News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 GPT believes Newcastle CBD plan has support 

GPT believes Newcastle CBD plan has support

11 Jun, 2010 09:49 AM
CHIEF executive Michael Cameron believes The GPT Group has enough support to make the proposed $600 million Newcastle CBD development a reality despite more resistance from the Save Our Rail lobbyists.

GPT had previously said it would only proceed if the heavy inner-city rail line was removed or redeveloped to allow access from its Hunter Street Mall precinct to the harbour.

Mr Cameron said on Wednesday the development company would be happy with a light rail concept if that was the state government’s preferred option.

Save Our Rail president Joan Dawson said her group would accept light rail as an additional service, not as a replacement for heavy rail, also suggesting building over the top of the rail corridor.

Paul Murphy from the Fix Our City group labelled Mrs Dawson’s comments yesterday as ‘‘irrational, marginal and not grounded in reality’’.

‘‘They [Save Our Rail] have no viable, practical strategy for the future of the Newcastle CBD,’’ Mr Murphy said.

‘‘And they have completely and utterly confirmed the community’s perception that they are not the slightest bit interested in really revitalising the Newcastle CBD.

‘‘Now is the time to stop listening to this minority group. The majority has clearly spoken.

‘‘We all want to see the city come back to life.’’

Mr Cameron said he was confident the GPT development would go ahead despite the comments from the Save Our Rail Group.

‘‘We will continue to work with all the interested parties and I suspect the support is there,’’ Mr Cameron said.

‘‘We are looking for some certainty from the state government on the way forward so we can get on with it or move on.’’

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
why dont we just stop all rail services at broadmeadow for a while? provide free buses from there into towm? see what happens..... and in the meantime, stop letting letting people like this one try and tell us that the raiil should be cut when they admit they are not tranpsort speciialists. they are developers. read between the lines. they want to develop property to make money. they are not future orientated. they are for now. they get in. they get out. as simple as that. we need to get a transport specialist in and go with what they recommend instead we have this divisive argument being prolonged by our dithering elected representatives. i still think that 650 million dollars just to remove the rail is ridiculous. how many quotes did we get? as much as it annoys people, why cant we build an underground rail line? we could have our cake and eat it too...... and create lots of jobs. and i dont buy anything the fix our city lot are selling either. they are the ones with the property to develop, they are the ones practically holding this city to ransom whilst holding hands with gpt. ordinary efforts from lots of people.
Posted by judgedredd, 11/06/2010 6:22:21 AM, on The Herald
Why should I trust Michael Cameron?
Posted by ffs, 11/06/2010 6:27:20 AM, on The Herald
Thank you Joan Dawson. That's the best thing you could have said. Now that the Save Our Rail group is completely discredited we can get on with fixing the city.
Posted by ph, 11/06/2010 8:25:22 AM, on The Herald
Claiming a majority doesn't make it so.
Posted by metoo, 11/06/2010 8:31:33 AM, on The Herald
Don't get ahead of yourself Paul Murphy. The majority has spoken and said they want light rail. The Fix Our City position of removing the rail line completely is also a minority position, according to yesterday's poll. Fix Our City should publicly revise its position in light of the events of the last few days. We all need to work together on this in a professional manner and it serves noone's interest for lobby groups to start claiming the moral high ground. The majority are calling for light rail in the CBD so we are looking for our politicians and community leaders to make it happen.
Posted by Light Rail enthusiast, 11/06/2010 8:37:54 AM, on The Herald
It is surely time that GPT updates it proposal. Is it true that it is now about 1/3 the original size, has one or less majors, contains considerable residential units and is smaller in size than Market Town? I wouild like to know how it can be sustainable given the tiny population surrounding the site.
Posted by Bigfeller, 11/06/2010 8:58:36 AM, on The Herald
Bloggers may like to compare the details on the SOR and FOC web sites and judge for themselves which group has a plan for the CBD. I suspect it is Mr Murphy who is talking before engaging in responsible research. I look forward to reading the FOC plan in the near future.
Posted by Bigfeller, 11/06/2010 9:04:20 AM, on The Herald
Let's see, all they want are hundreds of millions of dollars in commitment, from the taxpayers, to move a big slice of the University and either to rip up a major NSW transport link or to build an expensive light rail replacement which at best will only give the same carrying capacity. What's more they want it now! In return the people of the region will get another tacky mega shopping centre just like Charlestown or Katora. I read with interest the "inpriring" young Professor's comments as reported at the FOC meeting. He mentioned I believe how Newcastle had been ruined by letting the property developers/speculators have control of city development. How is the GPT proposal superior to any of the others?
Posted by qazimoto, 11/06/2010 9:07:29 AM, on The Herald
The debate on light rail well researched and proposed by people like Tim Bohlsen and Alan Squires is to be commended.We must change but we need a clear vision and to rely on funding to achieve that. it is great to see that GPT is encompassing that new vision.Up the light rail remove the heavy rail!!
Posted by visionary, 11/06/2010 9:23:50 AM, on The Herald
Good to see the shift in viewpoint from GPT, but it still doesn't mean that their development provides all the answers. On the other hand, it is time to accept that there will never again be a need for heavy rail into eastern Newcastle. More confrontingly perhaps, people need to consider whether it makes any sense for David Jones (or any other major shopping development) to remain in the Hunter Street mall precinct. I suspect not.
Posted by rickeyre, 11/06/2010 9:40:26 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
10 June, 2010

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...