News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Concerns rejection leaves a bad taste 

Concerns rejection leaves a bad taste

10 Oct, 2011 03:00 AM
KEY residents' objections to an expansion of Coal & Allied's operations at Bulga have been rejected by NSW planning officials, leaving a Hunter community feeling let down and ignored.

A Department of Planning assessment, which this week recommended the project be approved, said there was no technical merit to resident claims Saddleback Ridge, between the Mount Thorley Warkworth mine and the village, protected them from the effects of mining.

The company plans to remove the ridge, leaving the village exposed to views of overburden areas and within about 2.6 kilometres of the open-cut operation.

The assessment said modelling showed adverse weather conditions neutralised "any mitigation" provided by the ridge although it was described as a "key" feature.

The planned expansion will have a "high" visual impact on the villages of Bulga and Milbrodale and the nearest residence will be about 1.5 kilometres from the mine disturbance area.

Bulga Milbrodale Progress Association spokesman John Krey said the assessment conflicted with a 2002 environmental impact study, which said the ridge was a visual and acoustic buffer.

"So important, a ministerial deed was executed to ensure the ridge was not removed," he said.

This week's assessment revealed this 2003 agreement between the government and the company was "flawed" because the ridge area contained substantial coal resources.

This "conflict was acknowledged but not resolved in both the 2003 development consent and the associated deed of agreement," the department assessment said.

Mr Krey said this was the first reference to any conflict related to the agreed conservation of the ridge.

"We find nothing in our detailed submission has been taken into consideration, " he said.

The only matter not resolved was the rezoning of the ridge for conservation, Mr Krey said.

The department says the company will have to acquire private properties and recommended tree planting and rehabilitation of overburden to reduce the extension's visual effects.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Permanent destruction of the area is being recommended yet it will be "offset" with land at Merriwa?

Are we all that stupid? I believe we got rid of the last government because of this sort of greed. Time for the new lot to show a bit of the promised backbone.

Posted by onlooker, 10/10/2011 6:36:49 AM, on The Herald
dollars talk residents walk!
Posted by Bigfeller, 10/10/2011 8:24:07 AM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
ANGRY: John Krey on his property showing Saddleback Ridge. - Picture by Peter Stoop
ANGRY: John Krey on his property showing Saddleback Ridge. - Picture by Peter Stoop

Most popular articles


 
Landcom Sanctuary 190512
 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...