News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Coal industry eating up Hunter food bowl 

Coal industry eating up Hunter food bowl

14 Oct, 2011 03:00 AM
PRICELESS agricultural land in the Hunter has been lost over the past three decades at a rate more than triple the state average.

The grim toll is revealed in a Newcastle Herald analysis of Australian Bureau of Statistics data between 1980 and 2010.

The statistics show 1,006,345hectares, or 35 per cent, of land in the Hunter Statistical Division is presently used for agriculture.

Since 1980, 744,755 hectares, or 42.5 per cent, of land used for food production has been lost.

By comparison, 10 per cent of agricultural land was lost in NSW during the same period.

The continuing growth of regional centres like Maitland and Singleton, combined with the coalmining industry’s rapid expansion, have been cited as key factors in the loss of agricultural land. Coal seam gas exploration and mining poses a new threat in coming years.

Farmers, planners and environmental groups have warned of major social, economic and environmental consequences of destroying a key food bowl area.

‘‘There’s no turning back once you have lost it. It’s not something you can turn around and say, this has been a mistake,’’ Tocal Agricultural College principal Cameron Archer said.

‘‘[The loss of land] is a blunt fact of economic development, but it has got strong and difficult implications in terms of our long-term ability to feed ourselves and be self-sufficient.’’

NSW Farmers Association president Fiona Simson said the region risked becoming ecologically sterile if the decline continued.

‘‘Unless we can get some up-front planning and a strategic agricultural plan put in place, not just to facilitate balanced development but to demand it, there could be nothing left in another 30 years,’’ Ms Simson said.

The NSW Minerals Council challenges the impact the industry has had on the loss of agricultural land.

A spokesman said land used by mining and waste industries in the Hunter was estimated at 20,500hectares, 0.6per cent in 2006.

‘‘It would still only be 41,000hectares if this figure had doubled in the past five years,’’ he said.

‘‘The vast majority of mining takes place on lower-value grazing land or land that isn’t arable.

‘‘Notwithstanding the actual mine footprint, offset policies mean that thousands of hectares have been acquired by mines, some of which are still used for agriculture, while other land has been directed to conservation values.’’

Almost 800,000hectares have been proclaimed national parks in the Hunter and 29 state conservation areas and nature reserves have been established since 1979.

The minerals council also pointed to work to rehabilitate mined land.

‘‘On land previously used for agriculture or plantation forestry, the aim could be to rehabilitate the land to its pre-mining level of productivity,’’ the spokesman said.

The state government is developing strategic land use policies for the Hunter and elsewhere in the state in an attempt to strike a balance between mining and other land uses such as agriculture, conservation and urban development.

‘‘As a resource-rich area of the state, the Upper Hunter has been identified as a priority region for the preparation of a Strategic Regional Land Use Plan,’’ a Department of Planning spokesman said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
If we only took what we needed out of the ground, then we would remain sustainable for a very long time - but the greedy people just sell off all our assets overseas and ruin our future.

The "powers" need to live within our means and keep this country usable.

And if the fig tree lovers could only see the big picture . . . well! Fighting for a few trees, when the country is in decline seems quite trivial.

Posted by Kurri 'n Rose, 14/10/2011 3:56:04 AM, on The Herald
I believe the heading on this story shows a lack of balance. It conveys the impression that the lack of land is the SOLE intrusion of the mining industry. Yet, when one reads the beginning of the sixth paragraph, it seems that the mining industry is not the cause of land diminution. "the continuing growth of regional centres, (as with) Miatland and Singleton".... "are key factors in the loss of agricultural land" The influence of mining is balanced by unarable land being mined.
Posted by Robert - Hunter Valley, 14/10/2011 4:54:41 AM, on The Herald
So short-sighted. A select few make a bomb on mining, and in a few decades when they are finished with the Hunter what will we have left? Go out the back of Singleton and have a look at what the mines leave behind. It looks like another planet! There's a reason the Chinese are buying up farming land around the world - in a few years that's where the real money will be. We need a government with the guts to occasionally say "no" to the mining giants, no matter how much they cry and run their TV propaganda ads.
Posted by little fella, 14/10/2011 5:14:06 AM, on The Herald
Sadly some mining & chemical corporations have a long history of refusing to clean up their sites once production has finished. Remember Union Carbide at Homebush Bay & Bhopal India.

Perhaps the optimum solution is the SEventh State so they we can take charge of both the requirements for, & royalties from, mining for the benefit of our local kids.

Posted by Machiavelli, 14/10/2011 5:34:20 AM, on The Herald
The NSW Minerals Council is misleading in its claims. The 20 000 hectares of land is only that consumed directly by open cut pits. There is no mention of land sterilised in mandatory buffers, of OHS prohibtions on access to land, of the weed-infested wastelands currently owned by mining companies.

More irrigated land is left idle due to the snatching of water by coal interests, leaving insufficient entitlements left to conduct irrigation (unless for the highest earning use such as horse studs).

More of the Hunter Valley will be alienated from agriculture, lasting for many centuries.

Posted by Feargal, 14/10/2011 5:35:26 AM, on The Herald
I CANNOT EAT A COAL SANDWICH OR HAVE A ROAST COAL DINNER, LEAVE THIS LAND ALONE......
Posted by Dave!!!, 14/10/2011 5:44:44 AM, on The Herald
I don't believe the multinational companies who are mining our beautiful hunter valley give a rats about what damage they are doing to our region, only how much money they can make. The area is now ugly and scarred for life thanks to them. Our heritage is being taken away and our reputation for producing excellent produce for the tables of Australia and the world is in ruin.
Posted by leolog, 14/10/2011 6:29:36 AM, on The Herald
This situation is an example of short term gain, with the money made from coal, to long term pain for the entire country - unless you've got millions of dollars of course. We need to be able to feed ourselves in the future. With the population of Australia forecast to be around 35 million, by the middle of the century, by ensuring we've got less land for food production means to say we'll be thoroughly depended upon imports, as the last I heard humans can't eat coal, which is far from helpful. In fact we could find ourselves akin to Somalia or somewhere even worse!
Posted by DMA, 14/10/2011 6:33:33 AM, on The Herald
Maybe this accelerated mining is because, according to Lake Macquarie Council, it maybe inundated by rising sea levels by 2100.
Posted by Steve, 14/10/2011 6:55:36 AM, on The Herald
Oh get over trying to stop the mines, and focus on what you'll do when the mines are gone and we have a lot of unemployed and a massive amount of money missing from the economy, the mines could actually help our future if we bothered to realise their potential contribution to the future.
Posted by Techy, 14/10/2011 7:16:29 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
CONCERN: Cameron Archer warns the destruction of farming land comes at a price. –  Picture by Anita Jones
CONCERN: Cameron Archer warns the destruction of farming land comes at a price. – Picture by Anita Jones
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: Should the Hunter’s farm land be quarantined from mining and urban development?

Yes, we need the land for food production
(70.1%)

No, we need the export income, jobs and housing
(5%)

They should be able to co-exist
(24.9%)

Total Votes: 438
Poll Date: 13 October, 2011

Most popular articles


 
Landcom Sanctuary 190512
 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...