News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 $1.5bn Huntlee project quashed 

$1.5bn Huntlee project quashed

07 Jul, 2011 04:50 PM
The rezoning of land for the controversial $1.5 billion Huntlee New Town project at Branxton has been quashed for a second time.

The NSW Land and Environment Court has overturned Huntlee’s gazettal as a ‘‘state significant site’’.

Justice Peter Biscoe upheld the Sweetwater Action Group’s challenge to the state’s biggest housing development for up to 20,000 people.

The group argued a voluntary planning agreement for the development was not enforceable.

Justice Biscoe ordered that the respondents, Huntlee Pty Ltd and the Minister for Planning, pay the group’s court costs, subject to considering any requests lodged tomorrow morning.

Sweetwater Action Group spokesman Chris Parker said outside the court this afternoon that the decision showed the ‘‘little guy’’ could win.

The development’s state significant listing was previously quashed in the wake of another Land and Environment Court decision that conservation land offsets under unlawful "deeds of agreement" constituted a "land bribe".

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Well done SWAG! it just shows that just because they have the money they don't necessarily have the brains to be developers.

You don't make the grade by lying to the residents, and all in all a huge pot of bribery and corruption!

They say money speaks all languages - just not SWAG language or our local dialect!

GIVE UP LWP - this is not a State Significant Site and never will be.

You can fool the people in WA - not the residents of Branxton and North Rothbury.

Posted by Stopthecorruption, 7/07/2011 5:21:01 PM, on The Herald
Congratulations to Chris Parker and all those involved in SWAG's just cause- you won against all the odds and showed that a good cause is indeed worth fighting for. Many of us wondered how such an unsuitable site could ever be promoted to the status of State Significant Site. After all, the experts in the State Planning Department had placed it last in a lengthy list of sites for possible development when the draft Hunter Region Development Plan was first presented to the public. The developers never offered any valid explanation for how and why it was elevated from its lowly status .
Posted by clarence, 7/07/2011 5:37:03 PM, on The Herald
well done to all the people involved who have worked long and hard to stop this project.

it gives us ordinary people hope that justice will prevail over developers who think they can overide the wishes of the majority. just the start, local people will have a say in what happens in their area. again. well done.

Posted by ollie, 7/07/2011 6:28:00 PM, on The Herald
WELL WHAT CAN BE SAID I THINK THE COURT CASES HAVE SAID IT ALL. GO FIHD SOME SUITABLE LAND ALREAD Y MOSTLY CLEARED ;NOT AN OLD MINE LEASE WITH CONTINUED SUBSIDANCE UP THE VALLEY CLOSER TO THE EVERMOVING MINING EMPLOYMENT AND TRY AGAIN WE NEVER CHOSE TO LIVE A COUNTRY LIFESTLLE SURROUNDER BY A MONSTROTITY
Posted by nige, 7/07/2011 7:02:32 PM, on The Herald
Another demonstration of how hopeless Cessnock Council is. Great for the locals of Branxton & Nth Rothbury. And great to see Councillor Chris Parker standing up against these money grabbing companies.
Posted by DMA, 7/07/2011 7:41:36 PM, on The Herald
More jobs down the drain.
Posted by Muriel, 7/07/2011 8:00:34 PM, on The Herald
Correct planning and consultation is all that we ask. That obviously does not include corruption, bribery and lack of competance.

On the other hand more houses are very important especially for our young people and they have to be put somewhere.

Posted by Bigfeller, 7/07/2011 8:21:11 PM, on The Herald
So the Land & Environment Court has found what the The Govt's senior planning bureaucrats & the community new all along.

Bad location! Bad planning! Inadequate transport! DUMB! DUMB! DUMB! So they'll decide court costs. What about the 1000's of hours of unpaid community time spent fighting this Dumb Dumb Dumb political overriding of sensible planning.

Posted by edteech, 7/07/2011 8:55:08 PM, on The Herald
YES BIGFELLA GO FIND THEM SOME NICE CLEARED LAND ELSWHERE AND LEAVE OUR LITTLE VILLAGES ALONE, SRORE PEOPLE NEED SOMEWHERE TO LIVE BUT NOT ON AN OLD UDERGROUND MINING THAT HAS CONTINUAL SUBSIDANCE PROBLEMS AND IS SO CONTOMINATED BY THE WASHING OF COAL ONTHE SITE. TAILING CELLS FULL OF MAGANITE AND SULPHUR THEN ALL THE REJERCT DUMPS RUBBISH DUMPS AND GRAVEL QUARRIES , WHAT A JOKE TO EVEN CONSIDER THIS SITE,
Posted by nige, 7/07/2011 9:29:40 PM, on The Herald
Yes Bigfella we do need houses for the young people. Huntlee was number 91 on the list so these young people should look a bit higher up the list and find a place more suitable.
Posted by Stopthecorruption, 8/07/2011 9:00:03 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...