News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Hunter developments back on the drawing board 

Hunter developments back on the drawing board

18 Feb, 2010 03:00 AM
CONTROVERSIAL developments at Catherine Hill Bay and Huntlee New Town at Branxton are expected to return for planning assessment within months after the State Government closed the loopholes they fell through last year.

The Herald can reveal that Planning Minister Tony Kelly has changed the Lower Hunter Regional Strategy, deleting the Achilles heel that resulted in the two major residential developments failing during court challenges last year.

The changes are sure to infuriate residents' groups that won David-and-Goliath-style battles against the developments in the NSW Land and Environment Court.

Mr Kelly is expected to announce today that he has removed references to Memorandums of Understanding [MOUs], which Environment Court Justice David Lloyd had described as "land bribes".

Justice Lloyd voided State Government approvals for almost 800 residential lots planned by developer Rose Group at Catherine Hill Bay and Gwandalan, based on the MOUs and related deeds of agreement.

The landmark decision set a precedent for Huntlee to be quashed, which occurred soon after.

Mr Kelly said the two developments would soon be back with the Planning Department, ready for reconsideration.

"The existing regional strategy, independently of those MOUs and deeds, continues to provide a clear basis for all sites in the strategy to be considered on their merits and assessed according to law," Mr Kelly said.

The state will still be able to pick up parcels of land from developers for conservation, under the changes through voluntary contributions.

"Conservation land offsets will now be facilitated through the preparation of Voluntary Planning Agreements within the framework of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act," he said.

The Government is still in talks with other developers who had signed redundant MOUs but whose applications had not been determined.

Minister for the Hunter Jodi McKay said yesterday she was pleased the Lower Hunter Regional Strategy was being reinforced.

"The strategy provides the community, local councils, developers and the Government with a clear framework for housing, employment growth and environmental protection in the Hunter," Ms McKay said.

"With an extra 160,000 people expected to call the Hunter home by 2031, it's important the Government, community and private sector have a guide to ensure growth happens appropriately."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This is another one of the reasons that this current state government needs to go. To change the rules so that a developer can have is way amounts to a criminal action. There needs to be an inquiry into the reasons behind the rule change. All the shredders need to be removed from the offices of the state labor party before they are voted out at the next election.
Posted by BJ, 18/02/2010 5:07:13 AM, on The Herald
Well of course they would be, after all we have to look after our mates don't we?
Posted by Steve, 18/02/2010 5:19:54 AM, on The Herald
Moving the goal posts. We would expect nothing less from this government. The crying shame is that they don't have the wit to see that the abandoned coal prep site at Catherine Hill Bay would be a perfect opportunity for a tourist resort rather than for suburban houses a long way from anywhere.
Posted by mac, 18/02/2010 5:24:59 AM, on The Herald
This new outrageous action by the Labor State Government will completely destroy Catherine Hill Bay and Gwandalan. We do not want to be the dumping ground for the population problems in Sydney. These substandard developments are outrageous in scale and impact. Jodi McKay and all the other Labor MPs should be ashamed of themselves, and should start cleaning out their desks.
Posted by jimmy, 18/02/2010 6:14:44 AM, on The Herald
Boy oh boy I can't wait for the State election. The voters of the Hunter need to stand against our corrupt Government and make sure that these developments do not receive approval again, ever!
Posted by Watto81, 18/02/2010 6:27:23 AM, on The Herald
Like it or not the Branxton development is absolutely essential. Its just like the cows having to move from Blacktown and the market garden from Wahroonga.
Posted by Bigfeller, 18/02/2010 8:04:31 AM, on The Herald
The proposed opening of another bar is the best news I have heard all week. Judging by the never-ending queue that we are subjected to on a Saturday night, I would like to see 50 new bars open up in Newcastle, by this weekend if possible. No doubt this post will be littered with arguments from those living in the inner city claiming they are not to old and that we don’t need any more bars in the city. If you choose to live in the inner city then you must also accept the negatives of such a lifestyle. Those who have chosen to live in the CBD must accept that there will be late night noise, which I also term “fun” by those not winding down the clock. It’s like moving to Williamtown and being surprised as aircraft noise drowns out the opening credits of “The Bill”. So the question then becomes very simple, did those who moved to the CBD not understand that there are other businesses aside from art studios that exist in the CBD or are you just like those who are successful in having airport curfews put in place?
Posted by Ron Burgundy, 18/02/2010 8:16:20 AM, on The Herald
this state government is an incompetent, corrupt joke. have read today that the Sydney metro is to be scrapped, so should Tillegra and these developments. Damn fools and liars. Labor is going to be decimated at the next election...thankfully.
Posted by what'shappeningtothiscountry, 18/02/2010 9:07:26 AM, on The Herald
it is clear that the Lower Hunter Regional Strategy needs a re-think! When the plan was drafted, Huntlee and Catherine Hill Bay were listed as TWO OF THE WORST housing sites in the Hunter. From memory, of a list of 98 sites, these two listed second and third last (or thereabouts) - ie, being amongst the LEAST suitable for future development. How then do we account for these sites being included in the Lower Hunter Regional Strategy for housing development, when 90-odd other more suitable sites where not?!?! Give me a political donation or two and I'll look into the answer! Dodgy to the max!
Posted by IAmAPlanner, 18/02/2010 9:45:16 AM, on The Herald
The current residents of Catherine Hill Bay are against any development to ensure their homes retain their $ value. How else could they sell these 2 or 3 bedroom houses for hundreds of thousands.
Posted by minsdad, 18/02/2010 10:07:47 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: Should the Huntlee and Catherine Hill Bay developments be part of the Lower Hunter Regional Strategy?

Yes to Huntlee
(16.2%)

Yes to Catherine Hill Bay
(30.6%)

No to both
(53.3%)

Total Votes: 229
Poll Date: 17 February, 2010

Most popular articles


 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...