News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Eli's timing perfect as his parents count blessings 

Eli's timing perfect as his parents count blessings

15 Jan, 2010 04:00 AM
STEPHANIE and Ben Hope, of New Lambton, are fortunate their second baby arrived on Monday.

Eli's birth, at Newcastle Private Hospital, came before changes to the Federal Government's Extended Medicare Safety Net increased the cost of out-of-hospital care for private patients.

Previously a patient would be reimbursed 80 per cent of out-of-pocket expenses for out-of-hospital care after reaching the safety net threshold (of $562.90 for concession cardholders and people receiving Family Tax Benefits, and $1126 for all others).

But the Government has placed a cap on most obstetric services including antenatal visits and scans.

The National Association of Specialist Obstetricians and Gynaecologists estimates that, on average, pregnant women expecting to deliver their babies after May 20 will be almost $1000 worse off.

The association's president, Dr Hilary Joyce, said many families would not be able to afford the additional out-of-pocket costs.

"Many families do not realise what has happened to the cost of obstetric care since January 1 and so may not be financially prepared for it," Dr Joyce said.

Having to find another $1000 to pay bills associated with the birth would make a big difference to the Hopes. .

It might mean the difference between choosing the public or the private system, despite the fact they have private health insurance.

It might also affect how long they could afford for Mrs Hope to stay home with the new baby, when her paid maternity leave runs out in three months.

The changes would force some mothers-to-be into the already overwhelmed public hospital system, Dr Joyce said.

"We are looking forward to working with [Federal Health] Minister Nicola Roxon to find a better way to save money for taxpayers without hurting Australian women creating families," Dr Joyce said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Beauracrats always attack the ones who can least afford it, they are scumbags aren't they. Less holidays and less perks for politicians might help too.
Posted by Jimbob, 15/01/2010 10:20:11 AM, on The Herald
You would be surprised how many things have changed and how many people know of it. Centrelink,for Eg.
Posted by Concerned Resident, 15/01/2010 10:40:55 AM, on The Herald
I am expecting baby number 2 this year. In September of 2008 I delivered our first baby by emergancy cesarean at the John Hunter Hospital. My antenatal care cost me NOTHING, my delivery cost me NOTHING & my post natal care cost me NOTHING. If you CHOOSE to go the private option then you should expect to pay. I don't think the tax paying public should in any way shape or form be subsidising the PRIVATE system!
Posted by SB, 15/01/2010 11:26:28 AM, on The Herald
I also went public for the birth of my 4 children, despite having private health insurance. My main reason was private obstetricians all wanted to intervene - if the baby hadn't arrived by the due date, they wanted to induce etc. My last pregnancy was twins, born naturally at JHH. All the private obs I spoke to insisted I would have to have a Caesar. If people choose to go private, they should expect to incur the additional costs. Maybe if the private hospitals didn't intervene so much in labour, their running costs wouldn't be so high....surgery costs a lot more than a midwife's salary!
Posted by mamasaid, 15/01/2010 1:45:29 PM, on The Herald
SB, if anything the private system is currently subsidising the public system. What would happen if those people currently receiving private maternity care switched over to the public system? The resources of the public health are stretched enough as it is.
Posted by Reg, 15/01/2010 1:56:00 PM, on The Herald
Completely agree, if you CHOOSE to go private, you should have to pay for it.
Posted by Julie, 15/01/2010 2:47:06 PM, on The Herald
is this the same jimbob who spouts religious quotes? how very christian of you.
Posted by davey, 15/01/2010 3:24:57 PM, on The Herald
Why are these people using a private hospital to have a baby anyway?
Posted by Clare, 15/01/2010 3:36:33 PM, on The Herald
SB how about you look at the big picture? If the tax paying public DIDN'T subsidise the private system, would the resources have been available for you to get your emergency cesarean? The health system is already quite overloaded. By subsidising the private health system it frees up the public system for people who may not be able to afford any other option.
Posted by Look at the big picture, 15/01/2010 4:30:55 PM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
BEAUTIFUL BABY: Stephanie Hope and her new son Eli at Newcastle Private Hospital yesterday.- Picture by Ryan Osland
BEAUTIFUL BABY: Stephanie Hope and her new son Eli at Newcastle Private Hospital yesterday.- Picture by Ryan Osland
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: Is the Government right to limit payments for scans and antenatal visits for pregnant women?

Yes - it prevents over-charging by doctors
(34%)

No - women should get whatever services they need
(66%)

Total Votes: 156
Poll Date: 14 January, 2010

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...