News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Coal-belt residents say climate change won't affect them 

Coal-belt residents say climate change won't affect them

18 Aug, 2010 05:00 AM
Upper Hunter residents think climate change is a problem that will not directly affect them, and back the coal industry, according to a new study.

The survey of attitudes in Singleton, Muswellbrook and the Upper Hunter was conducted by the Hunter Valley Research Foundation, and 4per cent of respondents thought no action should be taken on climate change.

But research fellow Evan Steverson said large pockets of the region were in no hurry to do anything before 2030.

“These results suggest that many Upper Hunter region residents see climate change as more of a global or national issue rather than a local one, with indirect rather than direct impacts on them,” he said.

About 55per cent agreed or strongly agreed that climate change would have a direct impact on their lives in the next 20 years.

Answering a separate question, 74per cent believed climate change was a problem that needed to be acted on.

Most residents thought humans were causing significant changes to the Earth’s climate.

The most likely to disagree were men older than 65.

The study found reluctance to abandon fossil fuels.

Most respondents thought the benefits of the coal industry for the Upper Hunter outweighed the damage, and the region was divided on nuclear energy as an alternative.

The study found less support than in previous years for paying more for electricity generated from renewable sources such as the sun or the wind.

But many residents said they had reduced their household water and energy use and cut down on waste.

Upper Hunter residents also said they were likely to participate in community bodies or activities such as Landcare or Clean Up Australia Day.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
No surprise that sensible people reject the witchcraft of the green religion. How is this a story?
Posted by Jack, 18/08/2010 11:05:41 AM, on The Herald
CORRECTION. It should read. The residents of the Upper Hunter Coal TOWNS don't see climate change as their problem. For definition of Upper Hunter Coal Town resident see- "Coal mine operator, employee or Coal Industry contractor who will only stay in these towns until they return to the moonscape in their home state, retire back in their home state or go and live in a clean place away from all Mining Moonscapes" Why not ask the residents who have many generations of family roots in this valley and don't have another place where their family history is written. Of course these temporary residents will say the benefits outweigh the damage to this area just as the Sydney Based State Gov. do. Was the question asked what connection those happy with the current Coal rush destruction have with this valley or how long they intend to live in these dusty towns sitting amongst the Upper Hunter Coal Moonscape. These people are here for a short profitable time not a lifetime or two or three. They can't have any love for this place when they like and approve of what is happening to this once beautiful productive place.
Posted by SPARKS, 18/08/2010 11:16:37 AM, on The Herald
The full report can be downloaded for free from the following link: http://www.hvrf.com.au/regional-r esearch-program/environmental-att itudes
Posted by Evan Steverson, 18/08/2010 1:24:58 PM, on The Herald
Agree with Jack, total witchcraft they said in yesterdays paper that they had records going back millions of years I wonder if they are still here it would be lovely to meet them and see their records. This August has been reported as being the wettest and coolest on record so where does climate change and overheating come in to the equation, I always thought that summer is hot, winter is cool or cold and spring and autumn is usually in between, with good rains supplied to enhance the ground for next seasons crops.
Posted by jimbob, 18/08/2010 2:57:51 PM, on The Herald
go SPARKS!! i appreciate your comments.
Posted by judgedredd, 18/08/2010 3:00:43 PM, on The Herald
SPARKS, can not agree with you, quiet a few local residents work in the mines. My son in law works in the mines, my daughter works for company servicing the mines. They both have family history in the coal fields and in coal mining. Tempory residents, most purchased homes in the district and intend to stay.
Posted by intouch, 18/08/2010 5:22:27 PM, on The Herald
SPARKS, I gather you don't work in the mines. Some menial job re- wirering toasters hu.
Posted by intouch, 18/08/2010 5:28:49 PM, on The Herald
Oooh it was warm yesterday...climate change MUST be a lie....
Posted by Zeke, 18/08/2010 6:38:47 PM, on The Herald
I live and breathe coal mining.
Posted by horse, 18/08/2010 7:12:01 PM, on The Herald
"The most likely to disagree were men older than 65.". What a shock! The same ones that got us into this mess.
Posted by Peter, 18/08/2010 7:56:52 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
FOSSILS: Some residents are siding with the coal companies and dismissing climate change.
FOSSILS: Some residents are siding with the coal companies and dismissing climate change.

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...