News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Coal & Allied's Hunter Valley mine operation extended 

Coal & Allied's Hunter Valley mine operation extended

06 May, 2009 04:00 AM
NEW approval conditions for Coal & Allied's Hunter Valley Operations South mine, near Singleton, will extend the operation until 2030, safeguarding about 830 jobs and generating an estimated $30 billion in export earnings.

Coal & Allied, a Rio Tinto subsidiary, has pledged to spend $130 million on mine improvements, creating 100 construction jobs and 50 long-term coalmining jobs.

The approvals allow Hunter Valley Operations South to increase coal output from 12.4 million tonnes a year to 16 million tonnes.

Documents published with the approval decision show the State Government expects Hunter Valley Operations South to contribute about $350 million a year to the NSW economy, as well as taxes and royalties.

The Government said the mine had operated under 35 separate development consents and that consolidating these into a single consent would streamline regulation of the mine and remove potentially contradictory requirements under the present regime.

Some risks including impact on groundwater are described as moderate but the Government says the residual environmental and socio-economic effects can be managed adequately, offset and/or compensated for.

But days after the Federal Government delayed its carbon pollution reduction scheme by a year, environmentalists have criticised the State Government approval as a backward step.

Rising Tide spokeswoman George Woods said yesterday that Rio Tinto seemed determined to keep the Hunter Valley dependent on coalmining and to chain it to an industry that has had its day.

Hunter Valley Operations South sits between two other Coal & Allied mines, Mount Thorley Warkworth and Hunter Valley Operations North.

Even though coal prices have fallen substantially in the worldwide economic slump, they remain much higher than they were before the China boom began in 2005.

Recent prices have been $US70 ($93) a tonne.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Rising Tide spokeswoman George Woods said yesterday that Rio Tinto seemed determined to keep the Hunter Valley dependent on coalmining? We are not stupid Mr. Woods, the entire Asian and European economies depend upon coal for power and steelmaking.
Posted by Haz., 6/05/2009 7:22:46 AM
Does this "Rising Tide CULT" have any concerns other than hearing their own voices? does Newcastle have a means of survival as great as its coal...Wine is great, maybe they've had too much. Tourism? Not enough to put into the area as coal does. Come on Rising tide, give us an answer and support it with the finance and expertise to make it happen rather than always condemn every thing about Newcastle...Maybe Rising tide has had its day.
Posted by Devils Advocate, 6/05/2009 8:42:19 AM
the earth may already be on a cycle of warming, mans co2 emissions over the last 200 years may only be helping this occur but can anyone definitively prove that that it is mans actions alone doing this
Posted by van, 6/05/2009 9:53:30 AM
The last story I read on the Herald website related to prostitution on Islington's streets. Expanding the Hunter Valley coal industry in the name of Chinese export dollars is prostitution on a much bigger and deadlier scale. A bad, bad (not to mention visionless) decision.
Posted by rickeyre, 6/05/2009 10:02:41 AM
Knowing what we do about global CO2 levels - 387 ppm and rising 1-2 ppm annually - it is bizarre to hear Coal & Allied affirm their new expanded contracts out to 2030 and 'safeguarding' 830 jobs. The anticipated $30 billion in export earnings in a 450 ppm atmosphere prompts the question what planet C & A executives inhabit?
Posted by pablo, 6/05/2009 2:02:03 PM
And how much will Newcastle get from the $30 billion in export revenue to support community services like Blackbutt Reserve??.......0
Posted by Brett, 6/05/2009 3:54:32 PM
Aprox 150,000 yrs ago,before coal fired power stations,cars,heavy industry etc,etc,the co2 levels were exactly the same as they are now,this information was obtained by scientists who conducted ice core samples in the artic,everything goes in cycles,as life itself does.
Posted by yep, 6/05/2009 6:36:39 PM
CO2 emissions from coal fueled power stations, what a lot of rot. Any one volcanic erruption will produce more co2 than all the coal fueled power stations on the planet. and volcano's have been blowing their top since time began. Can't see anyone putting a cap on a volcano.
Posted by intouch, 6/05/2009 9:42:53 PM
LIFE: BROUGHT TO YOU BY MINING
Posted by SOWAT, 6/06/2010 9:01:15 PM, on The Herald
I'd be more concerned about the fact that most of the money made from coal in the hunter valley goes overseas than the CO2 emissions it produces... Human emissions of CO2 total less than 8% of the total yearly global CO2 emissions, the rest is natural, scientists are beginning to backflip on the idea that CO2 is even a contributor to global warming, Water Vapour is the biggest green house gas. Plus some of the most interesting evolutionary things happened when the earth was hot and covered in tropical rainforest...
Posted by CO2, 21/09/2011 10:31:34 PM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
 PROFITS: Coal & Allied, a Rio Tinto subsidiary, will spend $130 million on mine improvements.
PROFITS: Coal & Allied, a Rio Tinto subsidiary, will spend $130 million on mine improvements.

Most popular articles


 
Landcom Sanctuary 190512
 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...