News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Call to remove road, ridge for Bulga coalmine 

Call to remove road, ridge for Bulga coalmine

07 Oct, 2011 03:00 AM
AN Upper Hunter road should be eliminated and a supposedly "protected ridge" should be completely removed to allow a coalmine extension near Bulga village, the planning department has recommended.

Approving the Warkworth Extension project for Coal & Allied also means the loss of 764.7 hectares of woodland, affects 114 Aboriginal sites and significant noise and dust for 16 private residences.

It is also considered likely to have a significant impact on the nationally endangered swift parrot and regent honeyeater.

Overruling protests by residents who have complained about the company reneging on its undertakings, the department's recommendation stands to earn the state government about $170 million a year in royalties for about 11 years.

Coal & Allied (owned by Rio Tinto and Mitsubishi) does not want to move Wallaby Scrub Road for the benefit of residents who use it, because it says that would prevent some coal being mined.

Nor does the company want to stick to its earlier promise in a 2003 deed of agreement not to remove Saddleback Ridge, near Bulga.

It says it made that promise when coal was cheaper than its present estimated $120 a tonne.

Bulga and Milbrodale Progress Association spokesman John Krey said the department's reasons for recommending the total elimination of Wallaby Scrub Road showed the interests of residents were of no "real" consequence.

"The value of the coal exceeds all other matters," Mr Krey said.

Residents' objections to the proposed road closure were backed by Singleton councillors. The company needs to obtain the council's approval to close the road.

Planning and regulation manager Mark Ihlein said the council would consider making a submission to the commission to "reinforce its position".

The approval comes with conditions and an $11 million in community contributions.

Mount Thorley Warkworth general manager operations Cam Halfpenny welcomed the recommendation.

The operation mines 18 million tonnes of coal a year and the company wants to extract another 200 million tonnes over an 11-year extension period.

The approval and recommendation has been passed to the Planning Assessment Commission.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I wonder if there is coal under north or south heads of sydney harbour, what about double bay or macqaurie st.

Or to put it another way, i'd be ever so gratefull if the state government got out of our back yards.

Posted by just a thought, 7/10/2011 8:38:56 AM, on The Herald
Greed and more greed. And what will the state government do with the money? Waste most of it if past efforts are any indication and an area which has existed for millions of years will be destroyed to make a mining company and its execs richer, provide a few short term jobs and to line the pockets of todies. This is the new NSW state government!! Cant see much difference to the last lousy one.
Posted by lauriell, 7/10/2011 8:58:18 AM, on The Herald
I’m absolutely disgusted with the Department of Planning and the current state government.... They blatantly ignore what the people want in favour of dollars. There’s nothing the average person can do, to be heard, we just have to make sure we don’t vote the thieves in again but by then it will be too late. “SHAME ON YOU NSW STATE GOVERNMENT” you dont have my vote.
Posted by manazzie, 7/10/2011 10:31:51 AM, on The Herald
Its very hard to express my rage at this without making a comment too offensive for the herald to be published. Absolutely pathetic, the company is virtually trying to buy people off to do their dirty business. Our state gov, is a toothless tiger. I remember people on this very site telling me I wasted my vote by drawing rude pics on it. It appears to me I was right not to give a stuff - we are in a hopeless situation regardless of who we vote in.
Posted by Wulf, 7/10/2011 2:01:51 PM, on The Herald
Its groundhog day. Give all the assurances regarding environmental protection, respecting communities & minimising impacts on the first DA.

Then slowly chip away at all those previous consent conditions to get what you ultimatelt wanted all the time.

We'll see the same thing if they cut the Newcastle Rail Line.

NO NO NO we don't want the land fro development.

Until, well just a small scale kiosk.

Then, well its just not viable at this size so just a minor extension. Then....get the picture. Just another re-run...

Posted by edteech, 7/10/2011 2:20:58 PM, on The Herald
Just great. I use these roads on a weekly basis. At least my van now won't be sand blasted everytime there's a windy day. Pity that I've now got to make a major detour. Even worse for the locals who have to live 24/7 with such an expansion taking place right on their front doorsteps.

Just as importantly who really benefits from all of this? Is it the locals? No. Is it the average person living in the Hunter? No. Is it the state govt who does little in return for the people living in the Hunter? Yes. Is it the mulitnationals? Yes.

Maybe it's time for a new state of Australia to be formed

Posted by DMA, 7/10/2011 2:36:14 PM, on The Herald
@DMA Amen to that.
Posted by Wulf, 8/10/2011 8:41:40 PM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...