News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Council's fig-saving vote unlawful but independent assessment to proceed 

Council's fig-saving vote unlawful but independent assessment to proceed

21 Sep, 2011 09:59 AM
NEWCASTLE councillor Bob Cook says he will offer activists a deal today that includes the removal of the Laman Street fig trees, after legal advice indicated he would probably win a court challenge to last week’s fig-saving vote.

The council voted unanimously last night to make public a legal opinion from a Senior Counsel that says last week’s vote for an independent assessment was unlawful.

Cr Cook said after the meeting that he had obtained personal legal advice and would challenge the controversial decision in court ‘‘as a last resort’’ if necessary.

A council reference group is due to meet Save Our Figs today to discuss the next step in the independent assessment.

Cr Cook said he would attend and ask for a compromise by proposing a legal motion that would allow the assessment to proceed.

Doing so would then require the council to remove the trees ‘‘as soon as practical’’ in line with the council’s earlier resolution.

‘‘Independent assessment and the existence of the trees are not necessarily mutually dependent,’’ Cr Cook said.

That course of action would require Save Our Figs to effectively consent to the removal of the trees.

‘‘I’m an optimist,’’ he said.

Cr Cook said failing a negotiated agreement at today’s meeting, he would consider ‘‘other avenues’’.

They would probably include a rescission motion, which if lodged could halt the independent assessment process until voted on.

Cr Cook said he was confident an independent assessment would validate the council’s existing risk studies.

‘‘There’s been some suggestion that I’m afraid of independent assessment,’’ he said.

‘‘I’m very enthusiastic about independent assessment. The point is it needs to be done in a legal way.’’

Lord mayor John Tate was forced last night to defend his actions in allowing debate on the independent assessment motion, claiming he had not at that time seen a legal opinion that suggested the motion would not be acceptable.

‘‘That was not seen by me until yesterday evening,’’ Cr Tate said.

He said a memo from council general manager Phil Pearce had recommended proceeding with the meeting.

The legal advice says Cr Tate, as chairperson of the meeting ‘‘was obliged ... to rule the motion out of order’’.

‘‘With great respect to the lord mayor, I consider that his approach was erroneous in law,’’ the Senior Counsel said.

The council expects the Newcastle Art Gallery and Newcastle Region Library to open today, after both were evacuated yesterday due to high wind.

Hear about what happened when the area around the figs was closed yesterday

A ‘‘total exclusion zone’’ was put around the fig trees about 1pm, when wind more than 50km/h was measured.

It was the first time the extreme risk mitigation measures had been enforced. Patrons and pedestrians expressed their frustration in Laman Street after having been evacuated or denied entry.

Insurer Statewide Mutual insisted on the measures.

At the same time yesterday, staff members detected smoke in the art gallery and Fire and Rescue NSW crews arrived in the street to investigate.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Since when do our politicians, Federal, Sate or Local need a silks opinion before debating ANY issue? We elect our politicians and it is the democratic process that they debate what ever they wish to. What a load of b****t, having a lawyer tell our councillors they are out of line having a debate in the Chambers. Now it's truly ridiculous!
Posted by oh come on, 21/09/2011 4:28:22 AM, on The Herald
So is clr bob. Cook now the self appointed newcastle lord mayor and council all rolled into one.roofs fly and wind causes havoc but the figs still stand.give it up bob


Posted by mak, 21/09/2011 5:10:38 AM, on The Herald
Did any branches from the trees fall down yesterday in the significant wind event?

Why isn't the council trying to remove other figs in the area if they are so unsafe?

This is complete bs so council can proceed with its plans for a shadeless closed off laman st

Posted by stumeister, 21/09/2011 5:12:03 AM, on The Herald
This article quotes Councillor Cook as saying ‘‘I’m very enthusiastic about independent assessment. The point is it needs to be done in a legal way.’’

During mediation last month , Councillor Cook publicly agreed to third party determination but then turned around and voted against it.

Cr Cook could now be true to his word and make this all "legal" by using his vote to ensure independent assessment happens.

Stop the conflict!

Submitted via iPhone App

Posted by Madness of Crowds, 21/09/2011 5:28:26 AM
Is this a Monty Python skit?

How can Frank keep a straight face following this script? Hoo Ha indeed.

Posted by Disillusioned with Newcastle, 21/09/2011 5:34:46 AM, on The Herald
It seems to me that as soon as possible pessimistic optimists need to be removed from Council.
Posted by Bigfeller, 21/09/2011 5:37:28 AM, on The Herald
The restored Post Office would be an ideal location for the new Art Gallery. It is of similar architecture to the NSW Art Gallery and such a relocation would do wonders for that part of Hunter Street. And being in the prime of a typical lifespan of their species, the historic Laman Street figs could live happily for considerable time to come.
Posted by Soothe the savage beast, 21/09/2011 6:29:36 AM, on The Herald
Did a fig fall down in yesterday's wind?
Posted by Mayfield Molly, 21/09/2011 6:55:39 AM, on The Herald
did the wind blow over any figs? did the council make a decision? will the SOF people agree to cutting the figs down? is Cr Cook really an optimist? is they guy in the exclusion zone in the video wearing his safety helmet? did he think a fig was going to fall on his head? is this whole sorry mess going to go away in a hurry? sad, sad, sad......
Posted by judgedredd, 21/09/2011 7:19:52 AM, on The Herald
Overkill for effect???? 50kph breeze can shut down the city centre??? Lets get rid of the councilors and just have the insurance company run the city (in to the ground!)
Posted by diggers1, 21/09/2011 7:27:24 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
EMERGENCY: Newcastle City Council staff brave high wind to close the art gallery yesterday. –  Picture by Peter Stoop
EMERGENCY: Newcastle City Council staff brave high wind to close the art gallery yesterday. – Picture by Peter Stoop
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
20 September, 2011
14 September, 2011
16 September, 2011
19 September, 2011
POLL
Q: Should Newcastle City Council be sacked?

Yes
(84.5%)

No
(15.5%)

Total Votes: 588
Poll Date: 14 September, 2011
BLOGS
20 September, 2011

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...