News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Hunter private schools' big profits 

Hunter private schools' big profits

25 Jan, 2011 03:00 AM
The Hunter's wealthiest private schools posted financial surpluses of between $1 million and $2 million last year after pocketing as much as $7 million in annual government subsidies.

A Newcastle Herald investigation of Australian Securities and Investments Commission financial reports found Hunter Valley Grammar School recorded the largest profit.

Most schools do not have to declare their surpluses.

Hunter Valley Grammar School posted a profit for the year ending December 31, 2009, of $1.97 million after receiving $8.47 million in fees, $7.3 million in government funding and $308,185 from uniform sales.

Annual fees for a child in year 12 will be $13,284 this year; fees for kindergarten to year 2 will be $6664.

Last year there were 950 students at Hunter Valley Grammar School and 130 staff.

Newcastle Grammar School posted a net surplus of $1.3 million, taking retained earnings to $11 million, as at December 31, 2009.

The school received $11.3 million in fees for the year and $4.8 million in government grants.

Bad and doubtful debts, which include unpaid school fees, cost $187,964, with the school making an overall provision for bad debts of $406,980.

The school had total assets of $41.8 million and debts of $23.7 million, leaving $18 million in equity.

Annual tuition for a year 12 student this year will cost $17,350; kindergarten will cost $10,440.

A NSW Department of Education and Training spokesman declined to reveal how much the region's public schools received, but said recurrent funding amounts would be on the My Schools website this year.

NSW Greens MP John Kaye said the state and federal governments were financing "inequality" and there were no public schools in the Hunter pocketing surpluses nearing $2 million.

"These [private] schools are operating at such levels of luxury that they can afford to retain a surplus while public schools are operating hand-to-mouth," Mr Kaye said.

"The government needs to recognise public schools and divert funding away from private schools that are doing extremely well."

Hunter Valley Grammar School principal Paul Teys said he believed in transparency in school funding, and the same information should be made available for all schools - private and public.

Mr Teys said about 75 per cent of his school's costs went on salaries.

"We have to fund all our future capital development and that is what the surplus is used for," he said.

"If you don't prepare for the future you get an enormous capital bill and provide a poor level of service to fee-paying parents which would make the school not competitive in the marketplace."

Only schools that are registered as not-for-profit companies limited by guarantee must lodge financial statements with ASIC to comply with the Corporations Act.

Bishop Tyrrell Anglican College and most of the Hunter's other private schools do not have to lodge statements because they are covered by acts of Parliament, including one that covers schools associated with the Anglican Church.

Belmont Christian College reported a surplus of $189,614 after earning $2.6 million in fees and $6.2 million in government funding.

Hunter Christian School made a profit of $59,695, compared with a loss of $74,907 the previous year.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
why the hell do we, the taxpayers, subsidise private schools that charge a fortune in school fees when the public schools are struggling to make ends meet? this is wrong. i want my money back.
Posted by judgedredd, 25/01/2011 5:34:52 AM, on The Herald
In my experience public schools are not allowed to have surpluses. If there is money left from the year before then the government reduces the money for the next year by the same amount.
Posted by tina, 25/01/2011 5:48:15 AM, on The Herald
It is great to see them operate at a surplus as this will enable the continuation of quality education.

Surplus funds are used to build or pay for school buildings and facilities.

These profits are a major saving to taxpayers who would otherwise be forced to pay for extra public schools.

Posted by bigfeller, 25/01/2011 6:16:04 AM, on The Herald
Sure, Mr Teys wants financial transparency for all schools, and that is fair enough; until it leads to funding cuts to his school and re-invested back into public education, then he'll be crying poor.
Posted by Degeneration Y, 25/01/2011 7:07:15 AM, on The Herald
Is this going to be another Private School bashing session? Really, the government should fund on the number of kids. Each child should be allocated a certain value for funding. If the parents then want to top that up to send to a private school then so be it. If you can afford $10K for a kindergarten child, well i wish you all the best and your child deserves blue ribbon service.
Posted by Nafe, 25/01/2011 7:28:03 AM, on The Herald
Why do public schools educate about 2/3rd's of the children yet receive only about 1/3rd of the funding? Ludicrous. K Rudd did make some noise about levelling the playing field pre-election but once elected quickly changed his tune, probably because all those around him send their kids to private schools on their exorbitant salaries...the current PM musn't care either!
Posted by Ridiculous, 25/01/2011 8:14:55 AM, on The Herald
Am I missing something here, tell me why then isn't say for instance Lake Macquarie High getting 7 Million in Government funding. Why isn't Toronto primary receiving 7 Million in Government funding. Why don't the kids get flaming milk anymore. Fat pollies get pork though.
Posted by so over it, 25/01/2011 8:16:05 AM, on The Herald
Judgedredd - your comments are just so out of touch. Without these govy subsidies to private schools, ALL children would land on the public system which could not cope. Yes the private schools receive govt grants, but the parents pay much more to have their children attend. This is money the state system simply does not have and even if all govt funding was redirected to public schools, the system could not meet demand. Exmaine the facts old mate before blowing off yet again!
Posted by be serious, 25/01/2011 8:28:47 AM, on The Herald
if i am anti-religion as a result of recognising the problems caused by religion to society throughout history, why should I be obliged to help pay?
Posted by judgedredd, 25/01/2011 8:47:25 AM, on The Herald
The private school debate is a classic - it is the only one where the tories see good use of government funds. Talk of a per child value across the board + atopup is an insult. If the wealthy do not wish to travel to school by bus, they buy a black 4wd to clog the school 40 zones. Schools should be the same. All money goes to the public system, and then if the elite think they can do better, let them pay full tote odds. Private schools should be totally accountable for every dollar they receive - sort of like work for the dole! Mutual obligation.
Posted by dontforgetwhatshidden, 25/01/2011 9:00:06 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
25 January, 2011
POLL
Q: Do private schools get too much government funding?

Yes
(72.6%)

No
(27.4%)

Total Votes: 423
Poll Date: 24 January, 2011

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...