News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Fig trees offer still stands 

Fig trees offer still stands

19 Nov, 2011 07:01 AM
Newcastle MP Tim Owen says the state government's offer to intervene in the Laman Street fig fiasco is "as strong as ever", and urged Newcastle City Council to act decisively to settle the dispute.

Mr Owen weighed in to the debate after the NSW Land and Environment Court granted an injunction that will ensure the council votes again on the removal of the street's 14 fig trees.

Save Our Figs and several councillors will now push to halt the chainsaws in favour of an independent risk assessment.

Read Herald senior writer Greg Ray's opinion about the Laman Street fig saga by clicking here.

The Newcastle Herald reported on Thursday that an internal council memo had raised concerns about the ability of such an assessment to settle the dispute.

Council general manager Phil Pearce wrote that any assessment that argued the trees were safe would have to be "weighted" against existing reports and would not "erase the body of knowledge already in existence".

But Mr Owen said any new evaluation of risk must have the ability to settle the dispute.

"There needs to be a very strong, decisive process, whatever they do," Mr Owen said.

The government's position has not changed, and it will only intervene if requested by the council.

Mr Owen said the government could provide an arborist to conduct a review.

Newcastle lord mayor John Tate said community activists and councillors had already agreed to be bound by the results of a genuine independent assessment.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The NCC GM appears to be attempting to prejudice any 'independent assessment' by suggesting that it would be required to consider the flawed previous assessments by NCC staff.

Not so.

A properly conducted 'independent assessment' would actually start from scratch & completely avoid any earlier reports to form its own 'independent assessment'.


Posted by Machiavelli, 19/11/2011 5:30:25 AM, on The Herald
There can only be one solution to this costly mess: chop chop chop, then replant. Send SOF the total $2.5M bill to be payable by Dec 24. Costs must have risen an extra $1 M in the last two months.

Submitted via iPhone App

Posted by Figpudding, 19/11/2011 5:48:24 AM
So how will the 2 Lib councillors Jackson and Luke vote now? Will they change their mind again, now that state Lib member of Newcastle Tim Owen has spoken. people have said this has become political and the actions of these 2 councillors has demonstrated just how political.
Posted by Judy, 19/11/2011 6:48:04 AM, on The Herald
It is good to see Tim Owen finally saying something on this - safe to voice an opinion now the court has made a decision. What about speaking with Don Page the Minister for Local Govt - didn't you tell the big business end of town you would speak to him about early elections........how did that go? Lots of words in the press but little action!!!!
Posted by Beth, 19/11/2011 6:53:27 AM, on The Herald
Anything to keep our minds on the little things over the big ones like the rail line. You've got a vested interest in keeping this going for years, Owen. Looks like we've got another Jodi Decay on our hands here...
Posted by James, 19/11/2011 7:10:14 AM, on The Herald
"Newcastle lord mayor John Tate said community activists and councillors had already agreed to be bound by the results of a genuine independent assessment."

And if you believe the SOF her won't re-chain themselves to whatever they can in Laman St if things go against them, you're kidding yourself.

Posted by No. 4, 19/11/2011 7:20:03 AM, on The Herald
The council has already voted to remove the figs.

We have a democratic process that is being abused by a few misguided environmentalists.

Posted by GeorgeJ, 19/11/2011 7:53:21 AM, on The Herald
Mr Owens should talk. "a very strong, decisive process" is not part of his activity as he has been our member for almost a year and in my opinion done diddly squat.

No expo, no money for any major project and today no Post Office and no ferry.

Posted by Fizzer, 19/11/2011 8:07:31 AM, on The Herald
so what is the NCC Liberal Crs' position on this? bit of a worry if they get an independent ' pre determined' aborists assessment. Id love to know more about the nsw state aborists & their role.
Posted by Ali, 19/11/2011 8:10:46 AM, on The Herald
Is the Mayor suggesting previous assessments undertaken were "not independent, nor genuine"? What possible motive would Councillors have not to base their decisions on credible evidence already presented for their consideration? The great fig conspiracy, come off it! Would seem fig supporters are trying to discredit evidence already available on the hope a further assessment may come out in their favour. Surely if the trees remain, over time there will become a continuing burden on ratepayers as they age and deteriorate. In 10 years time then what?
Posted by Never Ending Burden, 19/11/2011 9:51:46 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
15 November, 2011

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...