News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 40% oppose Tillegra dam 

40% oppose Tillegra dam

01 Jul, 2010 04:00 AM
THE push to have the controversial Tillegra Dam project shelved has gained more momentum after a survey revealed more than 40 per cent of Hunter residents oppose the $477-million project.

The Hunter Valley Research Foundation survey, commissioned by the Newcastle Herald, showed 21 per cent of surveyed residents disagreed with the dam's building and another 20 per cent were strongly against the proposal.

It follows a Roy Morgan Research survey in December, which showed less than one in four Hunter residents surveyed about the proposed dam supported its construction.

The latest survey indicated the Tillegra debate had fallen on most ears, with more than eight in 10 respondents aware of the project at some level.

Only 6.2 per cent strongly backed the dam and 15.8 per cent agreed it should go ahead.

Greens MP John Kaye said the results were evidence "public relations spin" from Hunter Water had failed to hide the reality of an "unnecessary, expensive and damaging" dam.

"Hunter Water has failed to hoodwink the community," he said.

"Almost twice as many people have seen through the utility's propaganda as have fallen for the myth that the Hunter needs a new dam."

Dr Kaye said a decision to push ahead with the project despite support from less than a quarter of residents would cost political seats in the Hunter.

No Tillegra Dam Group chairwoman Carol Pasenow said the community had never truly believed that the dam was justified or needed.

Hunter Water would not comment on the survey and released a statement saying it had a responsibility to provide clean, safe drinking water for the Hunter population.

The survey involved telephone interviews with 310 Hunter residents.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
These greens are wolves in sheeps clothing. Not only do they want to cut off our cheap coal electricity, ruin our cars, and prevent us eating meat, now they want to stop us drinking a glass of water.
Posted by Penny, 1/07/2010 4:35:50 AM, on The Herald
A truly independent poll, a survey of the Hunter people by their own newspaper and it has shown that there is great concern about building this unnecessary dam. It is also noted that Hunter Water as nothing to say about this, where are their spin doctors on this one?
Posted by Dave, 1/07/2010 6:35:16 AM, on The Herald
"a responsibility to provide clean, safe drinking water for the Hunter population" What has this got to do with trying to justify the Tillegra dam proposal? Hunter Water published in October 2006 (Newcastle Herald) it may not EVER need Tillegra Dam. Why did Kevin Young announce in Dungog on December 16, 2006 that it was a political decision? The Premier's Department representative at the same meeting told us all to vote in March, 2011 if we did not like it. Well we will. And it looks like a lot of other Hunter Water ratepayers are going to do the same. A clean out of Labor politicians and their compliant bureaucrats is what is needed.
Posted by George, 1/07/2010 7:07:49 AM, on The Herald
Hunter Water's March/June newsletter clearly outlines how it will provide clean,safe drinking water for the future. There is no mention of Tillegra Dam. Why? Why not?
Posted by Kate, 1/07/2010 7:10:10 AM, on The Herald
My concern is that the Hunter Water Corporation are beating their own drum. They want the dam, they want the Hunter Residents to pay for it. They get the water and they determine who they sell it to "Mines or whoever" and the Hunter Residents don't get any thing in return for their forced investment. The NSW State Government is just a puppet to the Hunter Water Corporation
Posted by Resident, 1/07/2010 8:07:31 AM, on The Herald
40% is not the majority .... so build the "dam" thing!!!!
Posted by mik, 1/07/2010 10:39:25 AM, on The Herald
Everyone knows minorities rule this country - what a joke. Build it now or pay later.
Posted by Ming, 1/07/2010 10:59:23 AM, on The Herald
So if my maths are right, 60% of people DONOT oppose the dam...should the Herald have been saying that the majority of people support the dam.
Posted by Thirsty, 1/07/2010 11:04:23 AM, on The Herald
They have never given a plausible explanation as to why this dam is suddenly essential. I'm afraid I suspect a hidden agenda - water for mining which has taken over the Hunter. What is happening to democracy in this country? It is being dismantled at all levels by multinational interests/big business. Unless we all wake up and start paying attention to what is going on, soon we really will have no say at all.
Posted by pattythepleb, 1/07/2010 11:26:33 AM, on The Herald
Surely the whole debacle is to satisfy the drinking water needs of Sydney - the pipeline is already halfway there to the Central Coast - I guess Hunter Water will want Hunter users to pay for the missing half of the pipeline when the dam is finished! Go Jodie, away.
Posted by greenant, 1/07/2010 11:30:35 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...