News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Huntlee, Catherine Hill Bay concerns in planning changes 

Huntlee, Catherine Hill Bay concerns in planning changes

06 Feb, 2010 03:00 AM
THE State Government denied that changes to the Lower Hunter Regional Conservation Plan were a "back door" way of getting the Huntlee and Catherine Hill Bay housing developments back on track.

Some of the biggest housing proposals in the Hunter were left in limbo late last year after the Catherine Hill Bay developments were tossed out by the Land and Environment Court and the Government admitted approving Huntlee unlawfully.

Little had been heard publicly from the Government since but The Herald has learned that letters were sent recently to local councils and environmental groups explaining various amendments to the conservation plan.

The letter from the Department of Environment and Climate Change said the Government was no longer talking about "legally enforceable agreements to transfer 12,000 hectares of privately owned land" and would refer instead to "statements recognising the role of government land and private lands in achieving conservation outcomes".

Departmental director Gary Davies defended the amended conservation plan, saying the wording changes were only minor amendments.

"I can assure you the amendments are in no way a back door attempt to get these developments back on the table," Mr Davies said.

"They will be considered on their merits by the appropriate planning principles."

Cessnock councillor James Ryan, who took part in the Huntlee challenge, said the Government appeared determined to act as if the court challenge had never succeeded.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Let's start building them now!!!
Posted by Den Isles, 6/02/2010 6:35:31 AM, on The Herald
Perfectly normal NSW government behaviour I would say. There is a lot of payback required here. Recall that neither large development at Catherine Hill Bay or Huntlee was in the draft Hunter regional Plan. Payments suchas those admitted on 4Corners seem to have wrought a miracle in the final plan. Also population magically increased between draft and final. BUT no extra dam was required.
Posted by nevatrustem, 6/02/2010 7:07:38 AM, on The Herald
this state government expects trust that the amendments are minor! thankgod people like james ryan are watching their moves. this labor party eat their own.
Posted by trust me nots, 6/02/2010 1:35:28 PM, on The Herald
Regardless of what the anti-development lobby may think, land has to be released and developed for more housing. To those that continually appose these developments, I ask where do you live? I bet you live somewhere that was once a new housing development because I do not know of any of you that live in caves or in bark humpies in the bush.
Posted by thinkitthrough, 6/02/2010 5:39:25 PM, on The Herald
LABOR OUT!!!!!
Posted by pete, 7/02/2010 1:40:23 PM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...