News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Coal loading lag penalties 

Coal loading lag penalties

04 Sep, 2010 05:00 AM
Coal companies without formal contracts to have their coal rail-hauled to the port might not be able to have their coal loaded onto ships under a new policy announced yesterday.

Coal-loader operator Port Waratah Coal Services says it has taken the punitive step because not enough coal is getting to the loaders on time.

Traditionally, coal companies have booked trains to get coal to the port to be loaded on a ‘‘best endeavours’’ basis.

But under a Newcastle coal industry expansion plan overseen by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, coal-loading and rail-hauling is supposed to be done under long-term ‘‘take or pay contracts’’.

While the coal-loader contracts are all done, progress has been slower on the rail contracts.

General manager Graham Davidson said PWCS had contracts to load 106million tonnes this year but was unlikely to top 97million tonnes because of ‘‘coal chain reliability issues’’ and bad weather.

From next month, PWCS reserved the right to push ships back in the queue if their coal was not covered by rail-haulage contracts.

Coal companies also had a ‘‘one-off opportunity’’ to give up some of their coal allocations at the loaders, saving them financial penalties for not taking their full ‘‘take or pay’’ allocations.

Industry sources said last night that the new policies had another side.

‘‘By forgiving those companies who couldn’t meet their obligations, PWCS is effectively penalising those that did,’’ one shipper said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
"Bad weather" Mother Nature will have her say Boys!
Posted by Weather girl, 4/09/2010 8:47:31 AM, on The Herald
If the chain was organised efficiently there would be no heaps of coal held in the port. It could go from train to ship directly greatly reducing the dust issues.
Posted by Bigfeller, 4/09/2010 9:07:11 AM, on The Herald
load the ships at sea via a conveyor direct from the mine.
Posted by Spinner, 4/09/2010 9:10:55 AM, on The Herald
So how many years has Newcastle been loading coal and to say that some coal companies do not have formal contracts with the rail to haul coal. What is going on. Also in the last couple of years the tonnage has doubled but the benefits to Newcastle, where are these, only in construction work whilst loaders are being built, nothing long term. The Chinese and the shipping owners are laughing all the way to the bank.
Posted by Bigbox, 4/09/2010 9:32:26 AM, on The Herald
I am having the dust in my house analysed. If there is coal in that dust, who will pay for my house to be cleaned, and who will pay for family's health checks? It's time for Newcastle people to stop laying down the welcome mat for companies that trample over us, it's time to stand up for ourselves and fight back.
Posted by judgedredd, 6/09/2010 11:27:28 AM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
NEW: Coal companies will need a formal contract to ensure a smooth flow to ships.
NEW: Coal companies will need a formal contract to ensure a smooth flow to ships.

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Bounce
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...