News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Fear for creeks in Lake mine plan 

Fear for creeks in Lake mine plan

06 Jan, 2011 03:00 AM
State officials have raised concerns that a coalmine extension planned at West Wallsend will damage creeks in the Sugarloaf State Conservation Area.

The Department of Environment and Climate Change has twice urged mine owner Xstrata to give serious consideration to avoid mining areas at a low depth under streams, but the company has refused.

The Department of Planning, which is assessing Xstrata's plan, will have the final say on the matter.

The environment department said the low-depth areas were almost entirely in the government-owned conservation reserve.

The environment department has raised its concerns in a submission to the planning department.

The environment department said the plan could cause subsidence leading to loss of water flow and vegetation, threatening wildlife and ecosystems.

In a report to the planning department, Xstrata said cracking was only possible in an 84-hectare area, less than 11 per cent of the mining area.

The environment department said Xstrata planned to monitor changes and wait for any cracks to close naturally before taking remedial action.

Xstrata said regular checking and resealing of cracks would occur, but its report makes several references to the ability of cracks to "self-heal" with fine soil filling cracks.

The Xstrata report said remediation would probably be limited to areas where there was a potential public risk.

The report said if remediation was required small bulldozers would remove the canopy, shrubs and ground layers to gain access.

The environment department said crack repairs had "mixed success in recent years in NSW and often required significant vegetation clearance and vehicle access".

Xstrata says its plan, which includes mining up to 5.5 million tonnes of coal a year over the next 10 to 12 years, could cause up to 2.5 metres of mine subsidence.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
a potential of 2.5m subsidence?? quite simply: this is not acceptable. it is a conservation area - therefore no risks should allowed or taken. however, i bet the mining goes ahead. king coal is more powerful than the government.
Posted by judgedredd, 6/01/2011 6:33:43 AM, on The Herald
DECC just might be right on this one. Some mining companies are very hard headed and know which advisers tend to tread a "soft" line. Big is not always right, just profitable.

Have seen the severe damage shallow longwall mining does in this area. Have seen how ineffectual "sealing" of such cracking is. There is a poor track record in this area of mine subsidence. Just look around both sides of Lake Macquarie.

Posted by crack'nleak, 6/01/2011 7:12:46 AM, on The Herald
Once again a mining megamonster plunders the earth and does not want to take responsibility. We have to stand up against these barbarians who destroy our heritage. I urge all to support Newcastle's Rising Tide, The Wilderness Society and The Greens.
Posted by george, 6/01/2011 7:20:13 AM, on The Herald
The Government can't have it both ways - ie: give a Mining company approval to mine then expect them to act responsibly when areas of high sensitivity were allowed to be included in the mine boundary.

This is a minor skirmish in the context of the overall Mining destruction of large areas of rural NSW.

Sensitive environmental & Farming areas will be mined as per the Mine companies business plans that have been approved by the NSW Gov. & they will only then worry about covering up or avoiding responsibility for any damage after they get the Coal sold off & the share holders paid.

They have been given permission to act this way by the NSW Gov. who is the single authority that sells & approves Mining leases as well as set the guidelines they must adhere to. Just as they are also inline for royalties & kick backs from the Coal sales these mines they approve generate.

You go figure what the outcome will be, most probably just like it is everywhere Coal Mines are ripping up the county we will see more “environmental compromises” to enable the Mining to continue.


Posted by SPARKS, 6/01/2011 7:21:06 AM, on The Herald
"The Department of Environment and Climate Change has twice urged mine owner Xstrata to give serious consideration to avoid mining areas at a low depth under streams, but the company has refused." well we all know who has the power, just ask kevin rudd
Posted by Cant Eat Money, 6/01/2011 7:41:41 AM, on The Herald
And you just have to look to Wakefield on Western Lake Macquarie, There is an area of Hundreds of acres, with a 12 foot fence that is unaccessable, the subsidance has now penetrated past this fence, one of the reasons the coal haul road now has gates. If you combine all the subsidenced areas it amounts to an awful lot of land, AND, as we all know these companies cut and run all the time. If you require an example have a look at the old Gartlee colliery that was closed in the 60's (good example i know) but it is still burning in these areas west of Lake Macquarie. They have tried many times to extinquish but to no avail
Posted by Bigbox, 6/01/2011 8:08:33 AM, on The Herald
Hey you mining grubs, hands off our Conservation Area. Stop them please.
Posted by Kate, 6/01/2011 8:59:30 AM, on The Herald
Interests of the private and government sectors always seem to conflict with each other. We should not assume that those giant mining companies will protect public interests, as their target is to make big profits with the least cost to their company. It is the government that gives permits to those companies, and it should at the same time protect public interests.
Posted by FG, 6/01/2011 11:54:11 AM, on The Herald
When will we ever wake up to the fact that coal mining is short term gain for long term pain!!!

This country is becoming a mine for overseas owned companies who treat us like a third world country and buy us off with high wages, until the mine closes and we are left to clean up the mess. Where is the benefit in that for all australians???

Posted by David V, 6/01/2011 1:04:36 PM, on The Herald
'george', you would have us support Rising Tide and the Greens? Idiots to fend off your barbarians? No way!
Posted by Seven of eight, 6/01/2011 1:57:39 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
Landcom Sanctuary 190512
 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...