A Charles Sturt University sociologist midway through a four-year study of treechangers has found that 90 per cent of them are so disenchanted they want to move, if not back to the city then elsewhere. And that matches my observation of friends and acquaintances who take the plunge, often suddenly and bravely, to leave the city for the bush.
My wife and I have come close a few times, although as I write in my column in The Herald today we have dropped the idea for five years or so after visiting people who have made the move. I find it interesting that we, and I'd imagine most or all treechangers, are aware of the disadvantages cited by treechangers in the study by Dr Angela Ragusa, yet we've refused to allow these disadvantages to impinge on the image of our rural oasis.
First, consider the advantages: more time to talk, more "common" faces, flexibility between work and family, safety (not always), sustainability, community help in crisis.
That didn't take long, did it?
Now consider the disadvantages: boredom, forced
adjustment to lifestyle habits (eg, shopping hours), lower pay and disposable income, fewer work options, no or little public transport, more time driving,
poor medical access, difficulty making friends, not fitting in, missing social networks left behind, drought, higher living costs, fewer quality cultural activities, conservatism and narrow-mindedness, lack of entertainment, lack of ethnic diversity, poor roads, absence of higher education facilities.
Phew!
Have you dreamed of a treechange or a seachange? Realised that a watered city lawn is greener? Have you made the change? We'd love to read about the move you didn't make or the move you did make.