News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Fig feud has Newcastle councillors in a jam 

Fig feud has Newcastle councillors in a jam

31 Jul, 2010 04:00 AM
A FEUD over figs is threatening to derail the civic agenda as fears mount about elected leaders' ability to make decisions.

The impasse over 14 trees in Laman Street, Cooks Hill, brewing for more than year, is proving a stumbling block for Newcastle councillors half way through their term.

Some are worried about repeating the mistakes of past councils that took three years to remove a rock from Shortland Esplanade and went $1 million over budget restoring Newcastle Ocean Baths.

The latest saga started in May 2009 with a council report saying the Laman Street figs posed a public safety risk and should be replaced.

After decisions made and reversed, consultation and more reports, the matter is to be considered again next month.

Lord mayor John Tate said the council had "pussyfooted around for months" and must act now.

"If council doesn't make a decision about this and stick with it and implement it, this is a valid comparison with the rock on the Esplanade that sat there for so long," he said.

"And I'm disappointed that council's allowed itself to get into this situation when all that was required was a clear decision."

Cr Aaron Buman served with with Cr Tate and Michael Osborne on the present and previous council of 2004-08.

He said the incumbents that started as a strong decision making group were wavering.

"The thing that concerns me over all of this is it will affect on the ratepayer because. . .decisions aren't getting made," he said.

Pressure from vocal minorities was a problem, Cr Buman said.

Cr Osborne said a lack of information to make evidence-based decisions was to blame.

Cr Nuatali Nelmes said the situation was ridiculous given that the council requested a staged removal in May, but received subsequent reports about cutting down all the figs.

"I think the other councillors banging on about it are grandstanding."

Cr Sharon Claydon said the council had been consulting the community, which was never a waste of time. But it could move forward.

"The last thing I would want to see is for us to remain in this limbo land," she said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Newcastle Council is a politicised mess. These trees should be properly cared for and looked after, as is best practice everywhere else except here. Those figs are beautiful, and if they need to be replaced, then it should have been done with staged replacements, not the scorched tree stump earth policy of this rabble. As to the rock, why did they not just tip it over the edge? That's where the rock wanted to go. Don't rock the rock. With the trees, they will do what they want to do. I reckon turn the whole street into a park and there will be no problems. No car need be injured. Is that what all this is about? Trees verses cars? Remove the nasty ugly fencing and always remember, NCC, who you are supposed to be serving.
Posted by hey hey ho ho, 31/07/2010 6:36:29 AM, on The Herald
What about all the other trees in the LGA? Its common for trees to drop branches or to topple over, Thats nature. Just pay the insurance premium, open the road and let nature manage the trees.
Posted by Bigfeller, 31/07/2010 8:12:11 AM, on The Herald
Cut them down and replace with advanced grown specimen trees. Get on with it Council.
Posted by whatajoke, 31/07/2010 8:19:26 AM, on The Herald
$70.000 for laman st fig consultation? what aload. i know ppl who deliberately attended & purposely took time off work to discuss the Laman st fig issue. The Fig topic was allocated a small proportion of the micro managed "charette". it was a total civic precinct charette not Laman st Figs.Fig supporters were very critical of the event .
Posted by GO FIGure, 31/07/2010 8:45:42 AM, on The Herald
Nobbys breakwater carries a disclaimer sign against injury from waves. Put the same at each end of Laman Street and the problem is solved and everyones' happy right?
Posted by pablo, 31/07/2010 9:16:52 AM, on The Herald
A person that owns a Nursery is a councillor these day, time to listen to the expertise from a person within that industry as fig trees have a certain lifespan. Does someone have to die from branch limb falling in a public/ traffic orienated area before people work it out. That area of the street has been getting closed for years every time there is a storm with winds blowing. If there is not a safety concern why don't these people have a demonstration during a windy day to prove this problem isn't happening.
Posted by Jacaranda Jack, 31/07/2010 9:59:28 AM, on The Herald
Council.. You know what needs to be done, you've had the reports and now it's time to act. Get rid of the dangerous trees, otherwise we are going to end up with a street that is a no go zone. Don't be bullied by the self interest groups. We all love the look of that avenue of beautiful trees but they are dangerous. You need to do the job that you are being paid to do and make a decision that is for the benefit of all, whether some agree with that decision or not. Surely you don't want to be remembered as another council that just sat on it's hands. Man up and JUST DO IT!
Posted by thingamy, 31/07/2010 10:15:54 AM, on The Herald
Never rush a decision about trees...If we were in Europe they would be saving them to the enth degree.They are a treasure for their beauty, and cool shade in the searing heat of summer, they are to be saved and kept at all costs, grow up Australia, not everything is about quick fixes and money!!!
Posted by sarah, 1/08/2010 10:45:49 AM, on The Herald
The Herald poll related to this article is very unhelpful and deliberately contentious. I disagree with both comments attached to the 'yes' and the 'no' options and I challenge the Herald to help sophisticate this very serious debate.
Posted by Shintaro, 1/08/2010 10:45:49 AM, on The Herald
This issue has been based on faulty data and should be investigated for it's waste of tax payers money. The risk has been assessed for whether persons or property would be injured or damaged in the event of a tree's complete failure and NOT the risk of this failure actually occurring. This faulty risk assessment, it would appear, has been put forward for some fairly obvious reasons. It has always been Lord Mayor John Tate's ambition to extend the development of the art gallery to some very unrealistic proportions primarily for his name to be immortalized. Removing the trees is the obvious first step needed for his ego to realize this fantasy. I suggest his personal ambitions be checked and those who would profit from this development be kept out of the decision making process and let council deal with Newcastle's real issues and pressing development needs. This is not the same as the rock at Shortland Esplanade and this comparison is highly misleading. The problem has been grossly exaggerated and why the risk has been allowed to be assessed in such a misleading manner should be a matter of official investigation.
Posted by karismac, 1/08/2010 6:32:17 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Is Newcastle City Council taking too long to make a decision about the Laman Street fig trees?

Yes, 14 months dithering over 14 trees is too long for a city with so much work to do
(77.1%)

No, they should take all the time they need to make the right decision
(22.9%)

Total Votes: 201
Poll Date: 30 July, 2010

Most popular articles

1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB44 plans 12%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 6%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 2%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 2%
5) Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro37 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press

Travelworld_See the World
 
School Newspaper Competition


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...