News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Greens vow to block Tillegra levy 

Greens vow to block Tillegra levy

25 Oct, 2010 03:00 AM
The Greens would move to block any legislative attempts of a new Coalition government to charge Hunter Water users for an infrastructure fund, upper house MP John Kaye says.

The Coalition said it would have the power to order the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal to include a charge for the fund when it set Hunter water prices.

That would in effect replace the current charges to Hunter Water users for the Tillegra Dam, which the Coalition said it would not build.

The money would instead be spent on infrastructure, which the Coalition said Labor had neglected.

The news prompted a response from the Combined Pensioners and Superannuants Association, calling for an end to paying for Tillegra Dam because their budgets were already stretched to breaking point.

A spokeswoman for the association said they and other Hunter Waters customers were already paying record prices for water, partly as a result of the $477million dam.

The association also called on Opposition Leader Barry O’Farrell to clarify the Opposition’s position on funding the dam.

Dr Kaye said on Friday that the proposal was ‘‘stupid’’, ‘‘unjust in the extreme’’ and unlawful, and the Greens would try to block in the upper house the legislation the Coalition would have to introduce.

‘‘They should show that they would be a government that can admit their mistakes and dump the idea now,’’ he said.

The shadow cabinet is due to meet in Maitland on Friday.

Liberal candidates Robyn Parker (Maitland) and Andrew Cornwell (Charlestown) have backed the fund proposal as a means of delivering infrastructure rather than ‘‘a dam nobody wants’’.

Port Stephens Liberal MP Craig Baumann said charging water users for the fund was ‘‘not my preferred option’’.

‘‘But the state is broke and we need to kick start the economy,’’ he said.

‘‘I see this as seed funding for when we get the economy moving.’’

Swansea candidate Garry Edwards, who was endorsed this week, declined to comment as he wanted to find out more information about the proposal.

A Liberal Party candidate for Newcastle has yet to be announced, but is tipped to be retired Air Commodore Tim Owen.

Other candidates are expected to be confirmed during the Maitland visit.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Now I know how the people of Nottingham must have felt in Robin Hood's era. The people of the Hunter must look like the peasants back then, with their leaders and ours treating us all the same. "Oh, look. The peasants might have a little more money to spend. Let's take it from them and leave our coffers for our next pay rise." Will someone with credibility stand up for the Hunter people and get rid of this dam and give us back our money?
Posted by Dave, 25/10/2010 5:59:52 AM, on The Herald
The Greens never stopped Hunter Water from levying us for something that was not even approved in an area that would destroy pristine land forever. While I don't agree with a levy for infratstructure, because we already pay for that as everything we buy and do is taxed to death, at least it had merit in comparison to paying for "hot air". The current levy is wrong.
Posted by Rose- Lake Macquarie, 25/10/2010 6:28:32 AM, on The Herald
There is no reason why the $80m per year sent to Sydney by Hunter Water can not be retained in the Hunter and used to fuel the infrastructure fund.
Posted by Bigfeller, 25/10/2010 6:48:36 AM, on The Herald
Yeah! Sure, Craig. Let's start by kicking Hunter Water users where it hurts. The whole state is already being levied to pay for infrastructure in Sydney. People want to drought-proof the state (not just the Hunter area). Start by filling in all the home pools with dirt and helping home owners install water tanks, not dams we don't want or need. Hardly a smart country.
Posted by El Zorro, 25/10/2010 7:00:47 AM, on The Herald
Should politicians be allowed to decline to comment, without 'getting' back to us with a noted comment?
Posted by just a thought, 25/10/2010 7:03:40 AM, on The Herald
A question for all these Liberal candidates: If we have to pay a levy on our water charges for Hunter infrastructure, do the rest of the state regions get to pay the same levy for theirs, especially Sydney? The Hunter already pays enough in levies and does not receive its fair share. It's about time Sydney, in particular, is hit to pay for its needs, and not the rest of the state to make up for shortfalls.
Posted by Equality, 25/10/2010 8:10:37 AM, on The Herald
It's a sad day when the Greens are making more sense than all other parties combined. Sad day indeed.
Posted by Scott Hillard, 25/10/2010 8:48:14 AM, on The Herald
The Greens have stood idly by for more than 15 years while NSW Labor has ripped excessive dividends and tax equivalents from Hunter Water customers. There is no evidence of them objecting to the dividend. Ditto Labor members, with the exception of Bob Martin in 1991, for which he was severely punished.
Posted by Gladys, 25/10/2010 8:54:36 AM, on The Herald
We have some local Liberal MPs and candidates who behave like servants to their Sydney-centric masters. Dividends from Hunter Water, Macquarie Generation et al can fund Hunter-based infrastructure projects, not Hunter Water customers. Stand up for your region, locally based MPs and candidates! Look after our region and stand up to metro-centric attitudes to regional investment.
Posted by Mark, 25/10/2010 9:00:15 AM, on The Herald
I want my money back.
Posted by judgedredd, 25/10/2010 9:01:02 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
DAM MONEY: An artist’s aerial view impression of the proposed Tillegra Dam which will not be built by a Coalition state government.
DAM MONEY: An artist’s aerial view impression of the proposed Tillegra Dam which will not be built by a Coalition state government.

Most popular articles


 
Landcom Sanctuary 190512
 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...