News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Cessnock study fund a trade-off 

Cessnock study fund a trade-off

07 Apr, 2010 04:00 AM
ROAD maintenance and a proposed study to determine the future for vineyard tourism could be in jeopardy if Cessnock City Council decides to divert funding to a consultancy report on the future of the Hunter Economic Zone.

A council report tonight will determine the best way to allocate an estimated $50,000 for the report on the controversial industrial estate, now touted as a "white elephant".

The site is owned by the Hunter Economic Zone, which went into receivership last month.

Cessnock City Council wants independent consultants to report to determine the best use for the site, which was originally touted as an area for larger "blockbuster-style" industries.

A report to tonight's council meeting looks at two potential groups to carry out the study, Hill PDA of Sydney and GHD, an international company with a Newcastle office.

It has been estimated that the consultancy report will cost between $40,000 and $50,000 and the council is struggling with ways to fund the project in the current financial year.

The report to tonight's council meeting said there were two funding alternatives: the Vineyard Visioning project, which is tipped to start this month at a cost of $65,000, or dropping service levels such as roads.

Hill PDA has quoted a cost for the study of $54,450 and GHD $40,443.

The report said that Hill PHD is considered to be more comprehensive and would provide the council with information with which to guide its strategic position on the development of the industrial estate.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
i think i should have been a consultant.... people are falling over themselves to give them money....
Posted by judgedredd, 7/04/2010 9:54:32 AM, on The Herald
The site has been controversial since public comments were invited on the original concept for a blockbuster high tech industrial park. Quite apart from the claims of some opponents then who felt the developer was cashing in an otherwise worthless parcel of land through connections, it is now obvious the site is unsuitable in terms of location and lack of infrastructure and would never have attracted modern super scale businesses. So you have to wonder if it was all a ploy to get a rezoning approval and then downscale the development requirements when large scale industries didn,t eventuate. Don't be surprised then if the consultants recommend a large section of the site be further rezoned for housing. And sadly the public won't have any say at all in the suitability of whatever is proposed. The critics of the original proposal have with time been proven correct.
Posted by clarence, 7/04/2010 2:05:55 PM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...