News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Camberwell miner in court over Aboriginal site 

Camberwell miner in court over Aboriginal site

01 Aug, 2011 04:00 AM
A GROUP alleging damage to one of the Hunter Region's most significant Aboriginal sites has launched Land and Environment Court action against Ashton Coal Mine at Camberwell.

The court action follows a separate Land and Environment Court hearing in June during which a senior NSW Office of Environment and Heritage officer conceded there had been mine subsidence in the area that included the significant site.

In a summons lodged with the court last month by Robert Lester, on behalf of the Wonnarua people, Ashton is alleged to be "causing harm" to the Aboriginal site without an Aboriginal Heritage Impact Permit and in breach of the National Parks and Wildlife Act.

The Office of Environment and Heritage confirmed it had launched an investigation.

The summons was lodged the same day Ashton was in court over attempts to obtain an Aboriginal Heritage Impact Permit over part of the Camberwell site. In December last year Ashton received consent for a modification of its 2002 consent to mine in the area.

It applied to the then Department of Environment for the permit in late January, and on April 21 appealed to the Land and Environment Court against a deemed refusal by the department.

The Office of Environment and Heritage asked the court to refuse Ashton's appeal. The department told the court later there was a prospect the parties could reach agreement.

The permit action returns to court on August 9 after a Land and Environment Court judge on July 7 upheld an appeal by the Wonnarua people that there had not been sufficient consultation.

A spokesman for Ashton said the company could not comment. The summons matter is in court on Friday.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Can I ask who actually OWNS the land?
Posted by N/Flyer, 1/08/2011 11:19:26 AM, on The Herald
It appears the mine owns the land. However, the authority to destroy aboriginal heritage can only occur under an AHIP. The real question is to Department of Planning and Office of Environment and Heritage as to the process for assessment of the AHIP, and the issue of modification of development consent. It seems something fell off the rails during the assessment process.
Posted by Feargal, 1/08/2011 5:57:22 PM, on The Herald
It is extremely unfortunate that your reporters cannot research this issue more thoroughly. This land that Ashton are seeking consent to mine has been farmed (this includes ploughing) for years without an issue from the aboriginal community. The man who is challenging Ashton on the mining issue never challenged the farmers as far as I know! WHY NOT?
Posted by SMEEKELL, 2/08/2011 12:24:49 AM, on The Herald
@SMEEKELL - Ploughing rural land for agricultural purposes does not require development consent - mining does, in fact, it is designated development.
Posted by Bob, 2/08/2011 12:52:48 PM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
SUBSIDENCE: Camberwell mine.
SUBSIDENCE: Camberwell mine.

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...