Bodybuilders shave their legs and bodies - wankers! Swimmers shave too - lairs! And male models, of course - ponces! Cyclists, on the other hand, shave their legs for good reason, and right now, as a cyclist, I'm trying to decide which reason.
They range, as I list them in my column in The Herald today, from easier bandaging and removal of gravel, through aerodynamics to less cover for ticks. Cyclists start searching for a reason, or excuse, to shave their legs when their legs have developed cycling muscle, the rippling that is best shown off when hairless.
I've been spurred to shave (or wax) by someone admiring my calves the other day and an approaching long ride from Coolangatta, during which there'll be ample opportunity to present hairless calves for admiration, but choosing an excuse is not the only challenge. There's also the question of how far up. And whether to apply a bottle tan.
Can you help (with advice)? Which, for example, is best, shave or wax? Does shaved hair really grow back stronger? And would you like to see before and after photos?