Australia's new houses have just become bigger than those of supersized America, and if we needed a wake-up from our burgeoning wastefulness this should be it. An Australian Bureau of Statistics report prepared for Commonwealth Securities has found that not only does the average size of our new houses exceed America's, it does so by 13 square metres, 215 square metres to 202 square metres. Kiwis come in third, with 196 square metres, and it's a big drop to Denmark in fourth with 137 square metres.
In my column in The Herald today I put forward that, after location, house size is the great measure of status in Australia. The car is simply a take-out expression of that status, something to stake the claim to those who don't see the house.
Our obsession with house size as status began, I think, with my generation, people who left school in the 1960s and '70s. It was when we became house buyers, perhaps 10 years later, that the size of houses started increasing in leaps and bounds. Suddenly our parents' houses were cramped boxes that could never have housed a family! When we ordered a new house, we ordered big and we borrowed bigger. When we bought someone's parents' house, we extended with a loan that extended us. And houses and extensions have been getting bigger since.
Do you agree that house size is about something other than comfort? And will it end? Will soaring energy costs bring us to our senses?