Opinion 
 Blogs 
 Jeff Corbett 
 TV commercials 

TV commercials

What do television watchers do during the commercial breaks? Do they stay seated for the commercials? Do they put their mind into some kind of suspension, stare blankly at the screen, enter some sort of dozing consciousness? Or do they watch, listen and absorb?

Every few years when I turn on the teev to watch a particular event at the Olympic or Commonwealth games I am staggered by the duration and number of commercial breaks. And so I found myself in shock when I flicked to Channel Ten one night last week to watch an hour or so of the Commonwealth Games. I know commercials are the price we pay for commercial television, but, truly, I find it hard to believe that a significant number of people are prepared to pay the price.

I tried watching the ads, and for a while I was interested that they fell so short of generating any interest in the consumer called Jeff Corbett. I mean, advertisers knew I was watching sport, and they had a fair idea which sport; they know that a substantial proportion of viewers were in my age group; they know we have spending power, and they know I'm male, but not once did they push any of my buttons.

Not that I watched for long. The frantic flicking between camera snaps was strangely tiring, and the noise was much more demanding and invasive than that of the program. Finally I hit the mute button and read a mag, restoring the sound when I noticed the games had returned.

Late last week I looked up the free-to-air television industry's code of practice, and first I went to the "loudness in advertisements" section. Commercials, it may interest you, must not be "excessively noisy or strident", and stations "must do everything reasonably possible to ensure that commercials do not sound louder than adjacent programming"! Aah, but the station is excused from these requirements if the person submitting the commercial says it meets the code.

The code stipulates, too, that a station not have more than 15 minutes of commercials in an hour during an evening, no more than an average of 14 minutes in any four evening hours, and no more than an average of 13 minutes in the six hours to midnight. There are quite a few ifs and buts, and few complaints and fewer findings of a breach of the code. The Australian Communications and Media Authority tells me, for example, that in the past year it investigated three complaints of excessive commercial time and dismissed all of them. Not that it matters much. The code is voluntary, breaching it is not an offence, and there are no penalties.

And I suppose people can exercise a choice not to watch. Are you happy with the time out for time in? How do you respond to television's commercial breaks? And do you see the trade of 14 or 15 minutes of commercials an hour a fair trade for a television program?

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
A well written article Jeff, ...not wanting to piss in ones pocket but you have pretty well nailed, having said that, watch this blog turn into an India bashing session . I wait in anticipation, people will not be able to help themselves... Back to the article. It. really is a case of 45 minutes of ads and 15 minutes of bullshit isnt it! (although your sums were a bit different to mine it still adds up to the same) Honestly, who wants to watch Australia verse the rest of the Commonwealth (ad nauseum), These games are a bit of a joke, considering track and field competitors such as Usian Bolt gave it a wide berth, it really is a case of Australia first and daylight second. The only break the poor downtrodden public can get is the ads, I guess the one thing these games will do is it will give fuel to the anti indian fraternity of which I am sure there are many . I spent a bit of time with a few Indians from Madras last year, they were wonderful people
Posted by sid, 11/10/2010 3:47:49 AM, on The Herald
It's great to know that I am not on my own with this one. The Bush Princess reckons that I am just an impatient old B.... Anyway unashamedly I am a channel surfer and if the stations havn't colluded to put their ads on at the same time (and I reckon they do) it is possible to maintain the story line in a couple of programmes at the same time. I actually enjoy the radio more these days because you can continue on doing something rather than watch adverts that are basicly just an insult to our intelligence.
Posted by Bush Bunny, 11/10/2010 5:26:16 AM, on The Herald
Very rarely turn on my ancient TV. I do like funny ads though - cleverly thought out ads that make me laugh. Like the stupid Hippi that accosts the man shopping at Woolies - that cracks me up - that is so likely to happen to me - I seen to attract wacko's! Funny. I loved the bloke driving home with imaginary Rappers in the car - and forgot the nappies - I laughed every time I saw it! Silly, but funny. Gotta have a laugh. But the time I do set aside to watch, I just sit and watch. It's my rest moment. Usually news or info stuff. I'm too busy working and doing interesting things to wacth TV.
Posted by Rose- Lake Macquarie, 11/10/2010 5:33:38 AM, on The Herald
The Wife and I surf the other channels while the Ads are on, or we mute the TV and chat, or do something else, but the amount of advertising on Free to Air TV is going ridiculous, we used to have Pay TV, but the Advertising on that became so bad we had that disconnected. In recent weeks we have started recording a lot of Shows and then we watch them later so we can fast forward through the adverts (Just look at how many Ads are in a program like Top Gear!) Classic case, The Bathurst 1000 coverage on Channel 7 was switched from being a live broadcast to a "Time Shifted" broadcast all for the sake of jamming in more adverts. I will say one positive from all the advertising on TV, I watch less of it and spend more time outside doing other activities. Our TV has never spent so much time switched off!
Posted by Captain Stubing, 11/10/2010 5:42:53 AM, on The Herald
When the adverts are on, it's the only time my crew are actually quiet in front of the TV. Thats more annoying than the adverts themselves!
Posted by Dave B, 11/10/2010 5:51:59 AM, on The Herald
For myself, I record the show and then fast-forward through all commercials. I am sure the technology is available to do this automaticle but no doubt the advertisers will see that it never sees the public light of day.
Posted by Tiger, 11/10/2010 7:37:22 AM, on The Herald
most of the 15 minutes allowed per hour would be taken up by that annoying ad for orangutan that runs every 5 mins. they must have a bigger advertising budget than coke.
Posted by catl, 11/10/2010 7:48:19 AM, on The Herald
television sucks. i loath the ads. i had foxtel until they put ads on it. i hated the idea of paying to watch ads. something very wrong with that concept. so does that mean JC, that 1/4 of the time television is on during "prime time", it is taken up with advertising? advertising that is blatantly louder than the show itself..... the ads blare at you, there is no doubt about that.
Posted by judgedredd, 11/10/2010 7:53:58 AM, on The Herald
Yep, a quarter of the time. Seems to me, though, to be much more than one quarter.
Posted by Jeff Corbett on 11/10/2010 8:01:52 AM
The mute button Jeff. Hit the mute button and then you can replace their annoying rants with your own commentary. As for those really annoying commercials, I make sure I never buy the product. To think, watching 5 hours of commercial TV per night robs one of some 1.25 hours of their life makes watching TV more dangerous than smoking.
Posted by MizJasper, 11/10/2010 8:03:49 AM, on The Herald
I encourage everyone to get foxtel IQ, tivo or similar. We record all our shows (can record 2 at once and watch a third). We then start our programs around 20 minutes late and fat forward all the adds! you can asily fit 2 hours of TV into a little over an hour by tracking through adds! The other thing many people of my generation to to avoid ad's is to simply illegally download TV shows from the US without the ad breaks! problem solved!
Posted by HUmpty, 11/10/2010 8:05:30 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >
Jeff Corbett
Bend the online ear of the Hunter's most provocative columnist.

Most popular articles




Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...