News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Demand for coal royalties to return 

Demand for coal royalties to return

01 Dec, 2010 03:00 AM
Nearly three-quarters of the lucrative coalmining royalties the state government collects come from the Hunter, the NSW Auditor General has reported.

The report showed the Hunter contributed $897 million, or 73 per cent, of the state total of $1.233billion paid to the government in 2008-09. If Gloucester’s $21million is counted, the region contributed 75 per cent of the coal tally.

The report, released yesterday, said the government had missed out on about $8million over the past five years because the Department of Industry and Investment did not have a robust process to identify what mining companies owed and to make sure it was paid.

The findings have prompted calls for an overhaul of arrangements for collecting royalties and for a fairer share of the Hunter coal industry’s multimillion-dollar annual contribution to the state budget to be invested back into the region.

Muswellbrook mayor Martin Rush said the report confirmed the Hunter was the ‘‘engine room of the state’’ but that none of the benefits were being returned directly to the region, as affected councils carried the burden of providing local infrastructure to support the booming industry.

Opposition industry and energy spokesman Duncan Gay said he understood the frustration of regions such as the Hunter which wanted a ‘‘fairer share’’.

Asked if a Coalition government would adopt a policy of a percentage of royalties being returned to the Hunter, Mr Gay said the details were being discussed but that the Coalition recognised that mining-affected regions needed ‘‘special help’’.

A NSW Minerals Council spokesman said it had been discussing a potential royalties-for-mining-regions scheme with ‘‘both sides of government’’, focusing on its support for infrastructure investment in regional NSW.

Industry Minister Steve Whan said the audit recommendations would be implemented, including a review of the merits of transferring the collection of royalties to the Office of State Revenue.

‘‘I am advised that if the [$8 million] figure is correct, it would equate to 0.27 per cent of the nearly $3.5 billion collected by the department [in five years],’’ Mr Whan said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
As if any elected Government would return any more royalty monies than what they are currently doing! It would mean a reduction in their Superannuation, their Gold Cards etc...

We as a Region deserve better. and the sooner Sharon Grierson and Jodi McKAY start doing the job they were elected for the better!

Look at all the opportunites Newcastle missed out on when Ms. McKAY and her Labor constituents with the GPT disgrace!

We are a truly great city and need to be treated as such, but while ever that massive drain on the economy (Sydney) exists I do not forsee life in Newcastle will be any different!

I do not look forward to life in this City once that black stuff stops coming out of the ground in such abundance!

Keep fighting the fight for all the communities Mr. Rush

Posted by Stix, 1/12/2010 3:44:29 AM, on The Herald
I would challenge anyone to prove to me the State Governement has spent $897 in the Hunter Valley in the past year let alone $897 million.
Posted by Ron Burgundy, 1/12/2010 7:18:56 AM, on The Herald
@ stix..... sharon grierson did nothing in her previous term yet we were dumb (as a region) enough to re-elect her. dont expect her to do anything different. we get what we deserve from her.

@ Ron.... they bought the PO and some other run down building.

Posted by judgedredd, 1/12/2010 7:56:27 AM, on The Herald
yet more proof we should leave NSW and form our own state - let Western Sydney pay for it's own infrastructure, we'll pay for ours
Posted by snodgrass, 1/12/2010 8:03:10 AM, on The Herald
What happens when the mining royalties dry up? Resources won't last forever and commodity prices won't always be so favourable. We will be left with a landscape scarred and damaged beyond repair, an unemployed workforce and an impoverished region with no infrastructure to show for it's great contribution to the wealth of the state and the nation. We are now past the point of simply demanding a "fairer share". We must now be demanding our own state so that all royalties from mining in this region are spent at home. Sydney has gorged itself for too long on the wealth of this region. It is time to revisit the question of a new state for Northern NSW.
Posted by Newy, 1/12/2010 8:18:43 AM, on The Herald
I would just like a twice yearly payment to clean the outside of my houseof coal dust
Posted by leahkf, 1/12/2010 8:29:41 AM, on The Herald
The coal royalties would go to the Hunter Valley in any case, not Newcastle. With the new coal loaders going up on Kooragang Island, How much coal actually enters Newcastle anyway?

It's time to wake up Newcastle residents, your home is a wasteland.

Posted by neilabraham, 1/12/2010 8:57:23 AM, on The Herald
@ snodgrass - thumbs up!
Posted by shorty, 1/12/2010 10:01:07 AM, on The Herald
time to secede, glory to the people's republic of novocastria!
Posted by action directe, 1/12/2010 10:15:45 AM, on The Herald
snodgrass I agree with you. We would have the head office of the mines department to collect mining royalties and the fines collection mob! But on the downside we would have Hunter Water!
Posted by Harold, 1/12/2010 10:50:00 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...