Opinion 
 Blogs 
 Jeff Corbett 
 Islington's prostitution 

Islington's prostitution

Behind the house of an Islington family my wife knows is a lane that is used by the prostitutes who work Islington's streets as a toilet. They defecate in the lane - hey, this is a blog - they crap in the lane, and jammed in a gap in a fence is a rag they use to wipe their bum. That's out the back of the house. Out the front the pros are presenting as they do and the kerb crawlers or potential clients on foot are loitering with intent. Nearby are the pimps, ferals on BMX bikes often, and somewhere in the mix are drug dealers ready to make a sale as each prostitute returns from a business encounter.

The adults and children who live in these streets have to make their way through this every day and at any hour of the day and night. As I ride my bike through Islington on some Saturday mornings between 6am and 7.30am they're there, prostitutes and pimps; they're there during the day; and they're always there when I've been driving at night.

You wouldn't want these people in your street for any reason. They are the ugly end of humanity, and no talk of compassion, of their vulnerability, of their needs, will change the fact that you wouldn't want them in your street. And as I point out in my column today, NSW law says very clearly that they should not be and should not be permitted to be in Islington's residential streets or, for that matter, on the thoroughfare Maitland Road.

But so far Newcastle police have done nothing, or nothing effective, about moving them on. The State Member for Newcastle, Jodi McKay, and the Lord Mayor, John Tate, talk of cleaning the streets, and toilets, and closing and opening roads, and even setting up a street prostitution area on Kooragang Island, but no-one except the residents is demanding that police enforce the law. Perhaps they're worried the prostitutes will move to their neighbourhood.

What's your take on this?

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I'd be drenching the rag on that fence in chilli oil.
Posted by Jim M., 26/02/2009 6:51:14 PM
it might make 'count the prozzies' on the 11pm saturday bus from the uni a bit dull!
Posted by damien, 26/02/2009 7:30:41 PM
Well maybe someone should get the rag and put some HOT Chilly on it then put it back and see what happens. Maybe they think because it use to be the lane where the fastest car went the one with the large amount of piss tins in it. that they should use it still. No in all respect its dreadful and I know of a few that have had the same issue. This Act needs to be cleaned up on the streets and the back lanes.
Posted by tranquilityRose, 26/02/2009 9:54:58 PM
I hate prossies - they are scum.
Posted by City Lady, 27/02/2009 8:21:41 AM
drive them out...vigilante group lets unite lol..Im at tighes hill and ever since wealthy and law abiding people have bought and moved in to that area it is clean and safe..
Posted by simmo, 27/02/2009 9:14:09 AM
Sounds like someone wants to make big on their investment. It's Isso, and it always will be. These unfortunates have got to live somewhere and if you move there you got to accept it.
Posted by bemused, 27/02/2009 9:31:46 AM
It is a total farce, a joke. Tate and Mckay are hopeless. What if this happened outside John Tate's cozy little pad in New Lambton Heights?
Posted by StopPayingTheBludgers, 27/02/2009 9:54:06 AM
Simmo - you are dead right. Economics will force the scum to relocate.
Posted by StopPayingTheBludgers, 27/02/2009 9:55:56 AM
I wonder what would happen if I put in a DA for a brothel in this locale (or, for example, in John tate's neighbourhood)? When the Council inevitable (and rightly!) rejected it, I could take the Council to the Land and Environment court on the basis that they have unfairly discriminated against me. Bugger it, I might do that for a lark. See how they react.
Posted by StopPayingTheBludgers, 27/02/2009 10:06:00 AM
Bemused ~ are you suggesting that the law be disregarded in this case? Or that ALL of the hookers and their deadbeat hangers-on were there before ALL the residents? That simply makes no sense. I really think that people are simply wanting a decent neighbourhood. There are children in this scenario, and decent families, and a higher than average number of people that are decent, hardworking, but not "well off" Don't they deserve a safe, clean, neighbourhood? How about we move the problem to your street? There are workable solutions out there, but we seem to lack the wherewithal to implement them.
Posted by StopPayingTheBludgers, 27/02/2009 10:11:03 AM
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10  |  next >
Jeff Corbett
Bend the online ear of the Hunter's most provocative columnist.

Most popular articles

Hamilton St Patricks Day
 
Kloster No 1. Car Sale
 
 
Travelworld_See the World
 
EAO_The Loop
 
Scholarships
 
School Newspaper Competition
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...