News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Hunter Water's Tillegra Dam sweetener 

Hunter Water's Tillegra Dam sweetener

13 Mar, 2010 04:00 AM
HUNTER Water has delivered a sweetener for the controversial Tillegra Dam project in a bid to win over its critics.

The Herald can reveal Water Minister Phil Costa will today announce extra offset measures to address social, economic and environmental impacts of the proposed $477 million dam.

The package includes:

? A 1323-hectare national park.

? The release of 2.5 billion litres of water in the Williams estuary each year to improve its flow.

? Modifications to Seaham weir to increase flows to the Hunter River estuary in dry periods.

? $1 million for road and bridge works in Dungog Shire.

? A commitment from Hunter Water to undertake all necessary road maintenance between Dungog and the dam site during the construction of Tillegra.

? The relocation of the Bendolba Rural Fire Station to a site requested by the Rural Fire Service.

The major project modifications are outlined in Hunter Water's Submissions Report, to be lodged with the NSW Department of Planning today.

Hunter Water managing director Kevin Young said the report would "put to bed" the key issues individuals and community groups had raised in their 2669 submissions to the project.

"All of the modelling shows there won't be any significant impact on the wetlands, or the estuary downstream, or the prawn and fishing industry," he said.

"Hunter Water did not use climate change calculations in its justification of the project, it used historical data, and the Government agencies that questioned the data now agree with it."

However, Mr Young said Tillegra was not impact-free.

He said the platypus population in the river section set to be dammed would be affected and the five property owners who are yet to sell to Hunter Water would be affected.

"They will be impacted by this proposal going ahead but we believe if you weigh everything up you'll see Tillegra is the most best value for the community in terms of drought security and future generations," Mr Young said.

"It's safe and it's sustainable, therefore it's a project that deserves to go ahead."

The planned national park comes on top of a promised 1500 hectares of vegetation in a biodiversity corridor.

The submission report will be available on Hunter Water's website from today.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
As populations continue to grow and grow and we consume more and more how can we not build more facilities to cater to our needs. It should be obvious to all that population growth is the greatest problem facing the World today. As it unlikely our current social and economic systems will ever address the matter we have to accept we need to expand our impact on the natural environment. The world's population is estimated to grow on average by 38 per cent over the next four decades, from 6.8 billion today, to 9.4 billion in 2050. Treasurer, Wayne Swan, has announced that Australia's rate of population growth will be approaching double that of the rest of the World, or 65 per cent, to 35 million by 2049.
Posted by Get Real, 13/03/2010 5:19:51 AM, on The Herald
The fact that the NSW Labor party will go to all lengths to have this dam in place before the next election should be a concern to all and what is there underlying reason to have it started without all the checks done? To try and bribe the people with these sweeteners is a real worry and starts alarm bells ringing. I say lets wait and checkout all the reasons why the dam should not be built so that there will be no mistakes made by rushing in.
Posted by BJ, 13/03/2010 7:00:49 AM, on The Herald
This will only be more land that the government can use as collateral for mortgage money to fund their AAA credit rating
Posted by stretchyone, 13/03/2010 7:43:21 AM, on The Herald
Lewis's cartoon sums it up brilliantly. Hunter Water are giving us nothing, we are paying for everything.
Posted by Steve, 13/03/2010 9:06:36 AM, on The Herald
Why is the State Governemnt pushing ahead with this disastrous dam in the face of overwhelming evidence that it is unnecessary , damaging to the environment and financially disastrous ? Is it to supply the water greedy mining industry with unlimited water ? Why should Hunter Valley residents be forced to pay for this wasteful and damaging white elephant ?
Posted by trustme, 13/03/2010 9:14:42 AM, on The Herald
how about a legaly enforceable gaurantee the water wont go to sydney. no such gaurantee can only be for one reason.
Posted by just a thought, 13/03/2010 9:18:51 AM, on The Herald
Just run that past me again. The Hunter area has never been short of water. There have never been any water restrictions. Even if Grahamstown and the Chichester dried up there would be enough water in the Tomago sand beds to supply the Hunter's needs. So why do we need the Tillegra Dam? It hasn't got anything to do with supplying Sydney or the coal mines in the upper Hunter, has it ?
Posted by Bill Holley, 13/03/2010 9:28:42 AM, on The Herald
Why has it taken Hunter Water 3 years to come up with yet another round of red herrings? Why, because they hve been told by their masters to sweeten the deal because the Govt and Hunter Water are on the nose withthe voters in the Hunter. Meanwhile all us ratepayers will continue to pay for something not yet approved let alone needed. Hunter Water have failed to demonstrate the need. They have always rejected an independent enquiry, why, again, because deep down Kevin Young would need to go back on his words of October 2006 when hew stated publicly Tillegra Dam was not needed, if ever.
Posted by Biggles, 13/03/2010 9:32:29 AM, on The Herald
The original $300 million has blown out already to $477 million, and the dam is not yet started. Where will the funds come from for all these so-called 'sweeteners'? Better to preserve a healthy river system, use the fertile valley for valuable food production and spend our dollars on 21st century waterwise projects such as recycling.
Posted by Pirrial, 13/03/2010 9:37:54 AM, on The Herald
So the ratepayers will still be slugged. Hunter water rates will sky rocket for a product we dont need.
Posted by davo, 13/03/2010 10:17:35 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: Do the changes to the Tillegra Dam plan revealed in today’s Herald make the proposal more acceptable to you?

Yes
(15.3%)

No
(84.7%)

Total Votes: 372
Poll Date: 12 March, 2010

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Bounce
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...