Opinion 
 Blogs 
 Jeff Corbett 
 Other people die 

Other people die

My survival is proof that death happens only to other people, and so I am as untroubled by the RTA's roadside warnings SPEED KILLS as I used to be by cigarette packets' SMOKING KILLS. I read the RTA warning as SPEED KILLS OTHER PEOPLE, just as it used to be that SMOKING KILLS OTHER PEOPLE. It is very likely that you are the same, even if your confidence is not as well based as mine!

This notion of risk applying to others is the hardest nut to crack, and the RTA alluded to it late last week in responding to a Mercedes-Benz safety chief's statement that crash-avoidance systems and better roads would save more Australian lives than tougher speeding laws. I don't disagree with him, nor do I disagree with the RTA when it says that drivers believe that speeding, a major factor in road deaths, does not put them at risk.

Risk applies to other people. Just ask a smoker. On second thoughts, don't, because there's too much denial and obfuscation going on inside for a straight answer.

It is true that when I'm driving over the speed limit I do not countenance for even a millisecond the RTA's claim that I am subjecting myself, my passengers and other road users to extra risk. For starters, I'm speeding only a little bit, and that's all right, although it is true too that on the rare occasions that I speed a bigger bit I do so just as safely.

Risk applies to other people, and the fact that I'm here now is evidence of that.

Do you see risk applying to me instead of you? And is there a better way than the RTA's horror ads of making risk real?

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
How can anyone possibly doubt the RTA's pronoincements? Speeding by 1km/h increases your risk of a crash by 500%. 5km/h over causes prostate cancer, and 20km/h over will precipitate a zombie apocalypse - it's true, there's no such thing as safe speeding. I've read it on countless signs as I've sat at 15-20km/h over the posted limit on the F3 on no less than 1,000 crash-free journeys. Hang on... The RTA is run by a bunch of mindless ninnies - hell, it used to have a Vegan Cyclist as the minister in charge of it, under a Premier who didn't hold a driver's license. These people haven't a clue, they design inherently unsafe roads (M5 East with exit/ entry ramps on the right and no breakdown lanes), put overtaking land start and finish segments the wrong way around, fail to install proper wire rope median barriers, and are obsessed with putting as many speed zones as possible along any given lenght of road - meanwhile P-Platers are allowed to drive V6 Commodores but banned from 4cyl Diesel Mercs and Volvos - is it any wonder that nobody takes these clowns seriously? "How fast are you going now...?" - NOT FAST ENOUGH.
Posted by Scott Hillard, 8/03/2010 9:31:28 AM, on The Herald
In Australia road accidents kill about 1500 per year, alcohol 3000 per year and tobacco about 19000 per year. In about 30% of the road deaths alcohol plays a part. In all accidents at least one vehicle was where it should not have been, even if it's a driver denting her car while parking. The question is whether speed was responsible for the car being where it should not have been. That means the driver lost control due to excessive speed ending up where he should not be. The big secret of save driving is the ability to see into the future. You only need to know what's going to happen in the next five seconds and prepare for that. I've seen animals under cars parked next to the road which I had to pass, slowed down and avoided hitting them as they decided it was time to cross the road. On one or two occasions my wife asked me how did I know it was going to happen. My answer, 'because I'm a man', did not please her. On one occasion long ago slowing down because there were small kids playing with a ball on the pavement most likely saved a toddler. It's not so difficult - pay attention to what's on and near the road and think.
Posted by epaminondas, 8/03/2010 9:47:43 AM, on The Herald
I need to slow-down and re-read, I've exceeded the RTA's recommended typo limit by a factor of 100. My keyboard must be destined for a crash.
Posted by Scott Hillard, 8/03/2010 9:48:45 AM, on The Herald
Jeff - you are right. Re. smokers - they could put out a carton called "Death Sticks" with a skull and cross-bones on it, with large red lettering on the front saying: "YOU, [actual name of smoker], WILL DIE FROM SMOKING THESE. You will increase number of babies who die from SIDS. You stink and smell like an rubbish tip." and there would be no change in smoking numbers - it would probably increase among tough teenagers. Same with driving - I doubt there is anything they can do. There will always be d***heads, and they will always have car licences - and anything the RTA says to them will be of no avail.
Posted by Jaded, 8/03/2010 9:53:35 AM, on The Herald
Many years back -1998 - in Victoria a very large sign on Victorian roads had the saying "Drink and Drive you are a bloody idiot". There may have been other wording but that's all I remember. Also with some many unlicenced drivers, for whatever reason, legal violations of traffic laws etc I suggest the RTA should have ir-regularly a multi-point road blitz. By this I mean perhaps on 2 or 3 spots on F3 as well as other roads but they must be held SIMULTANEOUSLY and without prior notice to RTA or Police personnel -- the only way to overcome mobile phone use. For sure it will interupt traffic - why not, when it is for road safety. Also will probably indicate a few leakages in the RTA/Police services.
Posted by Bruce, 8/03/2010 10:22:59 AM, on The Herald
epaminondas, your post is spot on. Its all about predicting tha unpredictable, look and think. Driving down a backstreet with kids playing, the chances of one of the kids ending up on the road is pretty large. Driving in the country with a kangaroo hopping down the side of the road, it will move into the middle at some point so slow down and go past it at a slower speed. Same as driving in traffic, if there is a popular turn up ahead, people will be merging in front of you, instead of making them cut you off, predict what car is wanting to come over by looking at the car/ driver. Its not too difficult to predict behaviour of other cars and if you drive around in other cars blind spots, expet them to change lanes and wipe out the front of your car.
Posted by Nafe, 8/03/2010 10:28:01 AM, on The Herald
In the future our cars will all be microchipped speed limited,The cars will know what speed to govern the car to by the speed signs with trackers using GPS.There will be no need for speed cameras as the car will only respond up to the accepted speed then just sit on a speed until a traffic sign gives the cars chip a signal for increase or decrease depending on the zone.Yes people will break the law and take them off there cars but the fines will be severe like the removal of a digit or a skull and cross bone tatooed on your forhead.
Posted by horse, 8/03/2010 10:41:43 AM, on The Herald
Many big trucks are electronically speed limited now, Horse, but the drivers get around it with a screwdriver.
Posted by Jeff Corbett on 8/03/2010 11:03:45 AM
If anyone needs any more proof of the RTA's incompetence go to: http://smh.drive.com.au/motor-new s/rta-rewards-careful-young-drive rs--with-free-booze-20100307-pqlk .html in The Herald's sister publication The Sydney Morning Herald.
Posted by Steve, 8/03/2010 11:03:45 AM, on The Herald
Hmm. Of all the alarming figures on road accidents, alcohol related violence and all other manner s of doom and gloom, very few of my friends or family have been affected. Why? Because i don't hang out with loonies who drive like morons, or grubs who get smashed and pick fights (no disrespect to any innocent victims of either of these situations - i know it DOES happen). Perhaps part of the risk profile is a personality type, and it is not one i'm drawn to so i am rarely if ever affected by it. Put youself in a risky situation and obviously you're more likely to be affected. No guarantees it won't happen anyway, but we can easily minimise the risks
Posted by fista, 8/03/2010 11:59:24 AM, on The Herald
why do we make such a big fuss over the road toll? its extremely safe to be in a car on the road. in 2006 1668 people died from car accidents . not much when you consider the potential damage evry time 2 cars travelling at 60 k's pass each other on the road. this happens millions of times per day. by the way in the same year 1799 people died of suicide, and road deaths were even outdone by arthritis which accounted for 2079 deaths. yes geoff we are pretty safe and chances are it will not be me.
Posted by catl, 8/03/2010 12:11:13 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5  |  next >
Jeff Corbett
Bend the online ear of the Hunter's most provocative columnist.

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Bounce
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...