News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 11th-hour vote buys figs time 

11th-hour vote buys figs time

17 Nov, 2010 03:00 AM
ACTIVISTS applauded last night after Newcastle City Council voted to stall the chainsaws set to cut down Laman Street's massive fig trees.

A last-minute motion by Labor councillor Nuatali Nelmes, asking the council to hold off on the removal of the trees, was passed seven votes to five.

Lord mayor John Tate backed the resolution that will prevent the council from removing the trees until it has investigated a "pull test", which groups battling to save the trees believe will prove they are not a safety risk.

Of the councillors who originally voted to remove the trees because they posed a safety risk, only Cr Tate supported last night's motion.

Members of Save Our Figs and the Parks and Playgrounds Movement had earlier yesterday pleaded with Newcastle City Council to keep the trees until at least the end of the month as they prepared an appeal against last week's NSW Land and Environment Court ruling.

The court ruled that the council had the right to remove the trees, which could have come down as early as Friday when an injunction was to be lifted.

The legal team acting on behalf of the community groups had contacted the council's solicitors and asked for the injunction to be extended, as they needed more time to prepare their appeal.

Last night's motion requires the council to investigate a pull test which activists have claimed would cost about $30,000 and was the best way to prove determine whether the figs needed to be removed.

Cr Mike Jackson said he would support the motion, because the cost of a pull test was significantly less than the council faced in legal bills if further court action was taken.

Cr Aaron Buman, who said protesters trying to save the trees were "some of the rudest people I've ever met" also attempted to move a motion to keep the figs indefinitely.

He said activists had "worn me down".

The motion also prevents the trees from being removed until the council has finalised its civic master plan.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Another $30k wasted.... So will members of Save our Figs and Parks and Playgrounds Movement chip (no pun intended) in for the payment? I doubt it because they are only good at spending other peeps money. Just keep pulling to they all come down. Why have a legal system/council?
Posted by R Plantagenet, 17/11/2010 8:45:26 AM, on The Herald
The continuing saga of "THE FIG". Will they get the chop or not, don't miss next weeks thrilling chapter of "THE FIG", bought to you exclusively by the Herald and sponsored by NCC.
Posted by intouch, 17/11/2010 9:05:01 AM, on The Herald
For goodness sake give these figs an almighty tug in the the hope that they come out of the ground roots and all.
Posted by thinkitthrough, 17/11/2010 9:19:20 AM, on The Herald
i do have concerns that council actually have an agenda aside from safety concerns.
Posted by judgedredd, 17/11/2010 9:53:28 AM, on The Herald
No surprise that the Lord Mayor would reverse his stance. There's a much high chance of his opinion changing with the wind than a fig falling over.
Posted by grub, 17/11/2010 10:01:11 AM, on The Herald
"Why have a council/legal system?"

Dont' worry R Plantagenet. The community action to save the figs is all about the council/legal system working the way it should

.It's about checks and balances to address unreasonable or incompetent council actions.

Cr Buman accusing people of being "some of the rudest people I've ever met"?

As someone who has many, many times had to endure Cr Buman's behaviour, I can only marvel at the deep irony of his statement.

Posted by council watcher, 17/11/2010 10:02:03 AM, on The Herald
Is John Tate trying on the old "I'm a good guy after all" trick?
Posted by Seven of eight, 17/11/2010 10:25:44 AM, on The Herald
Ignoring the thousands that have spoken out and worked to keep these trees is not a wise move. If that is the number who have spoken with a signature than you can make a accurate mathematical calculation here that most of Newcastle are on the side of these trees. Remember the Law of Averages in this case the trees win then why can a handful of people on the Council stop this. It is a case of cutting their own throat. Remember this is a democracy.
Posted by PK, 17/11/2010 10:38:06 AM, on The Herald
The vocal minority wins again. Is there any point electing a council and employing professionals?
Posted by Max Best, 17/11/2010 11:06:16 AM, on The Herald
Concern, Judge? You can bet your house on it. What a debacle - and now the only Councillor showing leadership and sense is aligned with the ALP - how did it come to this? Leave the damn trees there, one Tyrell St disaster is more than the city can bear - 2 such disasters? No thanks. All of these panicky little cowardly clowns who are so terrified of a tree falling on their heads should stay the hell away from Laman St and let the rest of us go about our business - in the shade.
Posted by Scott Hillard, 17/11/2010 11:12:03 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...