News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Boycott on skin cancer clinic at Mater Hospital 

Boycott on skin cancer clinic at Mater Hospital

26 Nov, 2009 10:35 AM
AT least one doctor is boycotting the Newcastle Melanoma Unit's new premises at the Mater Hospital as the unit's director of research yesterday slammed its forced relocation.

The unit's medical clinics were moved this week from the NBN Telethon building at Waratah across Platt Street to the main Mater building.

The unit's director of research, Professor Peter Hersey, said yesterday the change to the new clinics had been "chaotic", with files missing and a shortage of space.

He said patients ringing the melanoma unit's main 4985 0100 number were greeted by a disconnected signal with no explanation or message.

Professor Hersey said one of the unit's four visiting medical officers had told the Mater he would not hold clinics until they were returned to the Telethon building.

He said Mater general manager Colin Osborne seemed determined to "destroy" the unit and that his research was being hampered by a "a turf war" started by some Mater oncologists who apparently resented the unit's stand-alone status.

Professor Hersey said two new drug trials approved by the hospital's ethics committee were unlikely to go ahead because the Mater said he could not be accredited to give chemotherapy despite having done so for more than 25 years.

He said specialist cameras and melanoma-detection equipment had been left behind in the Telethon building because there was no room in the space allocated in the Mater building.

"The early detection of melanoma is the key to treatment and some melanomas can be very hard to see, so the failure to detect them at examination is becoming a major cause of medical litigation," Professor Hersey said.

Mr Osborne called the arguments of Professor Hersey and the melanoma unit's former director, Dr Bob Sillar, "specious".

In a letter to The Herald last week Dr Sillar said the move would have "a devastating effect" on the provision of melanoma services in the Hunter.

Mr Osborne said he "rejected, absolutely and outright" the notion he was destroying the unit.

He confirmed one doctor had written with concerns but said he had responded to that doctor.

He rejected claims the Mater had restricted patient access to the clinic, saying it had 324 patients booked in at the start of October and saw another 27 unscheduled patients for a total of 351 patients. It had 317 booked in at the start of November.

Mr Osborne acknowledged some minor problems in moving the clinics to the Mater and said the issues were being dealt with.

He said a "molemax" camera that Professor Hersey had complained he had been left without was used only occasionally and he believed space could be found for the equipment.

He supported the decision not to "sign off" on two of Professor Hersey's upcoming drug trials.

"What was appropriate two years ago is not necessarily appropriate in 2009," Mr Osborne said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What about the people who need treatment or don't they matter.
Posted by Jimbob, 26/11/2009 12:07:58 PM
I have recently been diagnosed with a melanoma and have found the staff and doctors at the unit to be second to none. This debacle had better be sorted out ASAP before lives are put at risk. Sun Cancer is a very serious business and should not be mucked around with.
Posted by Ianola%0d%0ai, 26/11/2009 12:18:44 PM
What a joke the sisters of Mercy ran the hospital better!
Posted by Paccy, 26/11/2009 12:20:45 PM
Don't get mixed up in these medical turf wars - usually nothing to do with patient care. Except that we are paying their salaries while they waste time arguing amongst themselves!
Posted by Clare, 26/11/2009 2:15:22 PM
Jimbob, I guess when professionals engage in power plays and empire reconstruction nothing else matters.
Posted by jim2bob, 26/11/2009 2:16:55 PM
Mr Osborne said; "evidence of non-compliance with professional nursing standards and hospital policy was the reason for this action." He is absolutely correct in taking this step. There was a critical need for his action, and he should be applauded for it.
Posted by Melanoma Patient, 26/11/2009 4:58:10 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
26 November, 2009

Most popular articles

 
Scholarships
 
Klosters Golf GTI
 
Travelworld_See the World
 
Rovert
 
School Newspaper Competition
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...