News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Hunter couple protest over surge in water cost 

Hunter couple protest over surge in water cost

02 Dec, 2009 04:00 AM
ADAMSTOWN retirees Tom and Ann Grabau are water misers.

They keep a bucket in the shower to put on the garden.

They wash their dishes in the sink and only use the dishwasher on rare occasions.

The fine print on their water bills shows their water consumption is just 35 per cent of the household average.

Yet the Grabaus have just had their Hunter Water bill rise from $117.71 to $189.60, and like others who have written to The Herald on the issue, they blame Tillegra Dam for the extra impost.

"Our pensioner rebate has gone up, and that's something, but when water use is only about 20 per cent of the total bill, you have to wonder what's happened to their 'user pays' system," Mr Grabau said yesterday.

Newcastle retiree Wilton Ainsworth, a former head of Comsteel and former chairman of the state-owned Newcastle Port Corporation, likened Hunter Water's new charges to Telstra lifting the price of telephone rental as it lost earnings to mobile phone companies.

"You can change phone companies but you're stuck with Hunter Water," Mr Ainsworth said yesterday.

"I'm not struggling, obviously, but the water bill for our 10 apartments has risen by 45 per cent when measured by the amount of water used."

The new charges were announced in July by the state-run Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal, which said it had granted about half of what Hunter Water had wanted.

The tribunal said the increase was about 30 per cent over four years.

A typical Hunter bill would go from $718 a year to $817 in 2009-10, $857 in 2010-11, $897 in 2011-12 and $939 in 2012-13.

Hunter Water managing director Kevin Young said Tillegra accounted for just 8 per cent of this year's rise and 15 per cent by 2012-13.

Mr Young said he appreciated that any increase was "difficult, especially for pensioners".

He said the State Government had lifted the pensioner rebate by $37 to $212, meaning it would cover nearly one-third of a typical pensioner bill.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
8 percent of the bill and counting. If this proposed dam gets the approval and work begins on it they will then bring out the information which they haven't so far that there have been more geological faults found that will cost more to fix. The dam will go from an initial cost in 2007 of $345 million(and that was with a waste water treatment plant included on Kooragang) now quoted at $477 million in 2009 (without the waste water plant) to God knows what when the real extent of the geology is brought out sometime in the future. One thing I know, my pockets are bleeding "where has it all gone?" my money that is.
Posted by Dave, 2/12/2009 6:53:58 AM
We have a situation whereby the Water Board in now charging extra rates 'levy' to help cover the costs of building Tilligra Dam that we don't need in this area, that has yet to start. Then we have the power companies charging extra for the Emission Trading Scheme that has not even been adopted by anybody as yet. If both schemes fall over and never begin, will the rate payers receive rebates for monies paid?
Posted by MizJasper, 2/12/2009 7:34:35 AM
Well are the costs relative to the product supplied. What does it cost to deliver a litre of water to a house. I wonder why Hunter Water haven't blamed climate change for having to put the price up, maybe I should not have given them that idea.
Posted by Jimbob, 2/12/2009 7:47:19 AM
Hunter water has been increasing water bills via stealth for a number of years now. Obviously, they are restricted to capped increases by ipart, however for a long time hunter water has been increasing the service charges, thereby ruducing both the incentive and water saving initiatives that we have been implementing. We are water frugal, buying 4 star washing machines, rainwater tanks, grey water recycling, however with increased "service" charges, the real savings in cost outlay has been negated entirely. If hunter water was serious about reducing water usage, higher water costs coupled with much lesser service charges would have been positive for water conservation. It just appears that Hunter Water and more specifically, the NSW state government is just trying to milk the Hunter for easy cash. Tillegra dam is a White elephant that will cost at least double of what has been suggested. Like all state projects. I doubt we would get water credits when water is sold to Sydney. Nor am I amused developers levies will not pay their share for future consumption. The whole thing stinks of robbery.
Posted by Angryman, 2/12/2009 8:03:51 AM
outrageous!
Posted by Ears, 2/12/2009 8:36:15 AM
User pays has ended now. Most of your bill is "fixed charges". I am off into the garden now to fill up the pool and put the sprinklers on the lawns and gardens. Then I will come in and have a 15 minute shower. And it won't make any difference to my water bill.
Posted by Den Isles, 2/12/2009 9:48:28 AM
Hunter Water are charging us for a dam that has not been approved. Are they going to give our money back when the dam is proven to be unnecessary, too costly and environmentally destructive? How can we have faith in the processes of EPBC and the public submission period of the Department of Planning when they are allowed to start charging us for a dam that is still being reviewed?
Posted by William, 2/12/2009 10:41:03 AM
My water rates increased about 8% ($14 out of $200) in the last bill. But I can't see how the rates would jump so much without the customers simply increasing their water usage. I don't think its that bad for pensioners (as I am ) as the rebates have gone up and so have pensions in recent times.
Posted by Little Increase, 2/12/2009 11:03:19 AM
This is appalling. Hunter water users have always been on the conservational side, regardless of our dams being up near full the majority of the time. We pay for services that the community is protesting against and for water that we will not use, why are Sydney Water users not paying a levy for their dam at Tillegra if that is who it is for?
Posted by Naomi, 2/12/2009 11:24:36 AM
We need to take a stand. We cannot allow excessive charges imposed on us by the State Government and it's various corporations drive us out of town. I am sure New South Wales is suffering from Bureaucratic Bloat and the productive economy may have already shrunk to the edge of total collapse.
Posted by Dave Hamilton, 2/12/2009 1:14:05 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
RISING ANGER: Water misers Tom and Ann Grabau at home in Adamstown yesterday. - Picture by Anita Jones
RISING ANGER: Water misers Tom and Ann Grabau at home in Adamstown yesterday. - Picture by Anita Jones
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles

Travelworld_See the World
 
 
Kloster No 1. Car Sale
 
Hunter Water_Leaking
 
Scholarships
 
Hamilton St Patricks Day
 
School Newspaper Competition
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...