News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Call for ruling on Hunter coalmining areas 

Call for ruling on Hunter coalmining areas

27 May, 2010 04:00 AM
A PEAK mining lobby has asked the NSW Government to decide which parts of the Hunter are fair game for coalmining companies and which parts are off limits.

The Government rejected plans for the Bickham coalmine this month, estimated by proponents to be worth $150 million to the area's economy, to protect the horse breeding industry.

Deputy chief executive of the NSW Minerals Council Sue-Ern Tan said yesterday that the miners wanted to know where they stood.

"We need the Government to take a leadership role to set out a vision for the region about how those competing land uses can work," Ms Tan said.

The minerals council has written to the Government to make 11 recommendations ahead of this year's budget, calling for a strategic land use plan of mining regions.

"This approach would allow the benefits and costs of different land use patterns to be assessed up front, helping shape future development in the region and creating a vision that all stakeholders can embrace," it said.

The call for a land use study has been backed by thoroughbred breeders.

Arrowfield stud proprietor John Messara said industries needed certainty.

"You need to know you can invest in the Hunter without being surprised with a mine next door or one kilometre away," he said.

"Surely the Government can have a good look around and see the areas that should be protected from mining and what can be mined."

The minerals council has also called for the Hunter to get a better deal from mining royalties.

Ms Tan said coal companies contributed to the Hunter with employment and sponsorship of sports teams, community groups and charities.

Minister for Mineral Resources Ian Macdonald did not comment on the recommendations yesterday.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Mining is vital for jobs and prosperity in the Hunter. We need to get tough with those who seek to stop mining aiming to reduce our standard of living. There is nothing peaceful or harmless about protests which would turn Australia into another slum of Asia.
Posted by Alf, 27/05/2010 4:54:57 AM, on The Herald
"competing land uses" I suppose that is a milestone admission of sorts. At least Coal Mining Companies ( not MINERS!) are finally being honest about the fact that ppl cannot & should not, have to live with mining impacts. Oh & few footbal jerseys arent really paying a fair share! Once upon a time MINERS real pick & shovel MINERS, would have deductions from their wages to build hospitals for their communities!
Posted by Black Lung, 27/05/2010 8:09:43 AM, on The Herald
Isn't this what State Planning are supposed to do? Manage competing interests for the benefit of all, rather than for the benefit of one? Can open cut mining and people co-exist in close proximity? If horses can't breathe the dust, can our kids?
Posted by more_planning_please, 27/05/2010 8:37:03 AM, on The Herald
The same has to be done for the filthy Coal Seam Gas industry.
Posted by Peter Firminger - Wollombi, 27/05/2010 8:46:01 AM, on The Herald
While it may be too late I could write Minister McDonald's new rules on mining as the following. No mining open cut or underground near any alluvial flats. No mining within 1 km of any significant population centre and the ban on any mining in/under national parks to remain. Sadly it's too late for the proximity restriction for Muswellbrook and Singleton.
Posted by pablo, 27/05/2010 9:32:08 AM, on The Herald
If certain areas are so valuable to the miners, is it not possible to go ahead with underground mining?. This could be a solution to proposed mines deemed too close to residential areas and/or towns. This could be a win win for everyone, but the transporting of the coal would have to also be kept away from these areas. Surely it's possible to come to a solution for all to benefit.
Posted by Wally, 27/05/2010 9:48:16 AM, on The Herald
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!!! This question has been around for a long time as people have always wan't to know what areas they can safely invest their families life savings and efforts. The NSW Gov have allways kept the next mining lease issue close to the their chest as they like to defeat residents in small groups at a time rather be faced with larger regional groups up in arms over their environment &homes being put on death row. Consider the people who have had this hanging over the heads West of Muswellbrook for 15 yrs. They cant sell as their properties which are to be resumed for mining, they can't improve their properties as they will get no compensation they just have to sit and wait for the miners pleasure. They can't move away as their properties are not yet required for mining. They have suffered considerable emotional and mental distress due to this mining system and they will receive no compensation for the 15yrs of anguish they have suffered. We need a regional plan for new mining areas but more inportantly what is the exit strategy? who if any one is going to clean up the mess? The rush to consume the Hunter Valley has no back up plan to repair the damage.
Posted by SPARKS, 27/05/2010 9:49:43 AM, on The Herald
this is why the hunter valley is now the disaster area it is.... there has basically been no planning or regulation. the mines have been allowed to run rampant and now, seeing the result, we have hit the panic button.
Posted by judgedredd, 27/05/2010 10:02:16 AM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...