News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Debt could end GPT's city plan 

Debt could end GPT's city plan

22 Oct, 2008 09:42 PM
THE GPT Group's ambitious redevelopment plan for inner Newcastle is under a cloud after news of the company's debt problems hit the Australian stockmarket.

GPT is the oldest listed property trust in Australia but its share price has fallen steeply in recent months as it struggles with more than $5 billion in debt.

When yesterday's Australian Financial Review ran a front-page report saying that GPT was being forced to raise $1 billion from shareholders in a heavily discounted "rights issue", the company contacted the Australian stock exchange, which agreed to suspend its shares from trading until tomorrow morning.

GPT declined to comment further, saying it would issue a statement tomorrow, but a public relations firm hired by GPT said the Financial Review story was "essentially correct".

"The steep discount to the raising, lead managed by investment bank UBS, would be unprecedented in recent times and indicates the parlous state of the [GPT] trust's finances and the lack of confidence in the listed real estate investment trust sector as property values fall," the Australian Financial Review reported.

Newcastle Lord Mayor John Tate said GPT was obviously hitting hard financial times but he had been assured by the company that it was determined to build its Newcastle project and he was not too concerned about the stock exchange development.

"I'm not too concerned about it a rights issue is just one of the methods that companies use to raise money and none of it changes the fact that GPT's proposal is an opportunity that we cannot afford to miss," Cr Tate said.

The Newcastle project is valued at about $650 million and GPT is believed to have spent at least $80 million buying property on the Hunter Street Mall.

In 2005, GPT rejected a $3.71 bid for its shares from rival shopping centre owner Stockland. Since then GPT's shares have fallen to $1.15 yesterday.

Two other property groups, Stockland and CFS Retail Property Trust, recently held rights issues, but the difference with these was that Stockland was discounted by just 7 per cent, and CFS by 17 per cent.

GPT, in contrast, is reportedly pricing the rights issue at a discount of up to 50 per cent.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I looked at GPT`s plan for Newcastle. You can find it at: http://newcbd.gpt.com.au/default.asp Click on window "Unlocking Newcastle" Click on "Decay to Destination" Workbook (Civitas) It was interesting. It shows lots of buildings and lots of people, but no parking. Wasn`t parking one of the problems that contributed to the demise of the cbd in the first place ? I was surprised to see 3 Ferry wharves,...maybe there to take you to Stockton as its probably the only place to park your car. I was always keen on the light rail idea, but this wouldn`t fit with the current plan at all. They say,"the more you look, the more you see". The plan showed buildings on the current rail corridor in front of Market St. Building on the rail corridor ? Aren`t you creating a barrier ? I`m not against the development of the cbd, but I do believe Newcastle should act with due diligence in this matter. Be careful what you wish for John Tate, after you get it, you might not like it.
Posted by Colin O., 22/10/2008 11:04:37 PM
Why should we continue with a shopping mall and rip out a train line if tough times are ahead? Sometimes doing nothing is an option. Surely in these times of uncertainty, a half-finished redevelopment that runs out of money is a likely outcome for our mall, let's wait and see if GPT are fair dinkum and that they have the cash to finish what they start.
Posted by Shintaro, 23/10/2008 5:30:47 AM
Oh, I see - and it was all about the rail line? haha!!
Posted by unclebarry, 23/10/2008 5:47:54 AM
Can I ask three reasonable questions. Firstly Of the properties GPT have "purchased" who many have beed fully paid for and how many are "options to purchase"? Secondly Has Stockland been a purchaser of GPT shares in recent times because they have been able to increase their holding at less than $3.71 a share infact for as low as about $1? Thirdly will GPT be able to finish the Charlestown project?
Posted by Bigfeller, 23/10/2008 9:47:51 AM
So we go ahead and rip out the rail line to help a developer who then goes bust and takes the pipe dreams with them. Get real Mr Tate etc, you are all being taken for a ride. Why not catch the train instead, it's a lot cheaper.
Posted by roger, 23/10/2008 11:57:14 AM
Perhaps it was a `typo` "Rail Line a barrier to CBD", when it should have read, "Rail Line a barrier to GPT". Some of the GPT`s plan I liked very much. I`m keen to see a redevelopment of the CBD, but on mutually agreeable terms, and not a take it or leave it approach. Should the development not proceed, the Council and State government could still do a lot more to revitalise the CBD. One suggestion: End the heavy rail line in the middle of Hunter St (Civic), reopen the Mall, extend Darby, Wolfe, Newcomen streets etc down to the harbourside. The thousands of pavers in the Mall could be recycled and used for landscaping the harbour front plaza in front of Market Street. Run the buses (nice buses) down through the ex-Mall. The 2 rail pedestrian bridges at the East End could be relocated/reused at Steel St and Worth Place to provide badly needed access to the Honeysuckle/Harbourside. This would be a cheaper/low cost alternative in the current economic climate. The net gain would be greater than the net loss of a couple of hundred metres of heavy rail track. No doubt, many will disagree.
Posted by Colin O., 23/10/2008 12:26:47 PM
Good on them for seeking a pro-active solution in tricky economic times. I don't blame them for looking to a solution to improve the city as well as protect their investment here. So easy to knock isn't it boys.
Posted by dave, 23/10/2008 1:17:22 PM
It appears that those wanting the rail line to stay are quite happy for the developer to go bust, and Newcastle to miss out on extensive projects. I'm at a loss, Newcastle needs the jobs in construction and retail, some of the youth that are complained about regularly may find work during and after this project.
Posted by Buell, 23/10/2008 1:18:09 PM
Get a bus Roger! It's cheaper, greener and uses less taxpayer subsidies than trains. Buses also mean less hangers-on than trains. take a look on Google earth at the number of cars parked in the employee car park at Newcastle station ..... What do all these people do in there??????
Posted by priscilla, 23/10/2008 2:07:30 PM
PRISCILLA You've made my day. Thank you. Newcastle will never progress until we get political representation that doesn't rely on the union for endorsement and election.
Posted by George J, 23/10/2008 4:08:23 PM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
 IN DOUBT: Part of the GPT plan for Newcastle's inner-city.
IN DOUBT: Part of the GPT plan for Newcastle's inner-city.

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...