Opinion 
 Blogs 
 Jeff Corbett 
 Recycling garbage 

Recycling garbage

Newcastle City Council is hoping to cut my landfill garbage by half from January next year, using financial inducement to persuade me to take a 140-litre wheelie bin or even an 80-litre wheelie bin instead of the current 240-litre model. We'll keep the fortnightly recycling bin service and we'll gain a 240-litre green waste bin to be emptied, probably, fortnightly in summer and monthly in winter.

But as I write in The Herald today, I'd be cutting my bin space by much more than half since I now have access to a friend's garbage service she doesn't use, and my family has come to depend on that extra capacity.

I don't know why, or indeed whether, we create more rubbish than other families. There are four, sometimes five, of us at home, and in theory we should add relatively little to landfill. We rarely have takeaway, we cook using ingredients rather than packaged or processed food, we buy fruit and veg mostly at food markets without packaging, and all our organic waste goes to the chooks or the composter.

One issue may be compression, that we don't squash down our garbage well enough before we put it in the bin. Another is that almost certainly we don't recycle as well as we could. I used the word could rather than should there because I doubt recycling much of the stuff that goes in the garbage bin will help anyone. Indeed, I have a strong suspicion that it would end up going to landfill anyway. Are we supposed to put empty cans of food into the recycling? Food-smeared paper? Meat wrapping?

I have no doubt that most people will transfer much of their garbage into the recycling bin when the small bins arrive next January. My family and others will limit that to recyclables, others may not be so fussy.

Newcastle council is seeking to reduce its waste-disposal costs by reducing the amount it pays to the State Government as the state waste levy, at the moment $52 a tonne for landfill waste and soon to be substantially more. I believe, however, that if landfill quantities decrease the gluttonous State Government will simply increase the levy to maintain its revenue stream.

My family is going to give the half-size bin a burl but I suspect it's all a little pointless. That said, anything that might encourage a reduction in the obscene amount of resources that goes into packaging must be worth trying. Is there, though, a better way to go about it?

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
We should start with the grocery suppliers. As a point in question, I purchased a large packet of a national brand of cereals. Hoping to beat humidity, I also purchased a plastic sealable cereal container. When I got home, I opened the inner bag and found it to be about 3/4 full and only reaching about 2/3 the height of the outer package. I realise settlement takes place but the amount of waste in this one packet of cereal is obscene. If checked, I am in no doubt, the majority items in large wheelie Bins is throw away packaging from a food base. Cut down the amount and size of the wrappers/packaging = greatly minimise waste fill.
Posted by MizJasper, 23/02/2010 10:05:00 AM, on The Herald
Jeff - you don't recycle food cans?! you should be recycling everything you can - the NCC website has a list of dos and do nots. You should however keep your moustache clippings and sell them on eBay under "Celebrity items".
Posted by Cricket, 23/02/2010 10:09:27 AM, on The Herald
We've been hesitant to recycle cans coated with residue that will become offensive. I suppose we could wash them but I don't believe that is a long-term solution. We will nhow, of course, whack em all in the recycling.
Posted by Jeff Corbett on 23/02/2010 10:23:42 AM
No doubt this will now become a forum where people complain that their bins are getting smaller and that Council should let them continue to throw out however much rubbish they want. It's convenient isn't it, to have your rubbish collected at the door step and disposed of next door to someone else's house in another suburb!? I would suggest that, the suburb that produces the most rubbish per head of population be automatically nominated for the next Newcastle landfill site!
Posted by Humpty Potato, 23/02/2010 10:53:01 AM, on The Herald
I'll be surprised, HD, if most Australians don't recognise the value of reducing our waste.
Posted by Jeff Corbett on 23/02/2010 10:56:44 AM
The bottom line is costs incurred running a garbage collection service. And as mentioned if garbage is reduced the State Government levy will increase. We could go to the root cause of costings; maintenance of the NCC fleet, and wages and salaries. First, the custom and practice of "job and finish". We have garbos working 3 to five hours while being paid for eight for the last 50 or so years, probably longer. In an inner city suburb we have NCC general waste three man trucks. While the private contractor recycle collection services the same streets with a one man truck. So it stands to reason why not contract the waste services out to the private sector. The savings would be astronomical. Jeff what is happening within NCC is empire building at the needless expense to you and all of ratepayers in our local government area.
Posted by old boy, 23/02/2010 10:55:14 AM, on The Herald
Our recycling bin is full to the brim every time we put it out. Our general waste bin usually has maybe one bag in it, and sometimes it's not worth putting it out. We re-cycle everything that we can. We shred our personal details letters and put that in the compost. We wash/rinse cans before putting them in re-cycling. I did some temp work while at uni for a re-cycling company and it is BIG business. Yes some of it goes to landfill because some people don't recycle properly, but the majority does get sorted and sold as raw material. Our biggest problem is food over-packaging. Slowly over the years most of society have come to realise that gladwrap doesn't need to get used in every instance and there are ways of reducing in general.... but we have a long way to go.
Posted by leahkf, 23/02/2010 11:12:07 AM, on The Herald
Estimates from the waste services team based on an audit of the bins is that as much as 30% of waste in general waste bins is green waste. This change can help reduce the waste in landfill markedly, but would require 100% compliance to achieve a 30% reduction. State Govt waste levy last year was approx $12m from NCC. Massive savings are possible, but compliance is the key. If people keep the existing habits then no savings will result.
Posted by davey, 23/02/2010 12:12:04 PM, on The Herald
Food waste must make a bigger contribution to bin volumes than green waste, which I take to be garden and lawn clippings. We keep our food waste - as in unusable leftovers, leaves, corn cobs - separate and over a week this has a very significant volume. We give these scraps daily to our chooks, and from there they litter goes into the compost bin, and from there to the garden and fruit trees. With only one or two exceptions our green waste goes to compost. I do believe that encouraging Novocastrians to keep chooks and to use them in a chooks-garden-food-compost cycle will reduce landfill waste.
Posted by Jeff Corbett on 23/02/2010 12:31:48 PM
Jeff you just have to have a look at what is happening in Penrith at the moment with the waste resources reduction and what you will find is that it is not up to standard for the size of the City. Personally would a smaller 120L recycle bin work for my house = Yes. Would a smaller 120L normal waste bin work for my house = No, but would a household compost bin in every household in Newcastle as a waste reduction tool work? My opinion is Yes it would. Get ready for the problems to follow with the reduction of the waste whiz bins as they should of tested it under the recycle bins to see if it would be a viable solution to waste management. Simple way of saying it : Would a 120L waste whiz bin work in a household of 5 ? I think not!
Posted by The Real Tough Titties, 23/02/2010 12:22:55 PM, on The Herald
Council should be focussing on their core services rather than focusing on extra corricular activities. If there is a budget problem, you don't cut down a core responsibility, you cut the optional extras. People bitch and moan about "oh we cant cut the Loft" but when i was growing up there was no Loft, no Graffiti wall, only a standard museum which you only attended at school excursions, same with the standard are gallery. Things like a brand new art gallert, brand new museum, the Loft, are all nice things to have but if you have budget retraints, they should be the first things cut. Take your home budget for example, if your budget is beeing squeezed, you don't cut down on eating do you? you cut the foxtel off first. Same should go with Council, keep the necesities and cut the luxaries untill you can afford them.
Posted by Nafe, 23/02/2010 12:25:58 PM, on The Herald
I'll just dump my excess garbage on the steps of City Hall - it will blend in nicely with the rest of the CBD. Or I might drive up the hill a few hundred metres from home and dump it there amongst the biggest load of garbage you'll find in Newcastle. I can only imagine how a household with 2 or more infants will cope with this - a reduced bin might be fine for single householders or eco-hippies that hang teabags out to dry so they can be reused, but seriously - it would be funny if the clowns responsible weren't being fed by my rate and tax dollars. NCC outgoings could be trimmed by 20% within 5 minutes of anyone with a triple-digit IQ taking charge. Seems that the current crop of clowns are determined to destroy any notions that the last council was the worst in the history of the city.
Posted by Scott Hillard, 23/02/2010 2:34:02 PM, on The Herald
Nafe when a core service chews up so much of the budget it is prudent to review the service and see where savings can be made. Waste Services pays >$12m per annum in waste levies to an incompetent state govt, and gets nothing in return. Like the Loft, this expense wasn't around when we were lads and is only going to increase along with the water and electricity (an aside, but the increase in water and electricity rates will negatively imapct NCC budget by close to $1m this financial year). A change in the service, in line with the majority of councils in NSW (including almost all in Sydney) to reduce this waste levy is a sensible move. Does it go far enough? Not nearly in my opinion, but it's agood start. There is no way a household should generate >240litres of non-recycleable or composable waste each and every week (on occassions we all will, but not every week). If anyone does, then they need to have a good long hard look at themselves. If we keep doing what we're doing, we'll keep getting what we're getting. Anyone happy with what we're getting??????
Posted by fista, 23/02/2010 2:39:31 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >
Jeff Corbett
Bend the online ear of the Hunter's most provocative columnist.

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Bounce
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...