News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Emission scheme casts shadow on jobs 

Emission scheme casts shadow on jobs

01 Dec, 2008 04:00 AM
UP to 36,000 Hunter jobs and billions of dollars in revenue would be put at risk from an emissions trading scheme, research has found.

The findings are contained in Hunter Business Chamber-commissioned research into the likely effects of emissions trading on carbon-producing large industries and small to medium enterprises.

The 26 industry groups the Hunter Valley Research Foundation data indicated would be most affected included aluminium, electricity supply, cattle, iron and steel, black coal and transport.

The industry groups directly employ between 30,000 and 36,000 workers in the region and indirectly 50,000 employees.

"None of the companies surveyed believe they are adequately prepared for the introduction of the carbon pollution reduction scheme," chamber chief executive Peter Shinnick said.

The research shows the aluminium sector, the most emission-intensive group in the region, would suffer the most.

Depending on the carbon trajectory and renewable energy targets used, it was possible local plants would stop investing in new capital.

"If it were to eventuate, the loss of the aluminium sector would see the gradual loss of $1.7 billion of revenue and about 2000 employees directly and a further loss of $1.1 billion of revenue and 4650 employees through indirect flow-on impacts," Mr Shinnick said.

He said he was aware of several Hunter companies that had deferred about $1 billion worth of capital investment until the uncertainty about emissions trading had been resolved. More than half of the small to medium businesses surveyed either agreed or strongly agreed that climate change would have a direct impact on their businesses over the next 20 years.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This is ridiculous. We have known for years that we are going to have to alter things to survive climate change and that a carbon cost would more than likely come in. So why is the Hunter Business Chamber being so dozy and getting around to thinking about it now and why isn't its report dealing with how to change to deal with it instead of being so negative. What is this report? Just another bit of special pleading to be allowed free permits under an ETS or it doesn't know what it is talking about. Either way it should move along and let people who do know how to deal with Australia's future take the reins of businesses in the Hunter.
Posted by Jeremy C, 1/12/2008 5:38:06 AM
We are completly wasting our time with any scheme that does not encompass and have full support of all nations.
Posted by alanm, 1/12/2008 12:45:11 PM
if the state govrnment was serious about pollution it would stop issuing new mine site licenses, especialy since we cant move what's already there through the port quick enough anyway.
Posted by just a thought, 1/12/2008 12:58:36 PM
Dirty Industries that have been reaping billions from our region for years have no right to complain about a tax that they should have been preparing for long ago & I might add should NOT be allowed FREE permits to continue filthy polluting practices.Eraring Energy Power Station paid NSW Govt(The shareholder)profits in excess of $150 million in 2008!!Why should they be given any allowances? Only the inadequate businesses will be unprepared to move forward to ensure we all have a sustainable future.Start now to invest in renewable & clean industries for continuing profit.Stop complaining.
Posted by Climate Crisis, 1/12/2008 3:20:32 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Travelworld_See the World
 
Rovert
 
 
Klosters Golf GTI
 
Scholarships
 
School Newspaper Competition
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...