News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Coal-loader plan causes concern for roosting site 

Coal-loader plan causes concern for roosting site

24 Mar, 2011 03:00 AM
HUNTER environment groups are concerned about the proposed Terminal 4 coal-loader’s potential impact on the region’s only remaining freshwater wetland.

The multibillion-dollar project will be affected by much environmental legislation that will require it to be assessed by both state and federal governments.

Dozens of flora and fauna species have been recorded in the area, which adjoins the internationally recognised Hunter Estuary National Park.

Of particular concern is Deep Pond, an area of about 26hectares shorebirds and ducks favour as a roosting site.

‘‘Bird populations have been increasing in the area because of the destruction of other parts of the Hunter estuary,’’ Hunter Bird Observers Club member Ann Lindsey said.

‘‘The ambitions of the coal industry appear to be overriding the legislation designed to protect the environment.’’

Another sensitive environmental hurdle is the possibility that another rail line may be built on land partly owned by the Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water.

Much of this land has been earmarked for inclusion into the Hunter Estuary National Park.

Port Waratah Coal Services, the organisation behind the T4 plan, was working to tackle the project’s potential environmental effects, PWCS general manager Graham Davidson said.

‘‘We’ve already engaged with environmental experts, government agencies and local groups to work out possible ways forward, and we’re obligated to step up those consultations,’’ Mr Davidson said.

‘‘We’re pretty confident that some highly effective bird and frog protection and relocation strategies can be implemented once everyone’s views have been taken into account.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Further to the other Herald article - roll on Thorium. A tonne of thorium can produce as much energy as 200 tonnes of uranium, or 3,500,000 tonnes of coal. It is estimated to be about three to four times more abundant than uranium in the Earth's crust. Maybe the days of uranium and coal as a power souce will soon be over. Both are damaging to the environment. Don't you love it when technology comes up with something that really kicks ass.
Posted by Thorium Rules, 24/03/2011 4:51:04 AM, on The Herald
what about the impact on the humans?
Posted by judgedredd, 24/03/2011 5:41:55 AM, on The Herald
All the bird watchers have to do is develop a deep pond on the Hexham Swamp, close off the deep pond and the birds will follow. also, the shortland wetlands (aka hexham swamp) will easliy accommodate them . Problem solved for all .... and the old dears are less at risk of being hit by cars and trucks travelling past the existing pond on their way to earning an honest living!
Posted by Priscilla, 24/03/2011 6:05:18 AM, on The Herald
Another example of Old King Coal not letting anything get it it's way to turn this Valley into a complete moonscape.
Posted by Steve, 24/03/2011 6:38:11 AM, on The Herald
but wait lets hold progress...... I think that the rare "job seeking, cash strapped, novocastrian" may have once walked across that site.

Bring on the D9's

Posted by R Plantagenet, 24/03/2011 7:43:37 AM, on The Herald
And yet just another joke, What good is legislation when it is overidden or circumvented every time the big $$ comes along
Posted by So over it, 24/03/2011 7:58:28 AM, on The Herald
The problems relating to dust, noise etc from the existing coal facility have not yet been solved. It would be wrong to install another terminal to increase the movement of coal and the consequent amenity and health hazards, without first fixing the problems created by the existing terminals.
Posted by robert, 24/03/2011 8:18:38 AM, on The Herald
Build a coal loader on the old BHP site, problem solved for the bird watchers.
Posted by Cardiffresident, 24/03/2011 9:02:08 AM, on The Herald
The reason why PWCS won't build a coal loader on the BHP site is because they don't own the land. And the only reason the BHP site idea came about is because T4 still isn't going to provide enough capacity to get all the coal the government wants to mine out of NSW and into the atmosphere. Cardiffresident should try getting out of Cardiff a bit more I think.
Posted by fnord, 24/03/2011 10:24:50 AM, on The Herald
why do we need another coal loader anyway? sure it will create a few jobs for those lucky enouh to get a start, but at what cost. massive craters from where the coal came from, increased transport dramas and not to mention the huge emmissions from the transport of and burning of once it has reached it's new home. and for what, so someone somewhere makes heaps of cash from an assest that should be everyones anyway. leave the stuff in the ground or make it law that moneies made from the profits of coal go straight into safe, renewable energy creation.
Posted by 3qters, 24/03/2011 11:44:57 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
SENSITIVE: Hunter Bird Observers Club member Ann Lindsey  says bird numbers have been increasing in the Deep Pond area because other favoured roosting sites in the Hunter Estuary have been destroyed.
SENSITIVE: Hunter Bird Observers Club member Ann Lindsey says bird numbers have been increasing in the Deep Pond area because other favoured roosting sites in the Hunter Estuary have been destroyed.

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...