News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Community anger at Gloucester Resources' licence renewal 

Community anger at Gloucester Resources' licence renewal

18 Aug, 2009 05:00 AM
THE State Government had again shown itself blinded by coalmining royalties and contemptuous of the views of regional communities, in its renewal of Gloucester Resources' mining exploration licences, residents said yesterday.

The company's three licences, which together cover about 11,000 hectares, were officially renewed in the NSW Gazette on Friday, despite Gloucester residents campaigning to prevent the renewals.

The renewals were effective as of August 11, through to 2012, the Gazette said.

Gloucester Residents In Partnership president Dianne Montague and Gloucester Mayor Julie Lyford said yesterday the official notice was unsurprising but still bitterly disappointing for residents.

In February, about 1000 residents held a public meeting to protest the renewals.

Ms Montague said a company representative had told community members in early July that the Government had said it would renew the licences.

The company was continuing to buy up properties around the town, putting pressure on residents who did not want to leave but who feared they would be left surrounded by company-owned land that would become part of a mine, she said.

Cr Lyford said the government had ignored the wishes of the council and the community, both of which were at the end of their tether.

"They are simply not listening not to us, or the communities at the Liverpool Plains, Jerrys Plains, nobody," she said.

Cr Lyford said the council had tried to have mining restricted from environmentally and agriculturally significant land as part of a review of its Local Environment Plan. But the Planning Department had knocked back the changes.

Cr Lyford said she had discussed her concerns about Gloucester Resources with NSW Premier Nathan Rees at a community meeting in Maitland last Thursday.

"He said 'I hear what you are saying and I will make inquiries'," she said. The licence renewals were formalised in the Gazette issued the next day.

A spokesman for Mineral Resources Minister Ian Macdonald emphasised that an exploration licence was not an approval to mine, but merely for exploration activity.

He said Mr Macdonald had met with Gloucester Resources and discussed the community's concerns. He had also met with Gloucester Residents in Partnership and the chair of the Community Consultative Committee, Terry Healey.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Labor Minister Macdonald has told residents in Gloucester that the mining here would be underground. The exploration company is unable to confirm this as factual - so is it to be open cut adjacent the town, with all of the negative health consequences for our children? Studies have shown that at 1.6km, the risk of children living near open cut coal getting asthma is 30%, at 3.2km it is 21%, at 4.8km it is 13%. Will this Labor State Government allow our children to become ill in exchange for these royalties?
Posted by noTomorrow, 18/08/2009 8:26:53 AM, on The Herald
Residents believe there will be a mine because all mines are approved by the Govt. For three more years now they will live in fear that if they don't sell their farm then they will be surrounded by the mine. Mr Brian Wingett, head of GRL said to a resident that he would own the valley one day. And the Govt. are giving him the licence to do just that.
Posted by gloucester RIP, 18/08/2009 8:54:28 AM, on The Herald
Everyone in Australia should be complaining about this boofhead logic.
Posted by Comrade, 18/08/2009 3:16:56 PM, on The Herald
Comrades amended comment Hon. Ian MacDonald MLC Minister for Primary Industries Minister for Energy Minister for Mineral Resources Minister for State Development. Do we feel comfortable Gloucester???
Posted by Comrade, 18/08/2009 4:41:34 PM, on The Herald
The Managing Director of Gloucester Resources Ltd (GRL), Mr Brian Wingett, announced to his Community Consultative Committee on 3 July that his EL's had been renewed. On 6 Aug, Coal & Petroleum Titles, Min Res Division, DPI, stated GRL's exploration licences had not been renewed - the applications were still being processed. Also on 6 Aug, the Titles Administrator, Dept Industries & Investment (DPI) said GRL's renewals were still under consideration. The Govt Gazette announced the renewals, effective 11 Aug, on Aug 14. So how did GRL know of the renewals on 3 July when DPI, 6 Aug, said the renewals were still under consideration? If they were not gazetted until 14 Aug, then on 3 July Mr Wingett couldn't have known, could he? Is this the open & responsible government we deserve or just the Rees variety? Will the O'Farrell version be any different? I think I'll ask him.
Posted by normandy, 19/08/2009 11:23:35 AM, on The Herald
The govt is doing this for the royalties and its belief in non renewable COAL. It has NO INTEREST in Gloucester residents. Unlike the Hunter, Gloucesters coal is an isolated seam with a very finite economic life. Gloucester will see up to 30 years of destruction, workers then left unemployed, inoperable farms due to soil and water loss, and asthmatic children. GRL will sell out just as soon as it has a buyer with enough clout and cash to force itself onto Gloucester. GRL won't be looking for an environmentally or socially responsible company either. (AND neither will REES if he still has a job)
Posted by soldout, 19/08/2009 2:54:52 PM, on The Herald
Surely you didn't expect anything less from this government, they just take & take, till there is nothing left. Its a crying shame about the Liverpool Plains' that area should be saved & preserved.. but what can we do ?? we are only mere taxpayers
Posted by going ..going .gone, 19/08/2009 9:05:49 PM, on The Herald
I must admit that, from an economic sense there is no way a few unproductive farms will take precedence over a multi-billion dollar coal industry.

it makes sense to mine, then rehabilitate, then farm again on the temporal scale of things, the money from the resources (which will provide jobs for hundreds of Australians, many locals) is better for the community than a farm. unfortunately the honest truth.

as for the "studies have shown that coal mines increase the risks of asthma" person, I agree, but that paper was from another time whereas the mining industry now has to wet down its roads to reduce dust massively stopping all but the tiniest risk.

as for the coal seam having a short life, that is true, but in 30 years it will bring more infrastructure than 500 years of farming, and decentralisation of the Australian population is an important goal for the spatial dynamics of the Australian population.... my view on it anyway, think of the better schools and hospitals in the area which will result from an increased population.

Posted by Matt, 27/01/2011 5:55:43 PM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...