News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Guards to protect public from Laman Street figs 

Guards to protect public from Laman Street figs

17 Dec, 2009 04:00 AM
BARRIERS could be put up around trees in Laman Street to try to limit the threat of the failing figs to passing pedestrians and traffic.

The action would be in addition to risk mitigation measures that Newcastle City Council is already implementing over the next week along the Cooks Hill strip, between Darby and Dawson streets.

These include closing the road to east-bound traffic, banning parking and removing seats under the trees in adjacent Civic Park.

The street is also closed whenever wind speed exceeds 50 kmh.

Infrastructure services manager John Johnston said yesterday that an arborist and other consultants were expected to review the control measures to determine if they were adequate.

If not, the council would look at doing more work, including setting up exclusion zones, which might involve putting barriers around the figs, he said.

Most councillors agreed in November to remove and replace the trees because of the public safety threat, but that decision was overturned on Tuesday.

Community workshops will now be held early next year to consider preferred designs for Laman Street.

Mr Johnston said everything was on the table, including a 2005 Civic Park management plan.

It proposed closing Laman Street to traffic, removing the fig trees in front of the library and art gallery and creating grassy, tiered platforms in front of the buildings.

Ways to keep the trees would also be considered.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This is the greatest load of beauracratic BS I have ever heard. Are we going to have guards at Islington Park fig trees? Are we going to have guards with us when we walk in Blackbutt? Are we going to have guards when we walk/ride on the Fernleigh Track? Any tree branch can fall at any time, so I guess to reduce the risk to an acceptable level, i.e. zero for NCC, the next step is to rid Newcastle of trees. PS- how do the guards know which branch is going to fall, and stop the branch from falling?
Posted by Steve, 17/12/2009 6:45:05 AM, on The Herald
Here we go again,just like the fence around that big nasty dangerous ship.Boy we take some looking after.
Posted by horse, 17/12/2009 8:00:58 AM, on The Herald
Good to hear, but always remember, every storm the problem will occur again and again and again. Lets just hope it doesn't it hurt people when the branches drop around a building very popular and use by many children called Newcastle Libary or Newcastle art gallery. It's a very popular area good old Lanman street. One question, who planted them and what year were they planted? Fig trees have a certain life span
Posted by it only takes one, 17/12/2009 8:40:25 AM, on The Herald
when are ratbags very dangerous? when they organise themselves into groups.
Posted by ffs, 17/12/2009 9:10:07 AM, on The Herald
Seems to me that we are just delaying the inevitable. I agree that the trees are wonderful but sooner or later they have to come down before someone or something is damaged. Lets do it now so we can leave a decent legacy for the future.
Posted by Ianola%0d%0ai, 17/12/2009 9:15:16 AM, on The Herald
Steve - I think they mean physical barriers like fencing etc, not human "guards"....
Posted by butterfly, 17/12/2009 11:10:58 AM, on The Herald
Steve, the guards referred to in the article are not human guards. I believe the guards will be some sort of ugly contraption surrounding the trees which are designed to "catch" any falling branches.
Posted by Why?, 17/12/2009 11:25:14 AM, on The Herald
Butterfly, my comments and questions still apply. Are we going to put fences around every tree? It's a joke.
Posted by Steve, 17/12/2009 11:59:26 AM, on The Herald
One of the main factors here is that the Council lost all credibility regarding tree risk when they used it as an excuse to cut down the figs on the bottom half of Tyrell St when it was totally obvious to all that it was about enabling Energy Australia to lay new cables to the substation. Why else did they stop half way up, exactly past the substation? If you read the reports regarding the Laman St figs you will see that they angle from a view of justifying removal. The assessment that the figs are 500x more risky than a "normal" tree is meaningless and ridiculous. And now we have traffic being banned (but only one way?) while pedestrians are allowed. Things don't add up. Until Council come clean with their real reasons the Community won't accept their decision making.
Posted by grub, 17/12/2009 12:24:46 PM, on The Herald
spot on. They're not talking about security guards, but barriers around the trees. It's actually pretty obvious in the story if you read it properly.
Posted by davey, 17/12/2009 1:30:58 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
ON TRIAL: The Hill's figs in Laman Street are safe for now.
ON TRIAL: The Hill's figs in Laman Street are safe for now.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Bounce
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...