), keeping children and yourself left on Fernleigh Track (14.5), and the ethics of pet shop's selling pups and kittens (2.7). Tomorrow I look at the second half of the year, at least so far as the columns I'm prepared to own up to.
So, have I got it wrong, again?