News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Hunter town launches legal battle over mining 

Hunter town launches legal battle over mining

07 Apr, 2011 04:00 AM
Residents of the Hunter Valley township of Camberwell will take on the might of the mining industry and the state government in a classic David and Goliath battle to win back control of their village common.

In an unprecedented legal challenge, notices of legal proceedings have been served on the NSW Lands Minister, Ashton Coal and White Mining.

At issue is control of the two-part, 90-hectare historic Camberwell Common, which had been controlled by a community trust since 1876.

That came to an abrupt end in April last year when former Lands Minister Tony Kelly resumed the land without notice and handed its control to Ashton Coal.

A related company, White Mining, lodged a mining lease application on the land in May last year.

Mr Kelly said at the time that his actions were necessary because negotiations between the common's trust and Ashton Coal about the land's future use had broken down.

The episode galvanised the 100-strong village community and their supporters, who have been campaigning against the coal industry's rampant expansion in the Upper Hunter.

"The common belongs to the people; we have fought long and hard against constant threats and harassment for years," trust secretary Deidre Olofsson said.

"If we don't take a stand there will be nothing left for the next generation."

The Environmental Defenders Office, on behalf of the trust, will challenge the legitimacy of the minister's removal of the common from trust control and place it under the Crown Lands Act.

It will also argue that White Mining should have served its notice for a mining lease application on the trust, which would then have had the right to object to it.

Environmental Defenders Office solicitor Elaine Johnson said the case involved several important public interest issues.

"Our client recently became aware that the mining company had applied for a mining lease over the common. If approved, this lease will facilitate the mining of the common, which was purportedly revoked just a few weeks before the mining lease application was submitted" Ms Johnson said.

Incoming Primary Industries Minister Katrina Hodgkinson has taken over responsibility for the administration of the Crown Lands Act.

"Given this matter is before the Land and Environment Court, it would be inappropriate to comment on the specific details," Ms Hodgkinson said last night.

"However, I understand there are concerns in the community about the process that took place under the eye of the former Labor government in managing the Camberwell Common's transfer.

"I have asked my department to prepare a report on what is the correct process for such cases."

An Ashton Coal spokesman said yesterday the company would respond to the matter in court. "Ashton Coal has complied with all requirements and government directions in relation to applications," the spokesman said.

White Mining did not return the Herald's calls.

The matter has been listed for directions on April 18.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I hope "common" sense prevails. I never understood how a piece of land called a Common, could be handed over to a single entity in the first place - when it was meant for all people in the region.

It's one thing for these mining companies to be allowed to buy the odd lot of land, but to try and crush an entire community is So unjust, and needs to be stopped.

Posted by Rose- Lake Macquarie, 7/04/2011 5:43:56 AM, on The Herald
The process by which the miners accessed the coal beneath the town common. Is perceived as just another abuse of due process. Ask your self why Minister Kelly found it necessary to take the common from the community, and place it under the control of the Crown? Could it be there was already a battle to stop any mining under the common?

Edward James

Posted by Edward James, 7/04/2011 7:58:18 AM, on The Herald
Bravo to the remaining Camberwell folk, who won't give in to corporate and government bullying and underhand tactics.

The taking of their historic Common was a cruel and greedy thing to do to this coal-besieged, dust and noise-battered village.

May the dirty linen of all involved be made public in this case, to their shame and punishment.

In the interests of transparency and fairness, let's all get behind these villagers with funding support for the case.

Posted by Sharyn, 7/04/2011 8:15:05 AM, on The Herald
THe last lot of pollies were sent packing because they forgot the people. "we left them." Keneally.

Let's hope the new lot have learned from this.

Camberwell is this government's opportunity to draw a very strong line under the past.

It must give the coal industry a new understanding of a far more constrained future. Camberwell, Gunnedah, Gloucester, Tweed - all under siege for company profit. All need intervention from their new government.

Posted by soldout, 7/04/2011 8:29:27 AM, on The Herald
well done campberwell. I hope you win.
Posted by green hornet, 7/04/2011 8:55:04 AM, on The Herald
Obviously it is time for the Seventh State between the hunter & the Queensland border & east of the Darling River so that we, who live in urban regional centres, can determine our own development projects without the interference of Sydney based commercial interests and political policies that spend mining royalties in overcrowding Sydney rather than on infrastructure projects where the royalties are created.
Posted by New State Campaigner, 7/04/2011 9:19:48 AM, on The Herald
Surely if the old minister had powers to take the land away from the people, the new minister has the power to give it back to the people.
Posted by Warwick, 7/04/2011 10:20:32 AM, on The Herald
Mr Kelly's actions were necessary, not because negotiations had broken down, but because he and his party's mining donors had no intention of negotiating, just seizing.

Well done Camberwell and the EDO. It will be a good test case of where our new "two potato" state government is heading. They might not only rubber stamp any coal deal but also allow shooting on the common. Best of luck!

Posted by Colt, 7/04/2011 11:15:56 AM, on The Herald
the solution is simple. Just give the new minister for the environment a holiday house in Camberwell and suddenly there will be a very sound reason why mining should not be allowed. Ask Frank Sartor.
Posted by dono, 7/04/2011 11:31:01 AM, on The Herald
I live at Wards River (Gloucester) and this is the type of thing that goes on here also, though no Public land has been resumed. As far as the past Government was concerned the Mines came first, second and third and the residents last. We have been fighting the Coal Mines for the last 15 years and we will continue so Camberwell you have my complete sympathy and I hope you win and get your Common back.
Posted by John the Mayor, 7/04/2011 12:03:37 PM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
COURT: Deidre Olofsson on Camberwell's village common. - Picture by Peter Stoop
COURT: Deidre Olofsson on Camberwell's village common. - Picture by Peter Stoop

Most popular articles


 
Landcom Sanctuary 190512
 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...