News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Danger signs at Broke drilling 

Danger signs at Broke drilling

07 Sep, 2008 10:49 PM
BROKE residents have been alarmed by signs saying "Danger of Explosive Vapours" erected beside two coal seam methane gas test wells on the edge of the Upper Hunter village.

Hunter-Bulga Gas Action Group spokesman Graeme Gibson said the potentially explosive zone was 300 metres from Broke Primary School, tennis courts and a recreation area and 200 metres from the closest home.

"Representatives of the company using the wells haven't spoken to residents about the extent of the explosive risk and some residents believe any risk is too great to justify the wells," Mr Gibson said.

Sydney Gas general manager Mark Harper dismissed the concern as an overreaction.

"The risk of explosion is absolutely negligible and the signs are simply a legal requirement to identify the nature of the installation," Mr Harper said.

"There are no leaks at the wells, the gas will be under little more pressure than a car tyre and the explosive danger would be less than the local petrol station.

"Methane is also passed from the back passages of animals and humans and although I haven't tested it, I'd say there is more methane gas coming from cows in the next paddock, or even leaking from the children in the school playground, than coming from our wells."

Mr Gibson said residents were concerned about the potential for gas to leak from ground fractures associated with the wells and the visual impact of drilling on property values and wine-related tourism.

Mr Harper said his company had just bought another property in Putty Road, Millbrodale, on which three test wells would be drilled as part of a program that would consist of nine test wells in the Broke-Bulga area.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Can you believe the arrogance of Sydney Gas to say that the school children and the cattle are more danger to the village of Broke than a gas well drilled on a flood plain, through water tables, bringing methane gas to the surface. To say that the danger signs are merely a legal requirement shows that Sydney Gas has no respect for the environment or the people.
Posted by BLAME, 8/09/2008 10:45:43 AM
How can this man and his team not listen to the people that actually live in the area? The Coal Seam Methane process is extremely dangerous and needs to be done in vast tracts of land as is being done in Queensland, certainly not within 250 metres of a village or along a narrow and reasonably populated valley. The complaints about the explosive, invisible, odourless and poisonous gas are not to do with the well-head, but are based on real evidence of unpredictable gas migration once the ground water is removed and the coal seam fractured releasing the gas. A petrol station is not the same. The petrol is in a tank underground - being stored, not mined. The tiny number of underground petrol (station) tank incidents compared to the overwhelming evidence of gas migration with the processes you are using is stark and real. Sydney Gas's invading small communities who have no choice in the matter will endanger lives and businesses in the celebrated Broke-Fordwich Wine Region.
Posted by Peter Firminger, 8/09/2008 12:00:35 PM
AJ Lucas are a major SGL shareholder and they own the drilling companies that SGL use. The comment was highly relevant to your story.
Posted by Peter Firminger, 8/09/2008 12:44:49 PM
Some comments on this story have been edited. Please revisit the relevant aspects of the policy, below.

". . .entries deemed libellous, offensive, unacceptable, deceptive, flagrantly abusive or misleading . . .will be removed".


Posted by Moderator on 8/09/2008 12:55:39 PM
Mark Harper's attitude towards the residents of Broke is summed up by the subject matter of his references to the school children. How disgraceful and how disrespectful. The company of which he is a CEO is carrying out these drilling activities within a few hundred metres of the Broke Public School and will soon be doing the same within a few hundred metres of the Milbrodale Public School. Mr Harper, if you have children, would you send them to school in Broke or Milbrodale given the fact that your company refuses to guarantee that there will be no mishaps caused by your drilling and associated activities?
Posted by Incensed Teacher, 8/09/2008 6:19:55 PM
Sydney Gas is trivialising a serious matter. We have heard all the "methane in elephant farts" jokes already in the days when global warming was not taken seriously and "the jury was still out". Now we know better and can only hope that it is still not too late. Sydney Gas pretends there is nothing to worry about, they are doing just a spot of exploration here and there, nothing too serious. In fact, what we are facing here is a new huge fossil fuel industry being created. Do we really want to extract all this extra carbon from the ground and burn it? If so, under what conditions? We need wide and comprehensive public discussion, we need research and open planning. Petroleum exploration leases, which are used for coal bed methane exploration, cover most of the Hunter Valley. If we are not careful we will all live either next to a coal mine or in a gas field. Do we want that? Our group has been fighting against this inappropriate fossil energy development for over two years. We do not oppose coal bed methane mining as such if done in a responsible manner. You can read all the background information on our website: http://www.huntergasactiongroup.com.au/ A brief outline of our main concerns is provided by our friends from Wollombi here: http://wage.org.au/news/faultline.cfm George Tlaskal
Posted by HBGAG, 9/09/2008 6:34:53 AM
Why are the people in the Broke - Wollombi against gas extraction? The truth is that the communities up and down this quiet tourist centre are a mix of farmers, miners, professionals, and tourism operators. The large committees and members on the two action groups represent several CEOs of international businesses, 4 solicitors, 3 local councillors, school teachers, miners, restaurant owners, tourist operators, geologists, a national property developer – all with over two years of intense and detailed study of the issue paid for in hard cash of more than $40,000 (donated by the local community) in legal and expert advice – not to mention donated time by professionals and experts of over 1000 hours. So let’s get it straight – it does not make sense to bring a heavy industry into a high-density rural environment. The environment, health and lifestyle will suffer in the confines of a small community.
Posted by HSTAY, 11/09/2008 7:45:57 AM
Sydney Gas have the option to mine away from villages, as the community overwhelmingly wants them to do, but refuse to do so. The state govt is ultimately responsible and should amend the laws immediately. Would the people who make these laws and the mining companies who take advantage of them like this kind of potentially dangerous situation on their doorstep? No.
Posted by karyne gough, 11/09/2008 11:19:30 AM
If Sydney gas actually cared (as they claim they do) why would they bother with such a contentious site for a gas well? The answer suggested by the article is "arrogance". They don't provide any answers but continue to demonstrate their arrogance by trivialising the matter.
Posted by Robin Saker, 11/09/2008 9:28:12 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...